Genes and Development

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hollenhorst, P. C.
Right arrow Articles by Fox, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hollenhorst, P. C.
Right arrow Articles by Fox, C. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Vol. 15, No. 18, pp. 2445-2456, September 15, 2001

RESEARCH PAPER
Mechanisms controlling differential promoter-occupancy by the yeast forkhead proteins Fkh1p and Fkh2p: implications for regulating the cell cycle and differentiation

Peter C. Hollenhorst, Gregory Pietz, and Catherine A. Fox1

Department of Biomolecular Chemistry, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA

The roles of DNA and Mcm1p interactions in determining the overlapping and distinct functions of the yeast cell cycle regulatory transcription factors Fkh1p and Fkh2p were examined. Full-length recombinant Fkh1p and Fkh2p were purified and their binding to bona fide promoters examined in vitro. Each protein bound a variety of target promoters with similar specificity in vitro, consistent with the observation that these proteins bind common promoters in vivo. However, in vivo, the Fkh1p and Fkh2p occupied different target promoters to different extents, suggesting that each was primarily responsible for controlling a different set of genes. Additional in vitro studies provided a mechanistic explanation for this differential promoter-occupancy. Specifically, the Fkh2p, but not the Fkh1p, was capable of binding cooperatively with Mcm1p. The Mcm1p-Fkh2p cooperative binding was enhanced by, but did not require, the presence of a Mcm1p-binding site within a target promoter. Consistent with these data, Mcm1p was present at Fkh-controlled promoters in vivo regardless of whether they contained Mcm1p-binding sites, suggesting a role for Mcm1p at promoters not thought previously to be under Mcm1p control. Analysis of Fkh1p and Fkh2p binding to promoter targets in vivo by use of mutant strains indicated that the two proteins compete for promoter-occupancy at a number of target promoters. We postulate that Fkh1p and a stable Fkh2p/Mcm1p complex compete for binding to target promoters and that the levels and/or binding activity of Fkh1p, but not Fkh2p, are most limiting for promoter-occupancy in vivo. Interestingly, the in vitro DNA-binding assays, using a variety of promoter targets, revealed that bona fide Fkh target promoters contained two or more Fkh-binding sites that allowed the Fkh1p and Fkh2p proteins to form multiple protein-DNA complexes in vitro. Multiple Fkh-binding sites may be a distinguishing feature of bona fide Fkh promoters in yeast and other organisms.

[Key Words: Forkhead; Mcm1p; cell cycle; SFF; transcription; yeast]


1 Corresponding author.


GENES & DEVELOPMENT 15:2445-2456 © 2001 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press  ISSN 0890-9369/01 $5.00

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
L. Casey, E. E. Patterson, U. Muller, and C. A. Fox
Conversion of a Replication Origin to a Silencer through a Pathway Shared by a Forkhead Transcription Factor and an S Phase Cyclin
Mol. Biol. Cell, February 1, 2008; 19(2): 608 - 622.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
K. A. Romer, G.-R. Kayombya, and E. Fraenkel
WebMOTIFS: automated discovery, filtering and scoring of DNA sequence motifs using multiple programs and Bayesian approaches
Nucleic Acids Res., July 13, 2007; 35(suppl_2): W217 - W220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
J. A. Sherriff, N. A. Kent, and J. Mellor
The Isw2 Chromatin-Remodeling ATPase Cooperates with the Fkh2 Transcription Factor To Repress Transcription of the B-Type Cyclin Gene CLB2
Mol. Cell. Biol., April 15, 2007; 27(8): 2848 - 2860.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
E. Coic, K. Sun, C. Wu, and J. E. Haber
Cell Cycle-Dependent Regulation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Donor Preference during Mating-Type Switching by SBF (Swi4/Swi6) and Fkh1.
Mol. Cell. Biol., July 1, 2006; 26(14): 5470 - 5480.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
H.-K. Tsai, H. H.-S. Lu, and W.-H. Li
Statistical methods for identifying yeast cell cycle transcription factors
PNAS, September 20, 2005; 102(38): 13532 - 13537.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
M. L. Alonso-Nunez, H. An, A. B. Martin-Cuadrado, S. Mehta, C. Petit, M. Sipiczki, F. del Rey, K. L. Gould, and C. R. Vazquez de Aldana
Ace2p Controls the Expression of Genes Required for Cell Separation in Schizosaccharomyces pombe
Mol. Biol. Cell, April 1, 2005; 16(4): 2003 - 2017.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
M. Shapira, E. Segal, and D. Botstein
Disruption of Yeast Forkhead-associated Cell Cycle Transcription by Oxidative Stress
Mol. Biol. Cell, December 1, 2004; 15(12): 5659 - 5669.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
A. Pic-Taylor, Z. Darieva, B. A. Morgan, and A. D. Sharrocks
Regulation of Cell Cycle-Specific Gene Expression through Cyclin-Dependent Kinase-Mediated Phosphorylation of the Forkhead Transcription Factor Fkh2p
Mol. Cell. Biol., November 15, 2004; 24(22): 10036 - 10046.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eukaryot CellHome page
R. Bulmer, A. Pic-Taylor, S. K. Whitehall, K. A. Martin, J. B. A. Millar, J. Quinn, and B. A. Morgan
The Forkhead Transcription Factor Fkh2 Regulates the Cell Division Cycle of Schizosaccharomyces pombe
Eukaryot. Cell, August 1, 2004; 3(4): 944 - 954.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
C. Van Slyke and E. J. Grayhack
The essential transcription factor Reb1p interacts with the CLB2 UAS outside of the G2/M control region
Nucleic Acids Res., August 1, 2003; 31(15): 4597 - 4607.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
J. Boros, F.-L. Lim, Z. Darieva, A. Pic-Taylor, R. Harman, B. A. Morgan, and A. D. Sharrocks
Molecular determinants of the cell-cycle regulated Mcm1p-Fkh2p transcription factor complex
Nucleic Acids Res., May 1, 2003; 31(9): 2279 - 2288.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
A. Morillon, J. O'Sullivan, A. Azad, N. Proudfoot, and J. Mellor
Regulation of Elongating RNA Polymerase II by Forkhead Transcription Factors in Yeast
Science, April 18, 2003; 300(5618): 492 - 495.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
K. Sun, E. Coic, Z. Zhou, P. Durrens, and J. E. Haber
Saccharomyces forkhead protein Fkh1 regulates donor preference during mating-type switching through the recombination enhancer
Genes & Dev., August 15, 2002; 16(16): 2085 - 2096.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Genome Res. Learn. Mem.
Protein Science RNA Genes Dev.