|
|
|
RESEARCH PAPER
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA
Bistable gene regulatory circuits can adopt more than one stable epigenetic state. To understand how natural circuits have this and other systems properties, several groups have designed regulatory circuits de novo. Here we describe an alternative approach. We have modified an existing bistable circuit, that of phage
. With this approach, we used powerful genetic selections to identify functional circuits and selected for variants with altered behavior. The
circuit involves two antagonistic repressors, CI and Cro. We replaced
Cro with a module that included Lac repressor and several lac operators. Using a combinatorial approach, we isolated variants with different types of regulatory behavior. Several resembled wild-type
they could grow lytically, could form highly stable lysogens, and carried out prophage induction. Another variant could form stable lysogens in the presence of a ligand for Lac repressor but switched to the lytic state when the ligand was removed. Several isolates evolved toward a desired behavior under selective pressure. These results strongly support the idea that complex circuits can arise during the course of evolution by a combination of simpler regulatory modules. They also underscore the advantages of modifying a natural circuit as an approach to understanding circuit design, systems behavior, and circuit evolution.
[Keywords: Gene regulatory circuit; lambda phage; circuit design; Lac repressor; evolution of gene regulatory circuitry; systems behavior]
Received May 26, 2004; revised version accepted July 9, 2004.
Article and publication are at http://www.genesdev.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gad.1226004.
1 Corresponding author. E-MAIL jlittle{at}u.arizona.edu; FAX (520) 621-5629.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Lou, X. Yang, X. Liu, B. He, and Q. Ouyang A Quantitative Study of {lambda}-Phage SWITCH and Its Components Biophys. J., April 15, 2007; 92(8): 2685 - 2693. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Drubin, J. C. Way, and P. A. Silver Designing biological systems Genes & Dev., February 1, 2007; 21(3): 242 - 254. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Court, A. B. Oppenheim, and S. L. Adhya A New Look at Bacteriophage {lambda} Genetic Networks J. Bacteriol., January 15, 2007; 189(2): 298 - 304. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Atsumi and J. W. Little A synthetic phage {lambda} regulatory circuit PNAS, December 12, 2006; 103(50): 19045 - 19050. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Atsumi and J. W. Little Role of the lytic repressor in prophage induction of phage {lambda} as analyzed by a module-replacement approach PNAS, March 21, 2006; 103(12): 4558 - 4563. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. B. Michalowski and J. W. Little Positive Autoregulation of cI Is a Dispensable Feature of the Phage {lambda} Gene Regulatory Circuitry J. Bacteriol., September 15, 2005; 187(18): 6430 - 6442. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. B. Michalowski, M. D. Short, and J. W. Little Sequence Tolerance of the Phage {lambda} PRM Promoter: Implications for Evolution of Gene Regulatory Circuitry J. Bacteriol., December 1, 2004; 186(23): 7988 - 7999. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||