Genes and Development

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


GENES & DEVELOPMENT 3:1179-1189, 1989
ISSN 0890-9369
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bentley, D L
Right arrow Articles by Groudine, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bentley, D L
Right arrow Articles by Groudine, M
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Research Papers

Accurate, TATA box-dependent polymerase III transcription from promoters of the c-myc gene in injected Xenopus oocytes.

D L Bentley, W L Brown, and M Groudine

Molecular Genetics of Differentiation Laboratory, ICRF Laboratory, London, UK.

Abstract

We have investigated the factors that permit a gene normally transcribed by RNA polymerase II to be transcribed by RNA polymerase III. It was shown previously that the human c-myc gene could be transcribed in vitro and in Xenopus oocytes by both alpha-amanitin-sensitive and alpha-amanitin-resistant polymerases, probably corresponding to polymerase II and polymerase III. We confirmed this observation in microinjected oocytes and showed that the alpha-amanitin-resistant transcription of c-myc was competed by known polymerase III genes. Polymerase III transcription of c-myc was very inefficient compared to other polymerase III genes, however, and was observed only when large amounts of template DNA were injected. At lower DNA concentrations the gene was transcribed, exclusively by polymerase II. In contrast, the adenovirus major late promoter was not transcribed by polymerase III. The 5' ends of polymerase III RNAs were almost indistinguishable from those of polymerase II RNAs initiating at the P1 and P2 promoters of the human and mouse c-myc genes. Furthermore, point mutations in the TATA box of the human P2 promoter greatly reduced polymerase III activity. At this promoter, therefore, polymerase II and polymerase III recognize a common element, the TATA box, which probably plays an important role in specifying the start site of transcription for both polymerases. We suggest that the highly accurate though inefficient mimicry of polymerase II by polymerase III at the c-myc promoters reflects the common evolutionary origin of these two enzymes.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
W. Huang and S. J. Flint
Unusual Properties of Adenovirus E2E Transcription by RNA Polymerase III
J. Virol., April 1, 2003; 77(7): 4015 - 4024.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
K. Yankulov, I. Todorov, P. Romanowski, D. Licatalosi, K. Cilli, S. McCracken, R. Laskey, and D. L. Bentley
MCM Proteins Are Associated with RNA Polymerase II Holoenzyme
Mol. Cell. Biol., September 1, 1999; 19(9): 6154 - 6163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
F. Pessler and N. Hernandez
The HIV-1 Inducer of Short Transcripts Activates the Synthesis of 5,6-Dichloro-1-beta -D-benzimidazole-resistant Short Transcripts in Vitro
J. Biol. Chem., February 27, 1998; 273(9): 5375 - 5384.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
S Roberts, T Purton, and D L Bentley
A protein-binding site in the c-myc promoter functions as a terminator of RNA polymerase II transcription.
Genes & Dev., August 1, 1992; 6(8): 1562 - 1574.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
S M Lobo, J Lister, M L Sullivan, and N Hernandez
The cloned RNA polymerase II transcription factor IID selects RNA polymerase III to transcribe the human U6 gene in vitro.
Genes & Dev., August 1, 1991; 5(8): 1477 - 1489.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
D A Brow and C Guthrie
Transcription of a yeast U6 snRNA gene requires a polymerase III promoter element in a novel position.
Genes & Dev., August 1, 1990; 4(8): 1345 - 1356.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. Ellsworth, R. L. Finnen, and S. J. Flint
Superimposed Promoter Sequences of the Adenoviral E2 Early RNA Polymerase III and RNA Polymerase II Transcription Units
J. Biol. Chem., January 5, 2001; 276(1): 827 - 834.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Genome Res. Learn. Mem.
Protein Science RNA Genes Dev.