Genes and Development

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


GENES & DEVELOPMENT 8:290-299, 1994
ISSN 0890-9369
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Latham, K E
Right arrow Articles by Schultz, R M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Latham, K E
Right arrow Articles by Schultz, R M
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Research Papers

Igf2r and Igf2 gene expression in androgenetic, gynogenetic, and parthenogenetic preimplantation mouse embryos: absence of regulation by genomic imprinting.

K E Latham, A S Doherty, C D Scott, and R M Schultz

Temple University School of Medicine, Department of Biochemistry, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19140.

Abstract

Genomic imprinting in mammals is believed to result from modifications to chromosomes during gametogenesis that inactivate the paternal or maternal allele. The genes encoding the insulin-like growth factor type 2 (Igf2) and its receptor (Igf2r) are reciprocally imprinted and expressed from the paternal and maternal genomes, respectively, in the fetal and adult mouse. We find that both genes are expressed in androgenetic, gynogenetic, and parthenogenetic preimplantation mouse embryos. These results indicate that inactivation of imprinted genes occurs postfertilization (most likely postimplantation) and that genomic imprinting and gene inactivation are separate processes. We propose that imprinting marks the chromosome so that regulatory factors expressed in cells at later times can recognize the imprint and selectively inactivate the maternal or paternal allele. For these genes, this finding invalidates models of genomic imprinting that require them to be inactive from the time of fertilization.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
M. Misirlioglu, G. P. Page, H. Sagirkaya, A. Kaya, J. J. Parrish, N. L. First, and E. Memili
Dynamics of global transcriptome in bovine matured oocytes and preimplantation embryos
PNAS, December 12, 2006; 103(50): 18905 - 18910.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
J. L. Thorvaldsen, A. M. Fedoriw, S. Nguyen, and M. S. Bartolomei
Developmental Profile of H19 Differentially Methylated Domain (DMD) Deletion Alleles Reveals Multiple Roles of the DMD in Regulating Allelic Expression and DNA Methylation at the Imprinted H19/Igf2 Locus
Mol. Cell. Biol., February 15, 2006; 26(4): 1245 - 1258.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
S J Martins da Silva, J O Gardner, J E Taylor, A Springbett, P A De Sousa, and R A Anderson
Brain-derived neurotrophic factor promotes bovine oocyte cytoplasmic competence for embryo development
Reproduction, April 1, 2005; 129(4): 423 - 434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
M. R.W. Mann, Y. G. Chung, L. D. Nolen, R. I. Verona, K. E. Latham, and M. S. Bartolomei
Disruption of Imprinted Gene Methylation and Expression in Cloned Preimplantation Stage Mouse Embryos
Biol Reprod, September 1, 2003; 69(3): 902 - 914.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
S. Banerjee, S. Lamond, A. McMahon, S. Campbell, and G. Nargund
Does blastocyst culture eliminate paternal chromosomal defects and select good embryos?: Inheritance of an abnormal paternal genome following ICSI
Hum. Reprod., December 1, 2000; 15(12): 2455 - 2459.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
P Svoboda, P Stein, H Hayashi, and R. Schultz
Selective reduction of dormant maternal mRNAs in mouse oocytes by RNA interference
Development, January 10, 2000; 127(19): 4147 - 4156.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
P. E. Szabó, G. P. Pfeifer, and J. R. Mann
Characterization of Novel Parent-Specific Epigenetic Modifications Upstream of the Imprinted Mouse H19 Gene
Mol. Cell. Biol., November 1, 1998; 18(11): 6767 - 6776.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.Home page
T. Goto and M. Monk
Regulation of X-Chromosome Inactivation in Development in Mice and Humans
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., June 1, 1998; 62(2): 362 - 378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
J Mitra and R. Schultz
Regulation of the acquisition of meiotic competence in the mouse: changes in the subcellular localization of cdc2, cyclin B1, cdc25C and wee1, and in the concentration of these proteins and their transcripts
J. Cell Sci., January 9, 1996; 109(9): 2407 - 2415.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
P E Szabo and J R Mann
Allele-specific expression and total expression levels of imprinted genes during early mouse development: implications for imprinting mechanisms.
Genes & Dev., December 15, 1995; 9(24): 3097 - 3108.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
D. P. Barlow
Gametic Imprinting in Mammals
Science, December 8, 1995; 270(5242): 1610 - 1613.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
P E Szabo and J R Mann
Biallelic expression of imprinted genes in the mouse germ line: implications for erasure, establishment, and mechanisms of genomic imprinting.
Genes & Dev., August 1, 1995; 9(15): 1857 - 1868.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
E. Newman-Smith and Z Werb
Stem cell defects in parthenogenetic peri-implantation embryos
Development, January 7, 1995; 121(7): 2069 - 2077.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
U Grieshammer, M. McGrew, and N Rosenthal
Role of methylation in maintenance of positionally restricted transgene expression in developing muscle
Development, January 7, 1995; 121(7): 2245 - 2253.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
J. Collins, J. Lorimer, D. Garrod, S. Pidsley, R. Buxton, and T. Fleming
Regulation of desmocollin transcription in mouse preimplantation embryos
Development, January 3, 1995; 121(3): 743 - 753.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
M M Lau, C E Stewart, Z Liu, H Bhatt, P Rotwein, and C L Stewart
Loss of the imprinted IGF2/cation-independent mannose 6-phosphate receptor results in fetal overgrowth and perinatal lethality.
Genes & Dev., December 15, 1994; 8(24): 2953 - 2963.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
K. Latham
Strain-specific differences in mouse oocytes and their contributions to epigenetic inheritance
Development, January 12, 1994; 120(12): 3419 - 3426.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
C. Buzin, J. Mann, and J Singer-Sam
Quantitative RT-PCR assays show Xist RNA levels are low in mouse female adult tissue, embryos and embryoid bodies
Development, January 12, 1994; 120(12): 3529 - 3536.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
P. Singh
Molecular mechanisms of cellular determination: their relation to chromatin structure and parental imprinting
J. Cell Sci., January 10, 1994; 107(10): 2653 - 2668.
[PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
R Feil, J Walter, N. Allen, and W Reik
Developmental control of allelic methylation in the imprinted mouse Igf2 and H19 genes
Development, January 10, 1994; 120(10): 2933 - 2943.
[Abstract] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Genome Res. Learn. Mem.
Protein Science RNA Genes Dev.