|
|
|
Vol. 11, No. 21,
pp. 2883-2896,
November 1, 1997
1 Department of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706 USA; 2 Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology and Neuroscience Research Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106 USA; 3 Division of Basic Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109 USA; 4 Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Zoology Department, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98109 USA
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The endoderm in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans is clonally derived from the E founder cell. We identified a single genomic region (the endoderm-determining region, or EDR) that is required for the production of the entire C. elegans endoderm. In embryos lacking the EDR, the E cell gives rise to ectoderm and mesoderm instead of endoderm and appears to adopt the fate of its cousin, the C founder cell. end-1, a gene from the EDR, restores endoderm production in EDR deficiency homozygotes. end-1 transcripts are first detectable specifically in the E cell, consistent with a direct role for end-1 in endoderm development. The END-1 protein is an apparent zinc finger-containing GATA transcription factor. As GATA factors have been implicated in endoderm development in other animals, our findings suggest that endoderm may be specified by molecularly conserved mechanisms in triploblastic animals. We propose that end-1, the first zygotic gene known to be involved in the specification of germ layer and founder cell identity in C. elegans, may link maternal genes that regulate the establishment of the endoderm to downstream genes responsible for endoderm differentiation.
[Key Words: GATA transcription factor; endoderm; germ layer; deficiencies; Wnt signaling; C. elegans development]
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Early in embryonic development of all triploblastic animals,
cells undergo dramatic rearrangements to form three germ
layers. The mechanisms that establish the germ layers
and that direct their unique pathways of differentiation are central
concerns in animal embryology. The nematode Caenorhabditis
elegans provides an amenable molecular genetic system with which to
study the mechanisms that specify the germ layers. The relatively
simple pattern of development of the C. elegans endoderm,
which gives rise to a single organ, the intestine, has made it the
focus of a number of embryological, genetic, and molecular studies
(e.g., Laufer et al. 1980
; Edgar and McGhee 1988
; Aamodt et al. 1991
;
Goldstein 1992
).
The endoderm in nematodes arises exclusively from the E blastomere, one
of the six "founder" cells (Fig. 1; Deppe et
al. 1978
; Sulston et al. 1983
). Each of the founder cells shows
distinct rates of cell division and produces a unique repertoire of
differentiated cell types. The ability to make endoderm appears to be
restricted to the E blastomere by a series of asymmetric cell divisions
that yield qualitatively different sister cells (Laufer et al. 1980
; Cowan and McIntosh 1985
; Schierenberg and Wood 1985
; Edgar and McGhee
1986
). These observations suggested that the fate of E is controlled in
part by regulatory factors that act cell autonomously. However,
specification of the endoderm has also been shown to require an
inductive cellular interaction: EMS, the parent of E and the MS founder
cell, a mesodermal progenitor, is induced to undergo a developmentally
asymmetric cell division by a neighboring cell, P2 (Goldstein
1992
, 1993
). This interaction was recently found (Rocheleau et al.
1997
; Thorpe et al. 1997
) to involve the Wnt signaling pathway (for
review, see Nusse and Varmus 1992
). If this interaction is prevented,
EMS divides to produce two equivalent MS-like cells and no intestine is
generated (Goldstein 1992
, 1993
).
|
Several maternal genes have been identified that are required for
proper endoderm formation; however, none of these appears to direct the
fate of the E blastomere specifically (e.g., Kemphues et al. 1988
;
Bowerman et al. 1992
; Mello et al. 1992
; Lin et al. 1995
). For example,
although mutations in par-1 prevent endoderm formation, this
gene appears to be required principally for establishing the initial
anterior-posterior asymmetry of the early embryo (Kemphues et al.
1988
). Mutations in the skn-1 gene affect the development of
both E and MS, causing these blastomeres to develop like their cousin,
C, and produce body-wall muscle and epidermis (Bowerman et al. 1992
).
skn-1 encodes an apparent transcription factor that accumulates in EMS and its descendants through the 12-cell stage, suggesting that SKN-1 may activate early zygotic transcription of genes
that control E- and MS-specific differentiation (Bowerman et al. 1993
;
Blackwell et al. 1994
). The pie-1 and pop-1 maternal genes appear to prevent blastomeres other than E from producing endoderm (Mello et al. 1992
; Lin et al. 1995
). pie-1 encodes
an apparent zinc finger protein (Mello et al. 1996
) that prevents the
sister of EMS from adopting an EMS-like fate (Mello et al. 1992
) by
causing general repression of zygotic gene expression in that cell
(Mello et al. 1996
; Seydoux et al. 1996
). In pop-1 mutant
embryos, MS adopts the fate of its sister, E, and makes endoderm
instead of mesoderm (Lin et al. 1995
). The POP-1 protein is a putative
DNA-binding protein containing a high mobility group (HMG) box motif
related to LEF-1 (Travis et al. 1991
; Lin et al. 1995
). POP-1 is
present at higher levels in MS than in E, and it has been implicated
recently as a component in the Wnt pathway involved in induction of
endoderm by P2 (Rocheleau et al. 1997
; Thorpe et al. 1997
).
POP-1 may make MS different from E by repressing transcription of
zygotic genes that promote endoderm formation. Zygotically required
genes that direct endoderm formation and that might be targets of POP-1
and SKN-1 have not been reported previously.
We describe here the characterization of a genomic region, the
endoderm-determining region (EDR), that is required zygotically to
specify the E fate in C. elegans. Embryos homozygous for
deletions of the EDR do not produce endoderm because the E blastomere
adopts a fate similar to that of its cousin, C, thereby producing
ectoderm and mesoderm. We identified a gene, end-1, in the EDR
based on its ability to restore endoderm differentiation in the
deficiency mutant embryos. end-1 encodes a GATA transcription
factor-like protein containing a single zinc finger domain. Similar
factors have been shown to be expressed in the endoderm of vertebrates and the SERPENT/ABF GATA factor has recently been found
to be required for endoderm production in Drosophila (Reuter
1994
; Rehorn et al. 1996
). We propose that END-1 regulates the identity
of the E blastomere and participates in specifying the endoderm by a
mechanism that is phylogenetically conserved. end-1
transcripts are first present in the E cell. This early expression
pattern and the phenotype of EDR deficiency mutants suggest that
end-1 may be a direct downstream target of the maternal Wnt
signaling pathway that controls the identity of the E blastomere in
C. elegans embryos.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Identification of a genomic region required for production of the endoderm
The precursor of the endoderm, E, arises at the seven-cell stage.
Its daughters migrate into the interior of the embryo at the onset of
gastrulation in the 28-cell-stage embryo and undergo several rounds of
division to produce the 20 differentiated intestinal cells by
mid-embryogenesis. To identify zygotically (embryonically transcribed)
genes required for endoderm formation, we systematically scanned a set
of deficiencies that collectively remove ~67%-80% of the C. elegans genome (see also Terns et al. 1997
). A single region on
chromosome V, the EDR, was identified that is required for intestinal
differentiation (see below).
To isolate point mutations that result in a penetrant absence of intestine, several large-scale, genome-wide screens of zygotic lethal mutants were performed in two laboratories (J. Rothman and J. Priess, unpubl.). Although a point mutagen was used, these screens identified only three deficiency mutants (wDf3, wDf4, and zuDf2), all of which reside in the vicinity of the EDR. An additional screen of ~17,000 haploid genomes targeted to the EDR also failed to identify any point mutations that result in the penetrant absence of intestine. These observations suggest that the EDR may contain functionally redundant genes required for production of a differentiated intestine (see Discussion).
The failure to isolate point mutations led us to characterize the requirement of the EDR by analyzing the phenotypes of deficiency homozygotes. Embryos homozygous for zuDf2, itDf2, nDf42, wDf3, and wDf4, which delete the EDR (for details, see Fig. 6A, below), completely lack gut-specific birefringent rhabditin granules (Fig. 2) and fail to express two gut-specific molecular markers (Fig. 3). As other major differentiated tissue types, including pharynx muscle, body-wall muscle, epidermis, and neurons, are made in zuDf2 mutant embryos (Fig. 3), this differentiation defect appears to be specific to endoderm.
|
|
|
The EDR is required for production of ectopic endoderm in pie-1 and pop-1 mutants
Maternal-effect mutations in pie-1 and pop-1
result in the production of ectopic endoderm as a result of
transformations of the P3 and MS blastomeres, respectively,
into E-like cells (Mello et al. 1992
; Lin et al. 1995
). We found that
no intestine was made in approximately one-fourth (18 of 65 embryos
examined) of the progeny of parents homozygous for pie-1 and
heterozygous for itDf2, indicating that production of ectopic
intestine in pie-1 mutants requires zygotically expressed
genes within the EDR. Moreover, whereas injection of antisense
pop-1 RNA into wild-type parents always resulted in a
pop-1 phenocopy (all progeny showed extra intestine;
n = 226 embryos), approximately one-fourth (46 of 158 embryos examined) of the progeny derived from heterozygous
zuDf2 parents injected with the pop-1 antisense RNA
completely lacked a differentiated intestine. Together, these
observations suggest that the EDR is essential for a blastomere to
produce endoderm irrespective of the position or lineal origin of the
blastomere.
E is transformed to a C-like blastomere in EDR deficiency embryos
To address whether the E cell is mis-specified in EDR deficiency embryos, we asked what differentiated tissue types are generated from E when it is isolated by laser ablation of all other cells (Fig. 4; Table 1). Whereas E blastomeres isolated from wild-type embryos always produce intestinal cells, one-fourth of the E blastomeres isolated from embryos produced by zuDf2 heterozygotes generated differentiated body-wall muscle and epidermis (Table 1; Fig. 4), cell types characteristic of the C blastomere (Fig. 1).
|
|
We performed cell lineage analysis of itDf2 mutant embryos to
ask whether E is transformed to a C-like cell. The earliest detectable
lineage alteration was the premature division and defective gastrulation of the E daughters (see Table 2).
Gastrulation begins at the 28-cell stage in wild-type embryos, when the
E daughters migrate into the interior (Sulston et al. 1983
). In five
itDf2 homozygotes, the E daughters divided precociously on the
surface of the embryo; in some cases the E granddaughters later
migrated inward. Analysis of the later E-lineage pattern in two
itDf2 mutant embryos showed that it was dramatically altered
and strongly resembled the lineage of the wild-type C founder cell
(Fig. 5). Limited lineage analysis of other
blastomeres, for example, C and MS, revealed apparently normal lineages
arising from these cells (not shown).
|
|
These results strongly suggest that the failure to make intestine in EDR deficiency mutants results from a transformation of the E cell into a C-like cell. Thus, the EDR apparently contains one or more zygotic genes required to direct the production of endoderm from the E cell.
Molecular identification of the end-1 gene
To determine the physical extent of the EDR, we mapped the endpoints of overlapping deficiencies (summarized in Fig. 6; see Materials and Methods) and narrowed the maximum interval required for production of intestine to <200 kb. Clones in the interval were tested for rescue of the intestinal differentiation defect by transformation into deficiency heterozygotes (see Materials and Methods). A 4-kb fragment apparently containing a single gene, end-1 (for endoderm specification), was found to be sufficient to rescue the intestinal differentiation defect (see below) but not the embryonic lethality of the deficiencies, which remove many genes.
Rescued itDf2 embryos appeared virtually identical to untransformed itDf2 embryos except for the presence of differentiated intestinal cells (Fig. 7). In addition, the E-cell lineage in rescued embryos was found to be similar to the wild-type E lineage (Fig. 8). Premature division of the E daughters was partially rescued in transgenic deficiency homozygotes carrying extrachromosomal copies of end-1(+) (Table 2). Gastrulation appeared to have occurred, based on the organization and position of the intestine in rescued embryos (Fig. 7A). These results indicate that end-1(+) activity can direct E-cell specification in EDR deficiency embryos.
|
|
end-1 encodes a GATA factor-like protein
The 4-kb end-1 rescuing fragment was used to isolate
several end-1 cDNAs (see Materials and Methods; Fig.
9). The longest (0.85-kb) cDNA
detected a single 0.85-kb transcript on a blot of early embryonic mRNA
(Fig. 10). Analysis of the end-1 transcript by 5
rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) confirmed that the end-1 cDNA is nearly full length. A minigene containing the
5
genomic flanking sequence of end-1 placed upstream of
the end-1 cDNA (see Fig. 6D) rescued the gut differentiation
defect of homozygous deficiency embryos (see Materials and
Methods), demonstrating that this cDNA contains the functional
end-1 coding region. The 0.85-kb cDNA codes for a
221-amino-acid polypeptide (Fig. 9), a portion of which is an apparent
zinc finger domain that shares substantial sequence similarity with the
GATA factor family of transcription factors (Fig.
11). As is generally the case with the other GATA
factors, the sequences outside the zinc finger and adjacent basic
regions are not conserved.
|
|
|
Comparison of the nucleotide sequences of the end-1 cDNA clone
with that of the corresponding genomic region revealed four exons
flanked by conserved donor and acceptor sequences typical of C. elegans introns (Emmons 1988
). Examination of the sequences upstream of the coding region suggests the possible existence of
cis-acting regulatory sites for known regulators of endoderm formation in C. elegans (Fig. 9). A single match to the
consensus binding motif of HMG-box-containing proteins (Laudet et al.
1993
; possibly recognized by the POP-1 HMG-box-containing maternal
protein), six consensus binding site sequences for the maternal SKN-1
DNA-binding protein (Blackwell et al. 1994
), and seven matches to the
consensus GATA-binding site are present in the upstream region (Fig.
9).
end-1 transcripts are present specifically in the E cell and early E lineage
end-1 RNA is first detected by in situ hybridization in the E cell of an 8-cell embryo and becomes more abundant in the daughters of E by the 15-cell stage (Fig. 12). The strongest signal was detected at the 20- to 30-cell stage; however, the message is at low abundance at all stages that it is detected (Fig. 12). Transcripts were undetectable after the division of the E daughters (50- to 100-cell stage). No end-1 transcripts were detected outside the E lineage at any stage in embryogenesis.
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The zygotic genome is necessary for endoderm specification
Previous genetic studies on endoderm specification in C. elegans have focused on maternally expressed genes that determine which early blastomere adopts the E fate (Kemphues et al. 1988
; Bowerman et al. 1992
; Mello et al. 1992
; Lin et al. 1995
; Rocheleau et
al. 1997
; Thorpe et al. 1997
). Several observations have suggested that
zygotically expressed genes might also act in specifying the E-cell
fate and the unique properties of the E lineage. In normal development,
the daughters of E undergo gastrulation before their division and
subsequently divide later than the daughters of MS, the sister of E. When zygotic transcription is inhibited by blocking synthesis of RNA
polymerase with antisense RNA or
-amanitin, the daughters of E
divide precociously, do not gastrulate normally, and fail to produce
gut differentiation markers (Edgar et al. 1994
; Powell-Coffman et al.
1996
). Similar defects are observed in skn-1 maternal mutants
(Bowerman et al. 1992
). skn-1 encodes an apparent
transcription factor that is presumed to specify the E lineage by
regulating expression of one or more zygotic genes (Bowerman et al.
1993
). Here, we describe the identification of a small genomic region,
the EDR, that appears to contain such a zygotic gene. EDR deficiency
embryos fail to produce differentiated endoderm and show premature
division and defective gastrulation of the E daughters, similar to the
phenotypes observed in skn-1 mutants or when zygotic
transcription is blocked.
A gene from the EDR, end-1, is capable of restoring endoderm differentiation, a normal E-cell lineage, and normal gastrulation of the E daughters to deficiency embryos. These results suggest that end-1 may be one of the genes that account for the requirement of zygotic transcription in controlling the unique properties of the E lineage.
Maternal and zygotic regulation of endoderm specification
Two maternally controlled pathways appear to specify endoderm in
early C. elegans embryos: One involves an inductive signal from the P2 blastomere via the Wnt pathway (Goldstein 1992
,
1993
; Rocheleau et al. 1997
; Thorpe et al. 1997
); the other requires maternal SKN-1 (Bowerman et al. 1992
, 1993
). When either pathway is
disrupted, the E blastomere adopts a fate distinct from that of the
normal E: In the absence of SKN-1, E becomes a C-like cell (Bowerman et
al. 1992
); when the P2 inductive signal is removed, E adopts
an MS-like fate (Goldstein 1992
, 1993
).
Two maternally expressed putative transcription factors, SKN-1 and
PAL-1, are present in the E blastomere of wild-type embryos. Genetic
and molecular studies suggest that E development requires high levels
of SKN-1 (Bowerman et al. 1992
, 1993
) and that this factor blocks PAL-1
activity (Hunter and Kenyon 1996
). In EDR deficiency embryos, E is
transformed to a C-like cell, reminiscent of the maternal
skn-1 phenotype (Bowerman et al. 1992
). Because the fate of a
wild-type C blastomere requires PAL-1 activity (Hunter and Kenyon
1996
), this result suggests that PAL-1 becomes active in the E lineage
in EDR deficiency embryos. There are several models that are compatible
with these observations. For example, SKN-1 might directly activate the
expression of a gene such as end-1 in the EDR, and
end-1 might in turn repress the transcription of genes that
would otherwise be activated by PAL-1. The presence of SKN-1 consensus
binding sites (Blackwell et al. 1994
) upstream of the end-1
coding region is consistent with such a possibility; future experiments
should determine whether these sites play a role in end-1
expression.
Induction of endoderm via the Wnt pathway at the four-cell stage may
cause an E-inhibiting factor to be inactivated in the E cell (Goldstein
1995
). When the inductive signal is absent, such a factor would be
present in the E lineage, resulting in an E-to-MS transformation.
POP-1, which shares structural similarity to vertebrate LEF-1 (Travis
et al. 1991
) and which is present at low levels in E and high levels in
MS, is a candidate for such a factor (Lin et al. 1995
). Elimination of
POP-1 causes MS to adopt an E fate. Therefore, the Wnt signal appears
to restrict endoderm development to the E lineage by lowering the
levels of the POP-1 protein in the E cell. As shown here, the ability
of MS to produce intestine in the absence of POP-1 is dependent on zygotic activity of the EDR. The presence of an HMG box consensus binding site upstream of end-1 is consistent with the notion
that POP-1 might directly repress end-1 expression in the MS
lineage, thereby preventing MS from adopting an E fate. Thus,
end-1 may be an immediate downstream target of the Wnt
signaling pathway.
The transition from maternal to zygotic gene control has not been identified for any cell fate decision in C. elegans embryos. The early defects in the EDR deficiency embryos and early expression of end-1 transcripts in the E cell suggest that end-1 may be directly acted upon by maternal gene products, hence defining such a maternal-to-zygotic transition in the specification of cell fate.
END-1, GATA factors, and endoderm development
end-1 encodes a GATA transcription factor-like protein.
GATA factors generally contain a DNA-binding domain consisting of two
similar C4 zinc fingers and regulate transcription of various target genes generally by binding to consensus WGATAR sequences (Evans
et al. 1988
; Lee et al. 1991
; Zon et al. 1991
). GATA factors have been
implicated in endoderm development in other animals (e.g., Arceci et
al. 1993
; Laverriere et al. 1994
). Of particular note,
Drosophila SERPENT, a GATA factor that, like END-1, contains only a single zinc finger, appears to be essential for the formation of
endoderm (Reuter 1994
; Rehorn et al. 1996
). In serpent
mutants, the midgut, which is endodermally derived, is not made and
tissue typical of the ectodermally derived foregut and hindgut is
present in the region of the alimentary canal normally occupied by
midgut (Reuter 1994
). A transformation of endoderm to ectoderm in the absence of serpent function is reminiscent of the E
C
(endoderm
ectoderm + mesoderm) cell fate transformation
that we observe in EDR deficiency embryos. Our findings and those of
Rehorn et al. (1996)
suggest that the molecular mechanisms that specify
endoderm may be conserved among animals. Several vertebrate GATA
factors are also expressed in endodermal tissues, where they may also
perform fuctions in endoderm development (Evans et al. 1988
; Laverriere
et al. 1994
).
Previous studies of intestine-specific gene expression suggest that
END-1 might directly activate expression of genes involved in
differentiation of the intestine. In C. elegans, several
intestine-specific differentiation genes, including ges-1 and
vit-2, contain GATA regulatory sequences required for
gut-specific transcription (MacMorris et al. 1992
; Stroeher et al.
1994
). Our observation that ges-1 is not expressed in embryos
carrying deletions of end-1 (data not shown) is consistent
with the view that END-1 may directly activate ges-1
transcription. In addition, END-1 might also regulate its own
expression, as suggested by the presence of GATA consensus sites
upstream of the end-1 coding sequence near other putative regulatory elements. Such autoregulation has been proposed for the
mouse and chicken GATA-1 genes (Hannon et al. 1991
; Tsai et al. 1991
).
Is end-1 part of a gene complex required for endoderm specification?
Although end-1 is sufficient to promote endoderm
differentiation in EDR deficiency embryos, a number of observations
suggest that end-1 may not, by itself, be absolutely required
to specify endoderm. Despite considerable efforts, including an
extensive lethal screen targeted to the EDR and a number of genome-wide screens in which many alleles of other genes were identified, we have
been unable to generate mutations in any single zygotic gene that
result in a penetrant absence of gut (S. Gendreau, R. Hill, J. Priess,
and J. Rothman, unpubl.). In addition, although injection of antisense
RNA has often been found to result in phenocopies of loss-of-function
mutations in many genes required for normal embryonic development in
C. elegans (e.g., Guo and Kemphues 1995
), we have found that
injection of antisense end-1 RNA into wild-type hermaphrodites
failed to result in any progeny lacking an intestine (J. Zhu, unpubl.).
These observations lead us to suggest that there may be at least two
functionally redundant genes that comprise a gene complex within the
EDR required to specify the endoderm. Although deficiencies such as
itDf2 would eliminate such a gene complex, revealing its essential role in endoderm development, loss of one gene in the complex
would not result in the penetrant absence of endoderm. Recent
experiments (E. Newman-Smith, J. Zhu, and J. Rothman, unpubl.) have
implicated a second gene ~40 kb from end-1 within the EDR that rescues the endoderm differentiation defect of EDR deficiencies, consistent with the notion that the EDR contains a gene complex required zygotically to specify the endoderm in C. elegans.
This second gene encodes an apparent zinc finger transcription factor that is not related to GATA factors. This observation implies that,
unlike a number of cases of genetic redundancy in C. elegans (e.g., Lambie and Kimble 1991
), this redundancy is not an example of
recently duplicated genes; rather, the presence of two dissimilar but
redundant genes might indicate a common regulatory mechanism to which
these genes are subjected.
| |
Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Worm strains and alleles
All stocks were derived from wild-type C. elegans
variety Bristol, strain N2 (Brenner 1974
). Nematodes were grown at
20°C unless otherwise indicated. The genetic markers and
deficiencies used were ced-1 (e1735) I,
unc-42(e270) V, dpy-21(e428) V,
him-5(e1467) V, sqt-3(sc63),
egl-1(n986), unc-76(e911),
itDf2 V, nDf42 V, yDf8 V, yDf9 V,
arDf1 V, zuDf2 V, wDf4 V, wDf3 V. The strain containing arDf1 was provided by J. Shaw
(University of Minnesota, St. Paul). All other strains are available
from the C. elegans Genetics Center. JR70 is ced-1;
itDf2/dpy-21 unc-42. JJ1035 is
zuDf2/sqt-3 egl-1 unc-76. MT2560 is
sqt-3 egl-1 unc-76.
Nomarski microscopy and immunofluorescence
Methods for mounting and viewing C. elegans embryos by
Nomarski microscopy have been described previously (Sulston et al. 1983
). Embryos were fixed and stained for immunofluorescence as described (Sulston and Hodgkin 1988
). Deficiency mutant embryos were
collected for Nomarski microscopy and immunofluorescence ~14-18 hr
after being laid or after wild-type embryos hatched, unless otherwise
stated. Antibodies NE8/4C6 (Goh and Bogaert 1991
), 3NB12
(Priess and Thomson 1987
), and 1CB4 (Okamoto and Thomson 1985
) were
obtained from the MRC-Cambridge monoclonal antibody collection.
Anti-LIN-26 antibody was a generous gift of Dr. M. Labouesse (IGBMC,
CNRS, Illkirch, France). Anti-rabbit and anti-mouse fluorescein-conjugated antibodies were obtained from Sigma.
Antisense RNA injections
pop-1 antisense RNA (a gift from Dr. R. Lin) was
prepared from pRL160 as described in Lin et al. (1995)
. pop-1
antisense RNA was injected into both distal arms of the gonad of mid-L4
N2 or JJ1035 hermaphrodites. Injected P0 animals were placed
onto individual plates. N2 animals were transferred every 12 hr to set
up F1 cohorts that were examined 6-12 hr later. JJ1035
animals were induced to lay eggs by placing them every 12 hr onto
culture plates into which one-tenth volume of 10 mg/ml of
serotonin had been absorbed recently (Trent et al. 1983
), and embryos
laid within the next hour were analyzed. All animals from individual
F1 cohorts with a penetrant pop-1 antisense effect
were analyzed under Nomarski and polarized light optics for the
presence of intestine.
Laser ablation and lineage analysis
Eggs were cut from gravid JJ1035 or MT2560 hermaphrodites. Young
one- to four-cell-stage embryos were collected in M9 and transferred
onto 3% agarose pads, covered with a coverslip, and sealed with
Vaseline according to Sulston et al. (1983)
. A VSL-337 nitrogen laser
(Laser Science, Inc.) attached to a laser ablation unit (Photonic
Instruments, Inc., Arlington Heights, IL) was used for ablations. The E
blastomere was isolated by ablation of ABa, ABp, P2, and MS.
The C blastomere was isolated by ablating ABa, ABp, EMS, and
P3 as described elsewhere (Mello et al. 1992
). Ablations were
performed at 22.5°C-23.5°C. Following ablations, embryos were
incubated in humidity chambers at 22.5°C-23.5°C for 9-12 hr.
Embryos were scored for the presence of intestine, hypodermis, and
muscle under DIC optics by the criteria of Bowerman et al. (1992)
. The
presence of intestine was also independently scored by the
birefringence of gut granules under polarization optics (Laufer et al.
1980
). Embryos were then transferred in M9 to
poly-L-lysine-coated slides for immunostaining. Embryos were
fixed according to Albertson et al. (1978)
, rehydrated in TBS-Tween
20, and stained with two of the following three antibodies diluted in
10% normal goat serum (NGS) for 1 hr: mAb 5.6 (Miller et al. 1983
),
mAb 1CB4 (Okamoto and Thomson 1985
), and rabbit anti-LIN-26 (Labouesse
et al. 1996
). Secondary antibodies were used as follows: sheep
anti-rabbit IgG Cy3 conjugate C-2306 (Sigma), goat anti-mouse IgG, and
IgM fluorescein conjugate AMI0708 (Tago Immunologicals, Camarillo, CA).
Cell lineage analysis (Sulston et al. 1983
) was performed by
four-dimensional time-lapse analysis (Schnabel 1991
; Hird and White
1993
; Moskowitz et al. 1994
). Four-cell embryos were collected after
cutting open gravid heterozygous deficiency mothers in M9 buffer and
mounted on agar pads as described above. Recordings were set up for at
least 3 hr for early lineage analysis. The E lineage analysis in both
unrescued and rescued itDf2 homozygotes was performed from a
6- to 7-hr recording. After recording, the embryos were allowed to
develop on the slide overnight. The homozygous deficiency embryos were
identified according to their characteristic terminal morphology and
the absence of gut granules.
Endpoint mapping of deficiencies by PCR
The endpoints of deficiencies were mapped on the physical map by
using primer sets from the relevant region and PCR (Fig. 6). DNA was
extracted from embryos homozygous for the given deficiency as described
(Williams et al. 1992
) and amplified by PCR with control primers to
confirm the presence of DNA. PCR was performed as described in Williams
et al. (1992)
. Tester primer sets were derived from cDNA sequences that
were available through ACeDB. Primers JZ 7,8 were derived from the cDNA
cm7f6; JZ 17,18 were obtained from org-1 sequence kindly
provided by Dr. Abby Telfer (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia).
Generation of transgenic animals and scoring for rescued animals
Generally, hermaphrodites were injected with a mixture of pRF4
(100 µg/ml) and a test DNA (10 µg/ml) as described by Mello et al. (1991)
.
Transgenic worms were selected based on the expression of the dominant
rol-6 (su1006) gene present in pRF4 that causes worms
to roll; Roller lines were established after two generations of
transmission of the Roller phenotype. For injection of cosmid DNAs,
1-10 µg/ml of cosmid DNA was used together with 100 µg/ml of pRF4 DNA. For each test DNA, multiple Roller
lines were established at 20°C in an itDf2 heterozygous
background (JR70: ced-1; itDf2/unc-42, dpy-21). Rolling itDf2 heterozygous hermaphrodites were
cloned on individual plates and allowed to lay eggs for ~24 hr.
Fourteen to eighteen hours after removing hermaphrodites, arrested
embryos were collected and mounted for Nomarski microscopy to examine for the presence of gut granules and gut cells.
Pools of cosmids were injected into young heterozygous deficiency adults to test for rescuing activity. Three cosmids were found containing the rescuing activity: K10F6, R7, and T26F2. Subclones of K10F6 and the end-1 minigene were also tested for rescuing activity (also see Fig. 6). The number of lines obtained from representative DNA fragments that gave positive rescue and percent rescued homozygous deficiency embryos (number of homozygous mutant embryos containing gut granules out of number of total mutant embryos) were as follows: K10F6, 1 line, 47% (68 of 146); 5.5-kb subclone from K10F6, 5 lines, 50% (11 of 22), 85% (11 of 13), 70% (30 of 43), 32% (20 of 63), 33% (16 of 48); the end-1 minigene construct, 1 line, 65% (15 of 23).
Molecular analyses and cDNA cloning
Standard methods (Sambrook et al. 1989
) were used for molecular
analyses except where indicated. A 5.5-kb KpnI-PstI
fragment from K10F6 was used as a probe to screen an embryonic
gt11 cDNA library (kindly provided by Peter Okkema, University of
Illinois, Chicago). Approximately 400,000 plaques were screened, and 15 positive clones were isolated. The 4-kb rescuing fragment from K10F6
was used as a probe for additional screens. Eight positive clones were
isolated: one with a 2.5-kb insert, three with 1.3-kb inserts, three
with 0.85-kb inserts, and one with a 0.8-kb insert. The 2.5-kb insert
appeared to belong to a unique class and was not studied further. The
other seven clones were partially sequenced. The sequence data
indicated that all seven clones shared the same sequence, although the
1.3-kb clones appear to be chimeric, containing the 0.85-kb sequence at
their 3
end. The smaller clones, 0.8 and 0.85 kb in size, were
identical along most of their lengths. However, the 0.8-kb cDNA lacks
50 bases at its 5
end, and different polyadenylation sites were
apparently used to generate the messages from which these cDNAs were
derived (Fig. 9).
Sequencing of the end-1 clone and 5
end
determination
A series of nested deletions of the 4-kb
KpnI-SacI genomic subclone was made using
exonuclease III and mung bean nuclease according to manufacturer's
protocols (Promega). These deletions were sequenced using Sequenase
(U.S. Biochemical) by the dideoxy chain terminator method (Sanger et
al. 1977
). Some sequences were determined by the University of
Wisconsin Genetics Center Program Automatic Sequencing Facility. Both
strands of the 4-kb genomic fragment and cDNA were sequenced.
To determine the 5
end of the end-1 gene, 5
-RACE was
perfomed with Marathon RACE-PCR kit (Clonetech). Total RNA was
prepared from mixed stage wild-type C. elegans embryos and
poly(A)+ RNA was selected using the Oligotex kit (Qiagen), according
to manufacturer's instructions. The mRNA was used as a template in the
Marathon RACE-PCR. Sequence containing the 5
end of
end-1 was amplified by PCR and subcloned into the pT7 blueT
vector (Novagen). Sequence analysis was performed using the BLAST
program (Altschul et al. 1990
) within the Genetics Computer Group
package (Madison, WI). The longest clone amplified by 5
-RACE
contained an extra 5 nucleotides at the 5
end relative to the
0.85-kb clone. Hence, full-length end-1 transcripts start at
or very close to this position. They appear not to be
trans-spliced, as was further confirmed by RT-PCR analysis
using primers specific for the SL1 and SL2 leaders (Krause and Hirsh
1987
; Bektesh et al. 1988
; Zorio et al. 1994
) (data not shown).
Northern blot analysis
Hypochlorite treatment was used to obtain early embryos for RNA
extraction. Briefly, 6-8 ml of N2 gravid adults were collected from
50- to 100-mm plates. Worm pellets were washed several times with M9
buffer. Ten milliliters of hypochlorite solution (1 N NaOH,
one-tenth commercial Clorox in H2O) per ml of worm pellet was
used to treat the adult worms at room temperature for ~10 min. After
resuspending in 5 ml of M9 buffer, embryos were spun down at 3K for 1 min. The pellet was washed several times with M9 buffer. Embryos were
frozen at
70°C until needed.
Total RNA was prepared as described by Austin and Kimble (1989)
.
Poly(A)+ RNA was prepared using oligo(dT) Oligotex combi kit,
according to the manufacturer's protocols (Qiagen). Northern blot
analysis was performed by electrophoresing 2.5 µg of poly(A)+
mRNA on 1% agarose-formaldehyde gels according to standard protocols. The end-1 cDNA insert from pJZ10 was used as a template to
generate the DNA probe using the Prime-a-gene kit (Promega).
Hybridization and washes were performed at 48°C.
In situ hybridization to end-1 RNA
In situ hybridization was performed as described (Seydoux and
Fire 1994
). N2 embryos were collected by hypochlorite treatment as
described above. Embryos were then mounted on poly-L-lysine slides and processed as described. Herring sperm DNA (10 µg/ml) was used in place of salmon sperm DNA. An
end-1 cDNA clone, pJZ10, was linearized with HindIII
for the T3 primer to generate the sense probe and PstI for the
T7 primer to generate the antisense probe. Undiluted probes were used
in all in situ experiments. Alkaline phosphatase detection reactions
were allowed to proceed at room temperature for 1.5 hr.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We are grateful to S. Gendreau for isolating wDf3 and wDf4, two deficiencies used in this study. We thank M. Labouesse for LIN-26 antibody, J. Shaw, K. Kemphues, and B. Meyer for deficiency strains, A. Telfer for ogr-1 primers, R. Lin for pop-1 antisense RNA, P. Okkema for the cDNA library, A. Coulson and the C. elegans genome consortium for all cosmids used, and J. Kimble's and P. Anderson's laboratories for valuable discussions, advice, and use of equipment. We thank Bill Smith and members of the Rothman laboratory for insightful discussions and comments on the manuscript. Some of the strains used in this work were provided by the Caenorhabditis Genetics Center, which is funded by the National Center for Research Resources of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). P.H. was supported by an NIH Cell and Molecular Biology Predoctoral Training Grant. A.S. was supported by a Human Frontiers Science Program Organization fellowship, a Naito Foundation fellowship, and a Leukemia Society of America Special Fellowship. R.H. was supported by a fellowship from the Jane Coffin Childs Memorial Fund for Cancer Research. This work was supported by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute to J.R.P. and by grants from the NIH (GM 48137), the National Science Foundation (IBN-9506089), the March of Dimes, a Searle Scholars Award from the Chicago Community Trust, and a Shaw Scientists Award from the Milwaukee Foundation to J.H.R.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 USC section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| |
Note added in proof |
|---|
The GenBank accession no. for end-1 is AF026555.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Received May 12, 1997; revised version accepted August 27, 1997.
5 Present address: Department of Biophysics and Biochemistry, School of Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113 Japan.
6 Corresponding author.
E-MAIL rothman{at}lifesci.lscf.ucsb.edu; FAX (805) 893-4724.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|