|
|
|
Vol. 11, No. 24, pp. 3387-3400, December 15, 1997
Department of Biophysics, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Kitashirakawa-Oiwake, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606, Japan
| |
Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Fission yeast Cut5/Rad4 plays a unique role in the genome maintenance as it is required for replication, replication checkpoint, and normal UV sensitivity. It is unknown, however, how Cut5 protein is linked to other checkpoint proteins, and what part it plays in replication and UV sensitivity. Here we report that Cut5 interacts with a novel checkpoint protein Crb2 and that this interaction is needed for normal genome maintenance. The carboxyl terminus of Crb2 resembles yeast Rad9 and human 53BP1 and BRCA1. Crb2 is required for checkpoint arrests induced by irradiation and polymerase mutations, but not for those induced by inhibited nucleotide supply. Upon UV damage, Crb2 is transiently modified, probably phosphorylated, with a similar timing of phosphorylation in Chk1 kinase, which is reported to restrain Cdc2 activation. Crb2 modification requires other damage-sensing checkpoint proteins but not Chk1, suggesting that Crb2 acts at the upstream of Chk1. The modified Crb2 exists as a slowly sedimenting form, whereas Crb2 in undamaged cells is in a rapidly sedimenting structure. Cut5 and Crb2 interact with Chk1 in a two-hybrid system. Moreover, moderate overexpression of Chk1 suppresses the phenotypes of cut5 and crb2 mutants. Cut5, Crb2, and Chk1 thus may form a checkpoint sensor-transmitter pathway to arrest the cell cycle.
[Key Words: UV damage; hydroxyurea; DNA polymerase; phosphorylation; two-hybrid screen]
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The eukaryotic genome is maintained by a number of controlling
elements. Weinert and Hartwell (1988)
identified a
checkpoint gene RAD9 in the budding yeast Saccharomyces
cerevisiae, which monitors the damage of DNA on UV irradiation, and
delays the progression of cell cycle. In the absence of the
RAD9 function, cells containing the damaged DNAs enter fatal
cell division without a delay. A number of checkpoint genes involved in
DNA damage, replication, and spindle defects have been identified
(e.g., Elledge 1996
; Kitazono and Matsumoto 1997). The word checkpoint
in the present paper is used as synonymous to a surveillance mechanism
that blocks or delays cell-cycle transitions (Nasmyth 1996
). Cell-cycle
regulators are also important elements in maintenance of the genome.
When the mitotic cyclin gene, cdc13+, is lost in the
fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, cells are unable to
enter mitosis but perform repeated DNA replications, leading to the
formation of polyploidy giant nucleus (Hayles et al. 1994
). Similar
phenotypes can be produced by overproducing Rum1, the inhibitor for
CDK/cyclin B (Moreno and Nurse 1994
) or constitutively
activating Cdc18, an essential replication initiation factor (Kelly et
al. 1993
; Nishitani and Nurse 1995
). In mammalian cells, the genome is
maintained by tumor-suppressing proteins such as p53 and RB. p53 is a
transcription factor, activating transcription of certain inhibitors
against CDK kinase on DNA damage, leading to the arrest of cells in the
G1 phase (e.g., El-Deiry et al. 1993
). If p53 is lost, the
damage checkpoint in the G1 phase no longer seems to be
functional. These various gene functions contribute to the quality
control of genome.
The fission yeast cut5+ gene is uniquely implicated in the
genome maintenance as it is essential for DNA replication, replication checkpoint control, and normal UV sensitivity (Saka et al. 1994a
;b). Temperature-sensitive cut5 mutants at the restrictive
temperature (36°C) block DNA replication but enter mitosis,
producing the cut phenotype (Saka and Yanagida 1993
), which strikingly
differs from the arrest phenotype of temperature sensitive cdc
mutations in DNA polymerase or ligase, or ribonucleotide reductase
(RNR) (Nurse et al. 1976
; Gordon and Fantes 1986
). The cell-cycle
arrest of these replication-defective cdc mutants is caused by
the replication checkpoint control that also operates in the presence
of hydroxyurea (HU), an inhibitor of RNR. The double-mutants between
cut5 and polymerase or ligase mutants also displayed no
retardation in cell division at 36°C (Saka et al. 1994a
;b). These
results showed that Cut5 was required for the replication checkpoint
arrest induced by HU or mutations in the replication enzymes. In
S. pombe, the HU-induced replication checkpoint arrest is also
abolished in hus and certain rad mutants, rad1,
rad3, rad9, rad17, and rad26 (Al-Khodairy and Carr 1992
;
Enoch et al. 1992
; Rowley et al. 1992
; Sheldrick and Carr 1993
; Ford et
al. 1994
; Griffiths et al. 1995
; Bentley et al. 1996
; Lieberman et al.
1996
; Kostrub et al. 1997
).
In addition to the phenotypes described above, cut5 mutants
are sensitive to UV irradiation at the permissive temperature. Consistent with the phenotype, isolation of the cut5+ gene
(Saka and Yanagida 1993
) indicated that it was identical to
rad4+ (Duck et al. 1976
; Fenech et al. 1991
). All
cut5/rad4 mutants were found to be UV sensitive
(Duck et al. 1976
; Saka and Yanagida 1993
; Saka et al. 1994a
).
Intriguingly, however, the UV- or 4NQO-induced checkpoint control was
retained in cut5 mutants even at 36°C (Saka et al. 1994a
,b
;
F. Esashi, Y. Saka, and M. Yanagida, unpubl.).
Cut5 may sense the replication defect and generate a signal to delay
the cell cycle. Multiple phenotypes of cut5 in replication and
damage, however, are intriguing, and the actual molecular role of Cut5
in maintaining the genome is unknown. In this study, we addressed the
question of what kind of proteins interact with Cut5. Identification of
the interacting proteins should shed light on how Cut5 protein
functions within cells. Cut5 is a 74-kD nuclear protein consisting of
several regions (Saka et al. 1994a
). The amino-terminal 100 amino acids
long motif repeats twice, and is similar to the regions found in the
human repair protein XRCC1 (Thompson et al. 1990
), the oncoprotein Ect1
(Miki et al. 1993
) and the yeast protein Rev1 (Larimer et al. 1989
).
This region may serve as the site for protein-protein interaction. The
S. cerevisiae Dpb11 (Araki et al. 1995
), a suppressor for
mutations in an essential subunit of DNA Pol II (epsilon) has a weak
resemblance to Cut5.
An initial investigation for searching Cut5-interacting proteins by the
two-hybrid screen method (Fields and Song 1989
) indicated that the GAL4
DNA-binding domain (GAL4D) fused to full-length Cut5 activated
transcription without the activation domain. Therefore, Cut5 was
divided into several regions and each of the regions was used as bait.
We identified a novel gene product Crb2, which interacts specifically
with the amino-terminal region of Cut5. The deletion of the
crb2+ gene profoundly affects checkpoint control induced by
UV as well as DNA polymerase mutations. Crb2 is modified on DNA damage,
and appears to mediate the signal for arrest of the cell cycle through Chk1, a protein kinase which restrains the activation of Cdc2 kinase by
regulating phosphorylation of Tyr15 (Walworth et al. 1993
; Walworth and
Bernards 1996
; O'Connell et al. 1997
; Rhind et al. 1997
).
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Mutations of cut5/rad4 in the conserved amino-terminus
To locate an essential region in Cut5, we determined mutation
sites of cut5. The mutant gene was amplified from three
cut5/rad4 alleles [rad4-116; Duck et
al. (1976)
; cut5-580, Hirano et al. (1986)
;
cut5-T401, Samejima et al. (1993)
] by PCR and sequenced. Surprisingly, all three mutations contained the same substitution at
the 45th codon (from ACG to ATG), leading to the amino acid change T45M
(Fig. 1A). An additional alteration (resulting in K62Q) was present in cut5-T401. The T45M mutation should
create a new EcoT22I site (ATGCAT, Fig. 1B). This was
verified by Southern hybridization (Fig. 1B, right), which produced
expected sizes of the EcoT22I fragments for the mutant genomic
DNAs. The T45M mutation resided in the middle of the first
amino-terminal repeat R1 (consensus is indicated in the bottom of panel
A; Saka et al. 1994b
). T45 is present within the conserved stretch
(consensus, VTHLIA), hereafter designated as the TH domain.
|
Isolation of Crb2
For the two-hybrid screening method (Fields and Song 1989
), five
constructs (Fig. 1C) were made as bait, each of which contained a
region of Cut5 fused to the GAL4DB. GAL4DB-R1R2 thus contained the R1
and R2 region, and so on. More than 1 × 106 S. pombe cDNA clones were screened for each plasmid. Two identical clones (designated crb2+,
cut5-repeat binding) were
obtained by the bait of R1R2, whereas eight identical clones
(crb3+) were isolated by the bait of R3. Combinations of
R1R2 and Crb2, and of R3 and Crb3, produced
-galactosidase
activities (Fig. 2A), respectively, as strong as the
control interaction (p53 and T-antigen). Other control combinations
showed low activities. The interaction of Cut5 with Crb2 or Crb3 was
specific as seen by pairwise combinations (Fig. 2B;
-galactosidase
positives are blue). No other positive clone was obtained by the screen
with the other baits.
|
Interaction of Crb2 with Cut5
An in vitro-binding assay described below supported a direct interaction between Crb2 and Cut5. The cDNAs of Crb2 and Crb3 were expressed under the T7 promoter by the in vitro reticulocyte lysate system by use of [35S]methionine for labeling Crb2 and Crb3 (Fig. 2C, left; luciferase was also labeled as control). To examine binding, GST-R1R2 and GST-R3 fusion proteins produced in Escherichia coli and purified by glutathione-agarose beads were incubated with 35S-labeled proteins. The beads were washed, and bound labeled proteins were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and autoradiography (Fig. 2C; right). Radiolabeled Crb2 and Crb3 were detected to be bound to GST-R1R2 and R3, respectively, but luciferase was not. A Crb2 fragment cleaved during incubation was also efficiently bound to GST-R1R2. Another control with the beads containing only GST showed that neither bound Crb2 nor Crb3.
To examine whether mutant Cut5T45M retains the ability to interact with Crb2, the mutant R1R2 was isolated and fused to the GAL4DB. Two-hybrid interaction between Crb2 and mutant R1R2 was completely abolished at both 26°C and 36°C (Fig. 2D). Interaction of Cut5 with Crb2, at least at the level of the two-hybrid system, thus requires the TH domain.
Crb2 resembles Rad9 and p53-binding protein
An S. pombe cosmid that contained the genomic
crb2+ gene was isolated with cDNA as the probe.
Hybridization to an ordered cosmid bank indicated that
crb2+ was located near nda2+ in the left arm of
chromosome II (Mizukami et al. 1993
). The 9-kb PstI fragment
containing crb2+ was subcloned from the cosmid (the map
shown in Fig. 3A). Plasmid carrying crb2+
(pFE15) fully suppressed the UV sensitivity of cut5-T401 at
26°C, and this suppression was employed for subcloning of
crb2+ (+ indicates suppression). The same plasmid,
however, did not suppress the temperature sensitive phenotype of
cut5-T401 at 36°C (data not shown).
|
Sequencing showed that crb2+ encodes a 778 amino acid
protein (predicted molecular mass of 87.5 kD; database accession no. D86478). The near amino-terminal region is required for interacting with Cut5 (data not shown). Database search revealed the highest scores
for Rad9 of S. cerevisiae (Weinert and Hartwell 1988
) and human 53BP1, which interacts with p53 (Iwabuchi et al. 1994
). The
carboxy-terminal region of Crb2 is ~30% and 25% identical to that
of Rad9 and 53BP1, respectively. Crb2 is also similar to the carboxyl
terminus of BRCA1, a mammary cancer gene, and other repair and
cancer-related genes (Koonin et al. 1996
; Callebaut and Mornon 1997). A
common domain termed BRCT was proposed from detailed sequence analyses
(Bork et al. 1997
); a number of damage-responsive proteins including
Cut5 also contained the BRCT motif (Fig. 3D). The BRCT-containing
domain in BRCA1 is implicated in transcriptional activation.
Crb3 is a WD repeat containing protein
The nucleotide sequence of Crb3 cDNA has been determined (database
accession no. D45883): crb3+ encodes a protein with the WD
repeats (Neer et al. 1994
) partly resembling
-transducin (Fig.
4). The predicted sequence contains 446 amino acids
(calculated molecular mass of, 49.5 kD) with 6 WD repeats. It is an
essential protein for viability and may be implicated in the
G1/S progression (T. Matsusaka and M. Yanagida, unpubl.). Structure and functional analyses of the crb3+
gene will be described elsewhere.
|
Identification and localization of Crb2
Rabbit antibodies against Crb2 were affinity-purified for
detection of Crb2 in S. pombe extracts. Diffused immunoblot
bands were obtained at the position of ~100-110 kD (Fig. 5A, lane
2), the intensity of which increased in cells
carrying plasmid pCRB2 (lane 3), but which were absent in
crb2 strain (lane 1). These diffuse bands may be caused
by post-translational modification (see below).
|
Jellyfish green fluorescence protein (GFP) was tagged to the
amino-terminus of Crb2 under a moderate promoter REP41 and used to
determine intracellular localization of Crb2 (Figure 5B). The nuclear
chromatin region (verified by double stain with DAPI; data not shown)
showed green fluorescence when the promoter was repressed in the
presence of thiamine (+Thi). When Crb2 was mildly overproduced in
the absence of thiamine (
Thi), the same nuclear region was
intensely fluorescent. Hence, Crb2 appears to be a nuclear chromatin
protein like Cut5 (Saka et al. 1994
). We have been unsuccessful in
detecting the stable complex formation between Cut5 and Crb2 in S. pombe extracts, however. Immunoprecipitation by anti-cut5
antibodies was performed under different buffer conditions. Cut5 was
clearly detected in the precipitates, whereas Crb2 was not (data not
shown). Conversely, Crb2 was immunoprecipitated by anti-crb2
antibodies, but Cut5 was not detected in the precipitates.
Hypermodification of Crb2 upon irradiation
We examined whether Crb2 was further modified after cells were UV irradiated (100 J/m2) at 26°C. Additional upper bands (apparent molecular mass of 120-150 kD) became visible, greatly intensified after 1-2 hr, and diminished after 4-5 hr (Fig. 5C, top). This transient band-shift clearly indicated the occurrence of strong post-translational modification in Crb2 after irradiation. The intensity of 74-kD Cut5 increased (approximately two-fold) after irradiation (Fig. 5C; second panel).
Chk1 kinase has been reported to be transiently phosphorylated in UV
irradiated cells (Walworth and Bernards 1996
). We compared the timing
of Crb2 band-shift with that of Chk1 phosphorylation by immunoblot with
anti-HA antibodies and a strain integrated with the HA-tagged
chk1+ gene (a kind gift of Dr. N. Walworth, Robert Wood
Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ; this strain was also used to
obtain data for Crb2 modification described above). The upper
phosphorylated band of Chk1 was seen at approximately the same timing
(Fig. 5C, third panel) as Crb2 modification. Cdc2 detected by
anti-PSTAIRE antibodies was shown as control (Fig. 5C, bottom panel).
UV irradiation thus induced a change in Crb2 during the arrest of cell
cycle (see below).
We examined whether this 120- to 150-kD super-band shift required the
presence of other damage checkpoint genes. Extracts of wild type,
cut5-T401,
chk1, rad1-1,
rad3,
rad9,
rad17, and
rad26 were prepared before (
) and 1 hr
after (+) UV irradiation at 26°C and immunoblotted with anti-crb2
antibodies (Fig. 5D). The 120- to 150-kD band shift of Crb2 after
irradiation was observed in
chk1 deleted cells
and also in cut5-T401 (the level in cut5 somewhat
reduced) but not in other checkpoint mutants, suggesting that the
damage-sensing checkpoint genes, Rad1, Rad3, Rad9, Rad17, and Rad26,
were needed to modify Crb2 upon irradiation.
We wanted to know whether the band shift of Crb2 was produced by
phosphorylation, and performed phosphatase treatment of UV irradiated
cell extracts as described in Walworth and Bernards (1996)
at 30°C
and 0°C. The intensity of the unmodified sharp 100-kD band clearly
increased after the phosphatase treatment at 30°C (Fig. 5E, second
lane). The control Chk1 was also dephosphorylated after phosphatase
treatment. The upper 110-kD and 120- to 150-kD bands of Crb2 thus
formed at least partly because of phosphorylation. Crb2 in
nonirradiating cells thus appeared to be already phosphorylated and
this phosphorylation was greatly enhanced further following UV
irradiation. This hypermodification of Crb2 is not caused by the
cell-cycle arrest, because it did not occur in G2-arrested cdc25 mutant cells (data not shown). UV-induced DNA damage is probably the direct cause of this hypermodification.
To know whether Crb2 and Cut5 were present in monomeric or oligomeric
complexes, sucrose gradient centrifugation of S. pombe extracts was run to determine the sedimentation profiles of Crb2 and
Cut5 (Fig. 5F). Cell extracts were first centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for
20 min, and the supernatants were overlaid on the top of a 15%-40%
linear gradient, followed by centrifugation at 40,000 rpm for 12 hr. A
broad peak ranging from 20S to the near bottom of the centrifugal tube
(>50S) was obtained by immunoblot with anti-crb2 antibodies (Fig.
5F, top panel,
-Crb2), suggesting that Crb2 was associated with
relatively large heterogenously sized particles in extracts. For Cut5,
the native 74-kD band was also present in the heavy fractions, whereas
the cleaved 61-kD band (Saka et al. 1974) sedimented much more slowly
(
-Cut5). The cleavage of 74-kD Cut5 occurs during extract
preparations and centrifugations, and is difficult to control; the
cleaved 61-kD Cut5 band is enriched in slowly sedimenting fractions.
Chk1 kinase sedimented very broadly from the top to the bottom of
sucrose gradient (
-HA). Fractions of Crb2, Cut5, and Chk1 thus
sedimented as large structures though they did not form any
cosedimenting peak.
Sedimentation profiles in cell extracts prepared 1 hr after UV
irradiation (100 J/m2) differed strikingly from
those in nonirradiated cells. The modified forms of Crb2 sedimented
very slowly at ~3-5S (Fig. 5F, bottom panel,
-Crb2), and the
upper band of Chk1 was also present in the slowly sedimenting
fractions. Cut5 showed a broad profile, with a small fraction also
present in the slowly sedimenting fractions. These results strongly
suggested that the modified populations of Cut5, Crb2, and Chk1 were
dissociated from the larger complexes after UV irradiation. We did
immunoprecipitation of the upper slowly-sedimenting fractions after UV
irradiation using antibodies against Crb2, Cut5, and Chk1, and could
detect respective immunoprecipitated proteins, but were not able to
detect coimmunoprecipitation with others under the conditions employed
(data not shown).
crb2 null is sensitive to UV and HU
The genomic copy of crb2+ was disrupted (Fig.
6A, Materials and Methods). Resulting heterozygous
diploids produced all four spores that were viable in each tetrad,
while Ura+ and Ura
segregated 2 : 2. The crb2+
gene is thus not essential for viability. The gene disruption was
confirmed by genomic Southern hybridization of haploid segregants (Fig.
6B) and the lack of protein confirmed by immunoblotting (Fig. 5A, lane
1). Haploid crb2 null cells (designated
crb2) divide normally as do wild type at both
26°C and 36°C in minimal or rich culture medium, with a slightly
longer generation time (3.4 hr) than wild type (2.9 hr at 26°C in
YPD).
crb2 cells showed no anomaly in DNA
content as determined by FACScan analysis (data not shown).
|
We found that
crb2 deletion was both UV and HU
sensitive (Fig. 6B,C,D). It was more UV sensitive than cut5
(Saka et al. 1993
). This UV hypersensitivity of
crb2 was suppressed by plasmid pCRB2 but not by
pCUT5 (Fig. 7C).
crb2 was
also HU sensitive and its sensitivity was similar to that of
cdc2-3w (Fig 6D).
|
UV damage checkpoint is abolished in
crb2
We examined whether UV-induced damage checkpoint was retained in
crb2 cells. When wild-type cells were
irradiated with UV (100 J/m2 at 26°C), their
mitotic entry was greatly delayed, and cell number increase was
arrested (Fig. 7A, WT). The septation index (SI) decreased for ~2 hr
because of the activation of damage checkpoint control (Al-Khodairy and
Carr 1992
; Rowley et al. 1992
). The damage checkpoint mutant
rad1-1, however, did not show such delay nor a decrease in SI.
We found that
crb2 also lost the delay, basicly showing the identical damage phenotype to that of rad1-1 (Fig. 7A).
UV-irradiated wild-type cells are known to be elongated with the single
nucleus (Fig. 6B, 2 hr after irradiation). In sharp contrast, after
irradiation
crb2 and rad1-1 cells were
divided and the septated cells, with occasional cut phenotype, were
frequently seen. The deletion of crb2+ thus led to loss of
the cell-cycle arrest in response to UV irradiation. The UV sensitivity
of the double mutant cut5
crb2 was identical to
crb2, and its UV-induced checkpoint control was
also abolished (data not shown).
Polymerase mutant-induced arrest abolished in
crb2
We wanted to know whether the cell-cycle arrest phenotypes of
polymerase mutants at 36°C were maintained in the absence of crb2+. Double-mutants were constructed by crossing of
crb2 with cdc6-121, swi7-H4, or
cdc20-M10 (Singh and Klar 1993
; Francesconi et al. 1995
;
Murakami and Okayama 1995
). These single polymerase mutants (
,
, and
) were arrested at 36°C and the SI decreased (Fig. 7C). The double-mutants, however, were not arrested at 36°C, and the
level of SI remained the same after the temperature-shift. The
double-mutant cells frequently displayed the cut phenotype at 36°C
for 4 hr (Fig. 7D, right), whereas single mutant cells were elongated
with the single nucleus (left). Checkpoint control was thus lost if the
crb2+ gene was disrupted in the polymerase mutants at
36°C. The phenotype of the other double-mutant with
cdc17-K42 (defective in DNA ligase) was also examined. The
arrest phenotype was abolished in the double-mutant (data not shown).
We concluded from these results that Crb2 was required for the
cell-cycle arrest induced by defects in the replication machinery
enzymes.
Nucleotide pool-dependent replication checkpoint retained in
crb2
We then determined whether the HU-induced arrest was maintained in
crb2. In sharp contrast to the results with
polymerase mutations,
crb2 cells were arrested
in the presence of HU (+HU) at 36°C (Fig. 8A).
crb2 cells in the presence of HU were elongated with the single nucleus as wild-type cells, and did not show the cut phenotype (right panel). The SI index was strikingly
lowered (data not shown). Similar results were obtained at 26°C
(data not shown). The HU-induced cell-cycle arrest was thus completely retained in
crb2.
|
Basically the same result was obtained for the double mutant
crb2 temperature sensitive cdc22. The
cdc22+ gene encodes the large subunit of ribonucleotide
reductase (Gordon and Fantes 1986
; Fernandez-Sarabia et al. 1993
), and
is known to be directly inhibited by HU. The double mutant
crb2 cdc22 grew normally at 26°C, and was
arrested at 36°C, displaying the identical arrest phenotypes of
HU-added
crb2 or single cdc22 mutant
cells (Fig. 8B). These results established that the cell-cycle arrest
induced by HU or cdc22 mutation did not require Crb2.
Interaction of crb2+ with other checkpoint genes
We examined whether the UV sensitivity of
crb2 can be suppressed by overexpression of
other checkpoint genes. For this purpose, plasmids carrying
crb2+, cut5+, rad1+,
rad3+, rad9+, rad17+,
rad26+, or
chk1+/rad27+ (Al-Khodairy and
Carr 1992
; Rowley et al. 1992
; Sheldrick and Carr 1993
; Al-Khodairy et
al. 1994
) placed at the downstream of the moderate promoter REP41 (a
generous gift of Dr. A.M. Carr, Medical Research Council Cell Mutation
Unit, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK, except for the first two
strains constructed in the present study) were introduced into
crb2, cut5-T401 and
chk1 strains, and the UV-sensitive
phenotype of transformants was investigated. The results are
summarized in Table 1. None of the damage-sensing checkpoint genes (rad1+, rad3+,
rad9+, rad17+, rad26+) could
suppress the UV sensitivity of
crb2, cut5-T401,
and
chk1. In contrast, moderate overexpression
of Chk1 kinase, a checkpoint signal transmitter, suppressed the UV
phenotype of
crb2 (see Fig. 6C) and
cut5-T401. Moreover, pCRB2 suppressed the UV sensitivity of
cut5, but pCUT5 suppressed neither
crb2 nor
chk1. These
results suggested that Crb2 played an upstream role for Chk1 and acted at the downstream of, or parallel to, other checkpoint gene products in
the UV damage-signaling pathway (see Discussion).
|
Interactions of Chk1 with Crb2 and Cut5
More evidence for genetic interactions among Crb2, Cut5, and Chk1
was obtained in following experiments. HU, as well as UV, sensitivities
were examined for
crb2 or
chk1 carrying multicopy vector plasmid (1, 2 in
Fig. 9A), pCHK1(3,4), pCRB2 (5,6), or pCUT5 (7,8).
These plasmid-borne cells were spotted after dilution, and cultured at
26°C with the addition of HU to the medium (right, HU) or the
pretreatment by UV irradiation (100 J/m2, UV,
middle, +UV) as control. pCHK1 suppressed the HU-phenotype of
crb2, whereas pCRB2 did not suppress that of
chk1.
|
We wanted to know whether the loss of UV-induced checkpoint arrest in
crb2 could be restored by moderate
overproduction of Chk1 (Fig. 9B). REP41, a moderate inducible promoter,
was derepressed in the absence of thiamine (
Thi). The ability to
arrest cells following UV damage was restored in
crb2 cells that overexpressed Chk1 (
Thi;
shown by a temporal decrease of the SI) but not in cells without
overproduction (+Thi), showing that moderate overexpression of Chk1
also suppressed the loss of damage checkpoint. Hence, the UV-induced
checkpoint is partly restored in
crb2 mutant by overproducing Chk1, suggesting that the gene product other than Crb2
might be able to activate Chk1, but in a way much less efficiently.
We found that phosphorylation of Chk1 after UV irradiation required
functional Crb2. The upper band of Chk1 formed 1 hr after UV
irradiation at 26°C (+UV) in wild type and cut5 mutant
cells but did not in
crb2 (Fig. 9C, +UV);
the intensity of Chk1 upper band in cut5 mutant was
significantly reduced, however. However, after UV irradiation, Crb2 may
become essential for cells to survive by sending a signal for Chk1
phosphorylation, that leads to the accumulation of activated Chk1
(Walworth and Bernards 1996
).
Moreover, strong two-hybrid interactions existed between Chk1 and Crb2 and between Chk1 and the central region (Acidic R3R4) of Cut5 (Fig. 9D). The degree of interactions were the highest for Chk1 and Crb2, whereas the interaction between Chk1 and the region of Cut5 spanning from the acidic to R3R4 region (acidicR3R4) was high. No two-hybrid interaction was found between Chk1 and R1R2 of Cut5, however. The interaction between Chk1 and R3R4 of Cut5 was relatively weak. Immunoprecipitation experiments, however, did not show the presence of a detectable stable complex. Neither Chk1 and Crb2, nor Chk1 and Cut5, existed as the stable complex in cell extracts.
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We report in this study (1) identification and characterization of crb2+, an S. pombe checkpoint gene, which is required for both DNA damage and replication machinery checkpoint; and (2) interactions among three checkpoint gene products Cut5, Crb2, and Chk1 for proper maintenance of the genome. Cut5 and Crb2 contain BRCT-motif present in a number of damage-responsive proteins, whereas Chk1 is a protein kinase. Although the stable complex has not been detected in S. pombe extracts, evidence for their putative direct interaction is presented. Functions of Crb2 and Cut5 are distinct, but overlapping. Crb2 is responsive to the DNA damage, whereas Cut5 responds to the impaired precursor nucleotide supply for replication. Both Crb2 and Cut5, however, are required for the checkpoint response to defects in DNA polymerases and ligase. Cut5 and Crb2 may act as sensors that sense damage and/or replication defect, and generate signals to activate Chk1 for regulating Cdc2. Thus, Cut5, Crb2, and Chk1 may form a checkpoint sensor-transmitter pathway to arrest the cell cycle.
The present paper also shows that replication checkpoints present in
S. pombe may be categorized into two classes: one caused by
the defect in replication machinery (mutations in polymerases and
ligase), and the other caused by the inhibition of normal nucleotide
supply (HU and cdc22 mutation). Crb2 is required only for the
former, but Cut5 is necessary for both (Saka et al. 1994a
,b
). A
possible explanation for this difference is that the mutant polymerase
and ligase enzymes may synthesize bad or damaged DNAs that are sensed
by Crb2, whereas such bad DNAs are not made in HU-arrested cells. This
implies that Crb2 may monitor the damaged DNAs accumulated during the S
phase, consistent with the concept that DNA damage causes replication
to be blocked (Paulovich and Hartwell 1995
).
Chk1 appeared to act at the downstream of Crb2 and Cut5 as a checkpoint
signal transmitter. This hypothesis explains a number of results
presented in this paper (Table 1; Figs. 5, 6, and 9). Consistent with
this hypothesis, Chk1 is required not only for the damage checkpoint
(Walworth et al. 1993
; Al-Khodairy et al. 1994
) but also for the
replication checkpoint (Francesconi et al. 1997
). Cdc2 kinase is
affected by Chk1, which was recently shown to regulate Tyr15
phosphorylation of Cdc2 through Cdc25 and/or Wee1
(O'Connell et al. 1997
; Rhind et al. 1997
).
We showed that a fraction of Crb2 was transiently modified, probably
phosphorylated, after UV irradiation. In sucrose gradient centrifugation, the modified Crb2 was slowly sedimenting, possibly released from the large complex structures. Similarly, the
phosphorylated form of Chk1 kinase, which was reported to be activated
by autophosphorylation when damaged (Walworth and Bernards 1996
), was
also present in the slowly sedimenting fractions. We speculate that
damage leads to Crb2 modification, and the modified Crb2 can produce a
signal to activate Chk1, possibly by direct interaction. This
hypothesis is consistent with two-hybrid interaction, the suppression
of
crb2 by the elevated gene dosage of
chk1+ and the absence of Chk1 phosphorylation in
crb2 cells. The occurrence of Crb2 modification
induced by damage in
chk1 cells supports the
upstream nature of Crb2 to Chk1.
Following UV irradiation, the products of the damage-sensing checkpoint
genes (rad1+, rad3+, rad9+,
rad17+, and rad26+; Al-Khodairy et al. 1994
)
may act in conjunction with Crb2 to generate the signal for the
cell-cycle block. Functional relationship between Crb2 and these five
checkpoint genes is unclear. The fact that Crb2 is not modified upon UV
irradiation in these rad mutants and that plasmids carrying
any one of these rad+ genes fail to suppress the UV
phenotype of
crb2 cells suggests that Crb2
functions in the downstream of these Rad gene products. Crb2 may be
activated by the Rad gene products. It is also possible, however, that
Crb2 independently senses damaged DNAs and sends an essential signal
for promoting cell-cycle arrest, separately from the Rad genes. A more
complex relationship is likely, as pCRB2 can suppress the UV
sensitivity of rad1-1, but not that of rad3, rad9, or
rad17 mutants (F. Esashi and M. Yanagida, unpubl.). Crb2 may
thus have a close functional link to Rad1. The S. cerevisiae Rad17, an S. pombe Rad1 homolog, has an exonuclease activity
to produce a gap in DNA and plays an important role in the damage checkpoint (Lyddall and Weinert 1995; Nugent et al. 1996
).
The predicted amino acid sequence of Crb2 is significantly similar to
the budding yeast Rad9 (Weinert and Hartwell 1988
; Hartwell and Weinert
1989
) that acts in the processing of DNA damage for repair (Lydall and
Weinert 1995
), as a component in the sensor/transducer pathway of UV damage outside of S phase (Navas et al. 1996
). However, the similarity between budding yeast Rad9 and fission yeast Crb2 is
restricted to the carboxyl termini. Hence, RAD9 and
crb2+ are unlikely to be true homologs. Elevated dosage of
the budding yeast RAD9 or the fission yeast crb2+
gene introduced into the fission yeast
crb2 or
the budding yeast rad9 mutant, respectively, did not suppress
the UV sensitivity (S. Mochida and M. Yanagida, unpubl.).
Mammalian proteins involved in oncogenesis, 53BP1 (Iwabuchi et al.
1994
) and BRCA1 (Koonin et al. 1996
), contain regions similar to the
carboxyl termini of Crb2. 53BP1 binds to a tumor suppressor protein p53
by the two-hybrid method, and the carboxyl terminus of 53BP1 is the
site for binding to p53 (Iwabuchi et al. 1994
). Mutations in BRCA1 lead
to familial breast and ovarian cancers. The common carboxyl terminal
motifs present in Crb2, Rad9, 53BP1, and BRCA1 (and other related
proteins, Koonin et al. 1996
) may be the sites for interaction with
proteins implicated in the maintenance of the genome in response to
damages. It is of considerable interest to determine whether any
protein bound to the carboxyl terminus of Crb2 exists in fission yeast,
and whether such protein(s) is a transcription factor sharing a
property with p53.
During the preparation of this paper, Wilson et al. (1997)
reported
that one of the fission yeast methylmethane sulfonate (MMS)-sensitive
alleles, rhp9+, was required for the DNA damage checkpoint
but not the replication checkpoint. Comparison of the sequences
indicated that Rhp9 was identical to Crb2. Though their conclusion
apparently differed from ours, the experimental results on
rhp9 null were not inconsistent with ours, because only the
replication checkpoint induced by HU was investigated for rhp9
null. Crb2/Rhp9 may respond to a variety of DNA toxins.
XRCC1, a human repair protein, the amino acid sequence of which partly
resembles Cut5, plays a scaffold role in interactions with polymerase
and ligase III (Kubota et al. 1996
). Cut5 might also have a
scaffold structure, which makes complex regulations possible through
protein-protein interactions. The amino-terminal T45, which appears to
be necessary for interacting with Crb2, is the temperature sensitive
mutation site. Because the mutants were also defective in replication,
the amino terminus might also interact with an unidentified protein(s)
essential for replication. The central-to-carboxy-terminal region is
probably the site for interaction with Chk1 and Crb3. The
amino-terminal and the central-to-carboxy-terminal regions contain
multiple BRCT motifs (Saka et al. 1994
; Bork et al. 1997
). As both Cut5
and Crb2 contain BRCT motif, pursuing their protein functions will shed
light on the actual role of BRCT motif in maintaining the genome.
It is not a simple matter to explain the reason cut5 mutants
are sensitive to UV because the UV- and 4NQO-induced checkpoint is
maintained in cut5 mutant at both 26°C and 36°C (Saka et
al. 1994a
,b
; Saka et al., unpubl.). We speculate that the interaction between Cut5 and Crb2 is needed for promoting efficient repair of the
damaged DNA. In cut5/rad4 mutants, where the
interaction of Cut5 with Crb2 might be lost even at 26°C, repair
replication may become inefficient, leading to UV hypersensitivity.
However, Crb2, which is responsible for generating a damage signal for cell-cycle arrest is present. The reason for the HU sensitivity in
crb2 is also unclear because the HU-induced
checkpoint is retained in
crb2. We propose that
only Cut5 is required for HU-induced checkpoint and that the Cut5-Crb2
interaction is needed for an unidentified function to facilitate
replication under an inhibited nucleotide supply. Under the HU-induced
checkpoint arrest, Cut5 may send an arrest signal through a protein
other than Crb2 or directly to Chk1. Two-hybrid interaction favors the
latter case. To explain the result that both Crb2 and Cut5 are
necessary for the cell-cycle arrest by defects in DNA polymerases or
ligase, we propose that neither Crb2 nor Cut5 alone can detect the
replication defect caused by defects of polymerases or ligase.
It remains to be determined whether the stable complex between Crb2 and Cut5 is actually present in the nucleus in vivo but difficult to detect in S. pombe extracts, or if the stable complex never exists in vivo and the interaction is only transient such as is true of a substrate-enzyme relationship. In sucrose gradient centrifugation, fractions of Crb2 and Cut5 were sedimented as large heterogeneous materials that might contain both Crb2 and Cut5. A small fraction of Chk1 was also in the large complex form. The properties of these large complexes are unknown, and whether Cut5, Crb2, and Chk1 exist in the same large structure remains to be determined. Alternatively, slowly sedimenting forms of Crb2, Cut5, and Chk1 were obtained after UV irradiation, and these smaller forms possibly phosphorylated may interact each other in a transient style.
| |
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Strains and media
Haploid wild-type S. pombe h
972 and h+
975 (Gutz et al. 1974
) and their derivative mutant strains were used.
cut5 mutants (cut5-T401, cut5
580, rad4-116; Duck
et al. 1976
; Saka and Yanagida 1993
; Samejima et al. 1993
),
rad mutants (rad1-1, rad3::ura4+,
rad9::ura4+, rad17::ura4+,
rad26::ura4+, and rad27::ura4+ mutants;
Al-Khodairy et al. 1994
; gifts of Dr. A.M. Carr), cdc mutants
(cdc6-121, cdc17-K42, cdc20-M10, cdc22-C1, Nurse et al. 1976
;
Gordon and Fantes 1986
) and swi7-H4 (Singh and Klar 1993
) mutants were described previously. Rich YPD (2% glucose, 2%
polypeptone, and 1% yeast extract) and minimal EMM2 (Mitchison 1970
)
were employed.
Determination of UV sensitivity
The procedures for examining UV sensitivity were described
previously (Saka and Yanagida 1993
; Saka et al. 1994
). Briefly, S. pombe cells diluted were plated and incubated for 30 min, followed by UV irradiation (0-300 J/m2; Stratalinker,
Stratagene) and culturing for several days at 26°C (the permissive
temperature for temperature sensitive mutants). The percent septation
index was obtained by Calicoflour staining after glutaraldehyde
fixation. To study the checkpoint response, exponentially growing
S. pombe cells were irradiated by 100 J/m2.
FACScan analysis, Southern transfer, and sequencing
The procedures for FACScan were described previously (Costello et
al. 1986
; Saka and Yanagida 1993
). Southern hybridization was performed
by the procedures described (Saka et al. 1994a
). The dye-terminator
method was employed for nucleotide sequencing by use of the ABI 373A
Sequencing System.
Cell extracts and immunoblotting
Cells were collected and suspended in ice chilled phosphate
buffer-saline at pH 7.5 containing 10 mM NaN3 and
50 mM NaF, rapidly frozen by liquid nitrogen and kept at
20°C. Cells were then thawed and suspended at a concentration of
1 × 109/ml in HB buffer (25 mM
Tris-HCl at pH 7.5 containing 15 mM MgCl2, 15 mM EGTA, 0.1% NP-40, 1 mM DTT, 60 mM
-glycerophosphate, 15 mM
p-nitrophenylphosphate, 0.5 mM
Na3V04, 0.1 mM NaF, 1 mM PMSF). Cells were disrupted by glass beads and centrifuged at 4°C at 14,000 rpm for 20 min. Supernatants were used for immunoblotting. As secondary
antibodies, HRP-labeled protein A (200-fold dilution, Bio-Rad) or
HRP-labeled sheep anti-mouse antibody (Amersham, 500-fold dilution) was
employed.
Two-hybrid screening
The S. pombe cDNA library adapted to the two-hybrid
system in yeast was purchased from Clontech, Inc. (XL4000AA), and the instruction procedures for screening were followed by use of the HF7c
strain. Yeast cells were grown in the SD synthetic medium supplemented
with the dropout solution at 30°C. DNAs of different domains of the
cut5+ gene were obtained by amplification by the PCR method
(the R1R2 region) or by isolating the restriction fragments (the
central acidic domain, R3, R4, and the carboxy-terminal region). These DNAs were ligated in frame with pGBT9 containing the GAL4 DNA-binding domain. All of these plasmids were verified by nucleotide sequencing. The filter assay for
-galactosidase activity was done in
accordance with the company's instructions. Strong signals were
obtained from colonies by incubating them on the filter for 30 min or
up to 2 hr. Liquid assay for the
-galactosidase activity was also done following the company's instructions by use of the SFY526 strain.
Preparation of GST fusion proteins and in vitro binding assay
NdeI-BamHI fragment of cut5+
containing the R1R2 region was blunt-end ligated at the XhoI
site of plasmid pGEX-KG (Guan and Dixon 1991
), whereas
BamHI-SalI fragment containing the R3 region was
inserted at the same site of pGEX-KG. Resulting plasmids pYS583 and
pR308, respectively, were used for producing fusion proteins that were
dissolved in the presence of 8 M urea, followed by successive dialysis in PBS containing reduced concentrations of urea and 10 mM DTT. Resulting GST proteins in the absence of urea were incubated with glutathione beads. In vitro translation of Crb2 and Crb3
proteins was performed with the Promega TNT Coupled reticulocyte lysate
system and [35S]methionine (ICN). Luciferase, Crb2, and
Crb3 proteins were in vitro translated and mixed with the beads bound
to GST-R1R2 or GST-R3, and incubated at 4°C for 1 hr. Beads were
washed three times by 10 volumes of 20 mM Tris-HCl at pH 7.5 containing 1 mM EDTA, 10% glycerol, 1 mM DTT, 0.1 mM PMSF, 1 µg/ml of leupeptin, 0.5 µg/ml of aprotinin, followed by SDS-PAGE and
autoradiography by use of the Amersham Amplify system.
Sucrose gradient centrifugation and phosphatase treatment
The procedure of sucrose gradient centrifugation was followed to
that reported previously (Yamashita et al. 1996
; Yamada et al. 1997
).
Extracts prepared from each 4 × 108 cells nonirradiated
or irradiated with UV (100 J/m2) and cultured 1 hr at 26°C were run at 40,000 rpm for 12 hr at 4°C with a SW50.1
rotor. BSA (4.5S) and thyroglobulin (16.5-19S) were used as the
markers for the S values. The procedure of Walworth and Bernards (1996)
was followed for treatment of Crb2 and Chk1 in cell extracts by
protein phosphatase (New England Biolab).
GFP tagging and immunofluorescence microscopy
The jellyfish GFP gene was introduced to the amino-terminal site
of the crb2+ gene by creating a new BamHI site at
the amino-terminus. A mild inducible promoter REP41 (Maundrell 1990
)
was placed upstream of the fused GFP-Crb2 gene by use of pGFT41 (Heim
et al. 1995
). Resulting plasmid was introduced into
crb2 strain and fluorescence was observed in
the presence (repressed) or the absence (induced) of thiamine
(Nabeshima et al. 1995
). Cells cultured in the presence or the absence
of thiamine carrying pGFT-Crb2 were observed by blue light without
fixation.
Gene disruption
The procedure of gene disruption was as reported previously
(Rothstein 1983
).
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
Y.S and F.E. contributed equally to the present work. We are greatly indebted to Drs. N. Walworth, A. Carr, and S. Francesconi for strains, plasmids, and helpful comments. This work was supported by grants of the Specially Promoted Research from the Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture of Japan and the Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology research fund of the Japan Science and Technology Corporation.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 USC section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Received August 20, 1997; revised version accepted October 14, 1997.
1 These authors contributed equally to this work.
2 Present address: National Institute for Medical Research, The Ridgeway, London, NW7 1AA, UK.
3 Corresponding author.
E-MAIL yanagida{at}kozo.biophys.kyoto-u.ac.jp; FAX 81 75 753 4208.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|