|
|
|
Vol. 14, No. 17, pp. 2140-2145, September 1, 2000
Max Planck Institut für biophysikalische Chemie, Abteilung Molekulare Entwicklungsbiologie, Am Fassberg, D-37077 Göttingen, Germany
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The Drosophila tracheal system, a tubular network, is formed from isolated ectodermal metameres by guided branch outgrowth and branch fusion. Branch outgrowth is triggered by the localized and transient activity of Branchless (Bnl/dFGF). Here, we report the discovery of a mesodermal cell that links the leading cells of outgrowing main branches 2.5 hr before they fuse. This bridge-cell serves as an essential guidance post and needs Hunchback (Hb) activity to exert its function. The bridge-cell provides cues acting in concert with Bnl/dFGF signaling to mediate directed branch outgrowth that ultimately leads to position-specific branch fusion.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Formation of three-dimensional tubular structures,
such as the insect tracheal system (Manning and
Krasnow 1993
; Samakovlis et al. 1996
), the vertebrate vascular system
(Risau 1997
), and the lung (Hogan et al. 1997
), involves the guided
outgrowth of epithelial cells. In Drosophila, the tracheal
system is generated from 10 isolated lateral cell clusters on each side
of the embryo (Fig. 1A). These cell clusters, which
are each composed of about 80 ectodermal cells, invaginate in a
strictly coordinated manner into the underlying mesoderm, where they
establish a pattern of six primary tubular branches (Fig. 1B). Some of
these branches grow along the dorsoventral body axis to form the
dorsal, the lateral, and the ganglionic branches. Additional primary
branches extend along the anteroposterior axis to generate the visceral and dorsal trunk anterior and posterior branches. The individual tracheal cell clusters connect by fusion of the dorsal trunk and the
lateral trunk branches (Fig. 1C). The two halves of the network interconnect by anastomosis formation, and the three-dimensional system
starts with the transport of gases during larval development (for
details, see Manning and Krasnow 1993
; Samakovlis et al. 1996
).
|
Tubular branch outgrowth is guided by the local and complex expression
pattern of a Drosophila FGF homolog, Branchless (Bnl/dFGF), emanating from cell clusters surrounding each tracheal metamere (Sutherland et al. 1996
; Metzger and Krasnow 1999
). However, although mutant analysis shows that Bnl/dFGF is necessary for primary branch outgrowth, the restricted Bnl/dFGF expression seems not to be essential
for the directed outgrowth of all primary branches. This conclusion is
based on the observation that the constitutive activation of Bnl/dFGF
signaling in bnl mutant embryos partially restores outgrowth
of the main tracheal tube, the dorsal trunk, whereas the other primary
branches are not generated. Thus, it was proposed that additional
guidance cues might be necessary for the outgrowth of dorsal trunk
branches (Sutherland et al. 1996
).
| |
Results and Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We noted a single cell that is marked by expression of the gene
hunchback (hb; Lehmann 1985
; Tautz et al. 1987
;
Hülskamp 1991
) at the posterior lateral margin of each tracheal
metamere (Fig. 1D,I). This cell gives rise to daughter cells that
maintain hb expression (Fig. 1E,J,K). The more ventrally
located daughter cell maintains a round morphology and remains in
position, whereas the dorsal daughter cell connects to the posterior
bud of the tracheal metamere, termed the dorsal trunk posterior branch
(Fig. 1E). Subsequently, the dorsal daughter cell elongates and extends posteriorly and thereby contacts to the anterior bud, termed the dorsal
trunk anterior branch, of the adjacent posterior tracheal metamere
(Fig. 1E,F). In this way, the dorsal daughter cell bridges the leading
cells of the dorsal trunk anterior and posterior branches of two
adjacent metameres (Fig. 1F), which then fuse about 2.5 hr later to
form the continuous dorsal trunk. Thus, we refer to the dorsal daughter
cell as the bridge-cell. The cell remains at this position until fusion
between the dorsal trunk anterior and posterior branches occurs (Fig.
1G). During this fusion process, the bridge-cell becomes displaced and
hb expression starts to fade (Fig. 1H).
To trace the origin of the bridge-cell, we performed
double-staining experiments with tracheal-specific
markers and hb.
-Galactosidase expression in
nuclei of dorsal trunk fusion cells and in nuclei of tracheal cells
revealed a lack of colocalization with bridge-cell hb
expression (Fig. 1L-1O). Furthermore, trachealess
(trh; Isaac and Andrew 1996
; Wilk et al. 1996
) mutant embryos,
which lack tracheal cell identity, show hb-expressing
bridge-cells as found in wild-type embryos (Fig. 1P,Q). Thus, these
results indicate that the bridge-cell is of nontracheal origin.
Finally, double-staining of hb and a mesodermal marker (Greig
and Akam 1993
) revealed coexpression of hb and the marker in
bridge-cell precursors (Fig. 1R,S). Therefore, the bridge-cell is a
nontracheal cell and of mesodermal origin.
To understand the function of bridge-cells in dorsal trunk formation,
we first asked whether bridge-cell development is affected in
hb mutant embryos. Homozygous hbFB mutant
embryos, which express a nonfunctional Hb protein because of a
premature stop codon mutation (Hülskamp 1991
), express the hb transcript only transiently in bridge-cell precursors (not shown), raising the possibility that these cells may die. In fact, TUNEL staining suggests cell death is occurring at positions that correspond to those of bridge-cell precursors in
hbFB mutants but not in wild-type embryos (Fig.
2A-D). This finding implies that the lack of
hb activity causes bridge-cell precursors to undergo
apoptosis. To show apoptosis as the underlying event of transient
hb expression in bridge-cells more directly, we ubiquitously expressed in hbFB mutant embryos the baculovirus P35
protein, a suppresser of apoptosis in Drosophila (Hay et
al. 1994
). In contrast with hbFB mutants, which lack
hb expression in the bridge-cells at stage 12 (Fig. 2E),
hbFB embryos expressing P35 protein maintain
hb expression in bridge-cells (Fig. 2F) as is found in
wild-type embryos (Fig. 2G). Thus, expression of hb serves as
a marker for bridge-cells, whereas its product, a transcription factor
(Tautz et al. 1987
; Hoch et al. 1991
), is essential for bridge-cells
viability. Therefore, analysis of tracheal development in
hbFB mutant embryos would allow us to study
bridge-cell function in dorsal trunk formation directly.
|
In hbFB mutant embryos initial tracheal development,
including primary branch outgrowth, appears normal up to the end of
stage 12 (Fig. 3A-D). Subsequently, the dorsal trunk
branches become stalled and misrouted, whereas the other primary
branches are formed as in wild-type embryos (Fig. 3E-H). Despite the
strong dorsal trunk phenotype, the dorsal trunk branches occasionally fuse in hbFB mutant embryos and form dorsal trunk
rudiments (Fig. 3F,H). This observation and normal expression of the
escargot (esg) fusion cell marker (Whiteley et al.
1992
) in hbFB mutant embryos (Fig. 3I) suggest that
the fusion process, required for dorsal trunk formation, is not
impaired in hbFB mutant embryos. These results
indicate that hb is not necessary for the initial outgrowth
but for the subsequent outgrowth of dorsal trunk branches. Thus, the
results also suggest that the hb-dependent bridge-cells are involved
in the outgrowth of dorsal trunk branches toward their fusion partners.
|
Recent studies have shown that Bnl/dFGF is necessary for the primary
tracheal branching, including the formation of the dorsal trunk
(Sutherland et al. 1996
; Metzger and Krasnow 1999
). Therefore, we asked
whether the absence of bridge-cells might interfere with bnl
expression. We found that the expression pattern of bnl was unaffected in hb mutant embryos (Fig. 3J,K). Also, hb
expression in the bridge-cells was not affected in bnl mutant
embryos and in embryos that lack the activity of breathless
(btl), which codes for the Bnl/dFGF receptor (Fig. 3L; data
not shown). Thus, bridge-cells do not interfere with the proper expression of
Bnl/dFGF around the developing tracheal branches, and hb-expression
in the bridge-cells is independent of Bnl/dFGF signaling.
Because localized Bnl/dFGF signaling is not necessary for dorsal trunk
formation (Reichman-Fried et al. 1994
; Lee et al. 1996
; Sutherland et
al. 1996
), we asked whether the bridge-cell mediates the proposed
additional guidance mechanism for dorsal trunk branch outgrowth
(Sutherland et al. 1996
). By use of the Gal4/UAS-system (Brand and
Perrimon 1993
), we expressed Bnl/dFGF ectopically in tracheal cells to
impede the spatial cues that are normally derived from the local
arrangement of cell clusters expressing Bnl/dFGF. In contrast with
wild-type embryos (Fig. 4A), embryos with ectopic expression of Bnl/dFGF develop complete dorsal trunk structures but
lack the other primary branches (Fig. 4B). However,
hbFB mutant embryos that express Bnl/dFGF
ectopically had no signs of dorsal trunk branch outgrowth at all (Fig.
4C). These results indicate that the bridge-cell is necessary and
essential for dorsal trunk formation, suggesting that this cell
provides guidance cues specifically during the anterior-posterior
dorsal trunk branch outgrowth. Thus, the bridge-cell, in combination
with Bnl/dFGF signaling, directs outgrowth of the main tracheal tube
and may mediate the proposed additional guidance mechanism.
|
To test the above inference, we expressed hb ectopically via
the Gal4/UAS-system (Brand and Perrimon 1993
) in sensory organ precursor (SOP) cells in positions close to the bridge-cells. The
outgrowing dorsal trunk anterior branches were seen in contact with the
cells that ectopically express hb, even in the presence of the
normal bridge-cells (Fig. 4D). As a consequence of the ectopic
hb expression, the dorsal trunk of the embryos show
interruptions and abnormal bottleneck-like fusion points (Fig. 4E).
Thus, hb expression in ectopic cells close to bridge-cells
triggers a differentiation program that interferes with the directed
outgrowth of the dorsal trunk branches suggesting that hb
activity is required not only for the viability but also for the
identity of the bridge-cell. Whether the differentiation program
involves local and short-range signals and/or provides a migration
matrix by cell adhesion is unknown. However, we prefer the hypothesis
that the bridge-cell serves as an adhesion-dependent guiding post, as
we observed tracheal cell extensions along the bridge-cell directly
after the initial contact (Fig. 4F,G).
Our discovery of the bridge-cell and previous studies on Bnl/dFGF
signaling provide a coherent model of how dorsal trunk formation may
occur. After invagination of the tracheal placodes, budding of the
tracheal metameres is triggered by localized Bnl/dFGF activity (Sutherland et al. 1996
). This signal apparently does not always have
the necessary precision on its own to guide the leading cells. The
bridge-cell provides this precision by serving as a guidance post to
properly position the budding dorsal trunk branches. The results also
demonstrate an interplay of cells deriving from two different germ
layers, mesoderm and ectoderm, which is necessary to establish the
interconnected tubular tracheal network during embryogenesis. The
identification of a key player in bridge-cell differentiation, namely
the transcription factor Hb, provides an entry point to unravel the
molecular targets of hb. Their analysis may also contribute to
gaining further insights into the function of the bridge-cells during tubular
network formation, possibly in organisms other than Drosophila.
| |
Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Materials
We used the following antibodies: monoclonal antibody 2A12 to
stain tracheal lumen (DSHB, Iowa); anti-
-galactosidase antibody (Promega); anti-Hunchback antibody (gift from A. La Rosée, MPI, Göttingen); anti-Crumbs antibody (Tepass and Knust 1993
); Alexa 488 or Alexa 546 goat antirabbit IgG or goat antimouse IgG (Molecular Probes); alkaline phosphatase-conjugated or biotinylated antirabbit IgG
or antimouse IgG; biotinylated antimouse IgM (Vector Laboratories); anti-digoxigenin- and anti-fluorescein-AP, Fab fragments (Roche).
We used a number of alleles and fly strains: UAS-hb flies
(Wimmer et al. 2000
); hbFB, hb9Q,
dfrE82, trh5D55, and
btlH82
3 were obtained from the Tübingen
Stock Center. btl-Gal4 drives Gal4 expression ubiquitously in
the tracheal system from stage 10 onward (Shiga et al. 1996
).
UAS-GFPNlacZ was used to detect nuclear
-galactosidase
expression (Shiga et al. 1996
). The lacZ enhancer trap line
1-eve-1 reveals P-element integration in the trh gene and was
used to mark tracheal cells by cytoplasmic
-galactosidase (Perrimon et al. 1991
). PO163 drives Gal4 in a subset of peripheral nervous system precursor cells (Janning 1997
). UAS-P35 was
provided by H. Steller (MIT, Cambridge). The P-element of the
lacZ enhancer trap line G6 is integrated in the esg
gene and marks dorsal trunk homotip cell nuclei (Whiteley et al. 1992
).
We also used actin-Gal4 and twi-Gal4 flies (Greig
and Akam 1993
).
TUNEL assay
TUNEL analysis of embryos was done by RNA in situ hybridization with the following modifications: After the second fixation step, the embryos were washed with TUNEL reaction mixture (In Situ Cell Death Detection Kit, AP; Roche) and incubated with 100 µl of TUNEL reaction mixture for 120 min at 37°C; the embryos were washed with PBT and incubated with anti-fluorescein antibody (Roche) for 12 hr at 4°C.
Immunostainings and in situ hybridizations
RNA in situ hybridizations and immunostainings to whole-mount
embryos were performed as described (Goldstein and Fryberg 1994
). The
RNA probes used in our experiments were derived from bnl
(Sutherland et al. 1996
), stg (Edgar and O'Farrell 1990
),
lacZ, and sal (Kühnlein et al. 1994
).
Immunostained embryos were viewed with a Zeiss Axiophot microscope.
Embryos stained with fluorescent antibodies were analyzed by laser
scanning microscopy as described (Kühnlein and Schuh 1996
).
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We are grateful to M. González-Gaitán for initiation of the project. Special thanks go to H. Jäckle for providing a stimulating environment and critical reading of the manuscript. We thank M.A. Krasnow, A. La Rosée, C. Samakovlis, H. Steller, and E. Wimmer for antibodies, cDNAs and fly stocks. We also thank M. Affolter, R.P. Kühnlein, C. Krause and E. Wimmer for critical comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by the Max-Planck-Society (MPIbpc Abt. 170) and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 271).
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 USC section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
[Key Words: hunchback; FGF; tracheal system; Drosophila; guidance]
Received May 16, 2000; revised version accepted July 5, 2000.
1 Corresponding author.
E-MAIL rschuh{at}gwdg.de; FAX 49-551-201-1755.
Article and publication are at www.genesdev.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gad.180900.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-galactosidase fusion protein as a marker for morphogenesis in living Drosophila.
Dev. Growth Differ.
38:
99-106.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Jiang and S. T. Crews The Drosophila dysfusion Basic Helix-Loop-Helix (bHLH)-PAS Gene Controls Tracheal Fusion and Levels of the Trachealess bHLH-PAS Protein Mol. Cell. Biol., August 15, 2003; 23(16): 5625 - 5637. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Hosono, K. Takaira, R. Matsuda, and K. Saigo Functional subdivision of trunk visceral mesoderm parasegments in Drosophila is required for gut and trachea development Development, February 1, 2003; 130(3): 439 - 449. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Dorfman, L. Glazer, U. Weihe, M. F. Wernet, and B.-Z. Shilo Elbow and Noc define a family of zinc finger proteins controlling morphogenesis of specific tracheal branches Development, August 1, 2002; 129(15): 3585 - 3596. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Dossenbach, S. Rock, and M. Affolter Specificity of FGF signaling in cell migration in Drosophila Development, November 15, 2001; 128(22): 4563 - 4572. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. H. Patel, D. C. Hayward, S. Lall, N. R. Pirkl, D. DiPietro, and E. E. Ball Grasshopper hunchback expression reveals conserved and novel aspects of axis formation and segmentation Development, September 15, 2001; 128(18): 3459 - 3472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||