|
|
|
Vol. 15, No. 14, pp. 1753-1758, July 15, 2001
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Plants maintain cytosine methylation at CG and non-CG residues to control gene expression and genome stability. In a screen for Arabidopsis mutants that alter methylation and silencing of a densely methylated endogenous reporter gene, we recovered 11 loss-of-function alleles in the CMT3 chromomethylase gene. The cmt3 mutants displayed enhanced expression and reduced methylation of the reporter, particularly at non-CG cytosines. CNG methylation was also reduced at repetitive centromeric sequences. Thus, CMT3 is a key determinant for non-CG methylation. The lack of CMT homologs in animal genomes could account for the observation that in contrast to plants, animals maintain primarily CG methylation.
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In many eukaryotes, including mammals, higher plants, and some
species of fungi, cytosine methylation plays an
important role in genome stability and development by altering
chromatin structure and patterns of gene expression. In mammalian
genomes, methylation is found primarily at cytosines in the symmetric
context 5'-CG-3' (CG), whereas in plant and fungal genomes methylation
is found on both CG and non-CG residues (Yoder et al. 1997
; Colot and
Rossignol 1999
; Finnegan and Kovac 2000
). Mammals and higher plants
carry related cytosine methyltransferases of the Dnmt1/MET1 class that have been implicated by mutational analysis as enzymes that maintain the bulk of genomic methylation (Li et al. 1992
; Finnegan et al. 1996
;
Ronemus et al. 1996
). Another class of chromomethylases (CMTs) has been
identified by analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana genomic
sequences (Henikoff and Comai 1998
; McCallum et al. 2000
). The CMT
class is characterized by the presence of a chromodomain amino acid
motif between the cytosine methyltransferase catalytic motifs I and IV.
There are three CMT genes encoded in Arabidopsis: CMT1, CMT2, and CMT3 (Henikoff and Comai
1998
; Finnegan and Kovac 2000
; McCallum et al. 2000
). In the
Wassilewskija (WS) strain background used for this study, CMT2
and CMT3 are predicted to encode functional proteins, whereas
the CMT1 coding sequence is disrupted by an Eve1
(Henikoff and Comai 1998
) retroelement insertion (J. Bender, unpubl.).
CMT genes have also been identified in several other plant
species including Brassica and maize, but not in fungal or
animal systems (Rose et al. 1998
; Finnegan and Kovac 2000
). Recently,
Arabidopsis CMT3 (Lindroth et al. 2001
) and the maize CMT
homolog ZMET2 (Papa et al. 2001
) have been implicated in the maintenance of CNG methylation.
In the genome of Arabidopsis, duplicated genes encoding the
tryptophan pathway enzyme phosphoribosylanthranilate isomerase (PAI)
provide a well-characterized example of endogenous genes that are
densely methylated with both CG and non-CG methylation (Luff et al.
1999
). In the Arabidopsis strain WS, there are four methylated
PAI genes at three unlinked loci: a singlet PAI2 gene that encodes functional enzyme, a singlet PAI3 gene that does not encode functional enzyme, and a tail-to-tail inverted repeat of the
PAI1 and PAI4 genes (PAI1-PAI4) in which the
PAI1 gene encodes functional enzyme and the PAI4 gene
does not (Bender and Fink 1995
; Melquist et al. 1999
). The functional
singlet PAI2 gene is silenced by methylation (Bender and Fink
1995
; Jeddeloh et al. 1998
; Melquist et al. 1999
). In contrast, the
functional PAI1 gene in the inverted repeat is expressed
despite dense methylation in the body of the gene, providing sufficient
PAI enzyme for a wild-type plant phenotype (Melquist et al. 1999
). It
is likely that the WS PAI1 gene eludes silencing by
methylation because of novel promoter sequences lying upstream of the
methylated region (Melquist et al. 1999
; J. Bender, unpubl.).
Here we describe the isolation and characterization of mutations in the
CMT3 chromomethylase gene from a genetic screen for reduced
PAI methylation. Southern blot analysis and bisulfite genomic
methylation sequencing indicate that cmt3 mutations confer a
partial loss of CG methylation and a strong loss of non-CG methylation (both CNG and asymmetric cytosines) from the PAI genes.
Southern blot analysis of repetitive methylated genomic sequences
indicates that cmt3 mutations also confer reduced CNG
methylation on these regions. In contrast to characterized
Arabidopsis mutations that confer globally decreased
methylation (Finnegan et al. 1996
; Kakutani et al. 1996
; Ronemus et al.
1996
), the cmt3 mutations do not lead to pleiotropic effects
upon inbreeding, suggesting that CMT3 function is specialized for only
a subset of methylated regions in the genome.
| |
Results and Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To identify factors that control methylation and silencing of the WS
PAI genes, we isolated a mutant variant of WS,
pai1C251Y, in which silencing of the methylated singlet
PAI2 gene can be visualized by the intensity of a blue
fluorescent plant phenotype under ultra-violet (UV) light (Bartee and
Bender 2001
). In the pai1C251Y strain, the only potential
sources of PAI enzyme activity are the PAI1 gene, which is
crippled by a missense mutation, and the PAI2 gene, which is
silenced. Because of this PAI deficiency, the strain accumulates
fluorescent tryptophan pathway intermediates, as well as displaying
yellow-green leaf pigmentation, reduced size, increased bushiness, and
reduced fertility. However, second-site mutations that relieve
PAI2 silencing will suppress the PAI-deficient phenotypes
(Bartee and Bender 2001
). Thus, we mutagenized the pai1C251Y
strain and screened for seedlings with suppressed weak fluorescent
phenotypes. As a secondary screen, we tested PAI methylation by Southern blot analysis with methylation-sensitive restriction enzymes. Specifically, we assayed methylation with the isoschizomers HpaII and MspI, which recognize the sequence
5'-CCGG-3'. HpaII is sensitive to methylation of both the
inner (CG) and the outer (CNG) cytosines, whereas MspI is only
sensitive to methylation of the outer cytosines. These enzymes cleave
once in each WS PAI locus and reveal both the density and the
pattern of methylation for each gene (Bender and Fink 1995
; Luff et al.
1999
; Melquist et al. 1999
).
From this screening strategy we isolated 11 loss-of-function alleles in
the CMT3 gene (see below and Materials and Methods). The
cmt3 mutants in the pai1C251Y background displayed
strongly reduced fluorescence in early seedling development and
partially reduced fluorescence in adult plants, with increased size,
decreased bushiness, and increased fertility (Fig.
1). These intermediate fluorescent
cmt3 isolates did not revert to nonfluorescence, which is
diagnostic of loss of residual PAI2 methylation (Bender and Fink 1995
), at a detectable frequency. They displayed partially increased cleavage with HpaII and strongly increased cleavage with MspI for the PAI genes relative to parental
pai1C251Y (Fig. 2A). The cleavage
pattern suggested that the cmt3 mutants were most affected in
maintenance of CNG methylation of the PAI genes. To determine
whether the cmt3 mutants also affected methylation of a highly
repeated genomic sequence, we reprobed the HpaII/MspI Southern blot with a probe to the 180-bp centromere-associated repeat
(CEN) sequences (Vongs et al. 1993
). This probe revealed little effect on HpaII cleavage but increased MspI
cleavage, consistent with the pattern observed for the PAI
genes (Fig. 2B). A similar pattern of increased MspI cleavage
was also observed at the repeated rDNA (data not shown). All
of 11 cmt3 alleles tested had identical methylation patterns
in these assays. Moreover, when the cmt3 alleles were
segregated away from the pai1C251Y allele into a wild-type WS
background, they also displayed identical methylation patterns in these
assays (Fig. 2). The PAI and CEN methylation patterns
were distinct from the patterns induced by the characterized ddm1 and met1 methylation-deficient mutations (Fig.
2; Bartee and Bender 2001
).
|
|
To more precisely determine methylation patterns in the cmt3
mutant background, we performed genomic sequencing of methylation patterns in the PAI1 and PAI2 promoter regions of a
representative cmt3 allele by using sodium bisulfite
mutagenesis (Frommer et al. 1992
). This analysis revealed that the majority of
methylated cytosines (87% in PAI1 and 70% in PAI2)
occurred at CG residues (Fig. 3; Table 1).
Compared with the wild-type WS PAI1 promoter (Luff et al.
1999
; Table 1), CG methylation was reduced 34%, CNG methylation was
eliminated, and asymmetric methylation was reduced 93%; in the
PAI2 promoter, CG methylation was reduced 8%, CNG methylation
was reduced 92%, and non-CG methylation was reduced 75%. Thus, loss
of CMT3 function has a strong effect on maintenance of CNG and
asymmetric methylation and a weaker effect on maintenance of CG
methylation. These results are consistent with reports that
Arabidopsis CMT3 and maize ZMET2 are important for maintenance
of CNG methylation at various genomic sites (Lindroth et al. 2001
; Papa
et al. 2001
), but they further show that CMT3 is also important for
maintenance of asymmetric methylation for the PAI genes. This
result implies either that CMT3 directly controls both symmetric and
asymmetric methylation or that the reduction in symmetric methylation
in the cmt3 mutant background causes reduced asymmetric
methylation as a secondary consequence. Because the methylated
sequences in the promoter and first exon of the PAI2 reporter
gene (~370 bp) contain only 16 dispersed CG motifs, loss of non-CG
methylation significantly hypomethylates this region of the gene (Fig.
3), accounting for enhanced PAI2 expression in the suppressor mutant.
|
|
The cmt3 mutant locus in the pai1C251Y cmt3
suppressor isolates was mapped by crosses with the polymorphic strain
Nd-0, which has a similar arrangement of densely methylated
PAI genes as found in WS (Melquist et al. 1999
). F2
progeny with weakly fluorescent phenotypes diagnostic of homozygosity
for both pai1C251Y and cmt3 were identified by visual
inspection under UV light and confirmed by MspI Southern blot
for strong PAI cleavage similar to that observed in the
parental suppressor isolates. A mapping population of F2
plants that fulfilled these criteria was then used to score for genomic
loci linked to the suppressed phenotype. The mapping analysis revealed
linkage to a single locus on the lower arm of chromosome 1. Because the
CMT3 putative cytosine methyltransferase gene maps to this
locus, we focused on this gene as a candidate. Within each mapping
population, we found complete linkage to a polymorphic marker that lies
within 100 kb of the CMT3 gene. To confirm that the
CMT3 gene was in fact the site of the methylation suppressor
mutations, we cloned and sequenced the gene from the 11 mutant
isolates. Sequencing revealed a single base change in the CMT3
coding sequence in each isolate. Three of the mutant alleles affected
absolutely conserved amino acids in the methyltransferase catalytic
domain, including the representative cmt3G456D allele used for
bisulfite sequencing. Another allele was predicted to prematurely
terminate the protein. Two alleles created splice junction mutations.
The remaining five alleles affected amino acids between
methyltransferase motif IV and the C terminus of the protein that are
highly conserved among the CMT genes (Fig. 4).
|
To further confirm that the CMT3 gene was the mutant locus, we transformed the pai1C251Y cmt3 isolates with a wild-type WS genomic clone of the CMT3 gene. Transformant seedlings were strongly fluorescent, similarly to those of the pai1C251Y strain (Fig. 1). Transformant lines assayed by Southern blot analysis in the T2 generation showed remethylation of the PAI2 gene to the levels observed in the original pai1C251Y strain (data not shown). Thus, the cloned CMT3 gene could complement the mutant methylation defects. As a control, the representative pai1C251Y cmt3G456D mutant was also transformed with a wild-type WS genomic clone of the CMT2 gene. CMT2 transformant seedlings were weakly fluorescent, similarly to those of the untransformed parental strain (Fig. 1), and did not display detectable remethylation of PAI2. This analysis shows that CMT2 cannot substitute for CMT3 function. In this regard, it is interesting to note that CMT2 differs from CMT3 primarily in its N-terminal sequence (Fig. 4).
Previously characterized methylation-deficient Arabidopsis
strains with defects in either the SWI2/SNF2 chromatin
remodeling factor-related gene DDM1 (Jeddeloh et al. 1999
) or
the Dnmt1-related MET1 cytosine methyltransferase gene display
progressive developmental abnormalities (Finnegan et al. 1996
; Kakutani
et al. 1996
; Ronemus et al. 1996
). Our preliminary analysis of
six-generation-inbred pai1C251Y cmt3 and two-generation-inbred
cmt3 strains revealed no obvious segregation of morphological
changes. This difference between cmt3 and other
methylation-deficient mutants is likely to reflect the fact that CG
methylation is retained to a higher degree in cmt3 than in
ddm1 or met1 (Fig. 2; Bartee and Bender 2001
).
Because many of the endogenous methylated sites in the Arabidopsis genome, such as the CEN repeats (Fig. 2;
Vongs et al. 1993
; Lindroth et al. 2001
), and the promoter of the
FWA homeo-domain gene (Soppe et al. 2000
; Lindroth et al.
2001
), carry primarily CG methylation, cmt3 mutations would
not be expected to strongly affect these loci. Instead, CMT3
most likely acts as a reinforcing methylase that adds an extra layer of
methylation to particular genomic regions such as the PAI
genes, in which the increased methylation density leads to increased
silencing. A specific model is that the basal layer of CG methylation
provided by other functions such as MET1 could serve as a guide for
CMT3, which would then decorate the basal layer with extra CG and
non-CG methylation. CMT3 recruitment to targeted regions could involve
chromatin protein interactions with the chromodomain motif (Henikoff
and Comai 1998
), along with interactions mediated by the unique
N-terminal sequences.
Because fungi such as Neurospora crassa and Ascobolus
immersus can maintain non-CG methylation (Selker et al. 1993
; Goyon et al. 1994
), these organisms might encode CMT genes.
Conversely, because animals such as humans and mice lack non-CG
methylation, these organisms are predicted to lack CMT genes,
as is the case from analyses of current sequence databases. The
apparent lack of CMT-like methylases in animal genomes (Finnegan and
Kovac 2000
) suggests that animals have evolved alternate mechanisms for
reinforcing chromatin states.
| |
Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Mutant isolation and sequencing
Seeds of WS pai1C251Y were mutagenized with ethylmethane
sulfonate (Niyogi et al. 1993
) and grown up as 20 pools of ~500 M1 plants each; M2 progeny seeds were collected from each pool.
Approximately 1000 seedlings from each M2 pool were grown on agar
medium for 2 wk and then screened with a hand-held short wavelength UV
light source for individuals with reduced fluorescence. Putative
mutants were transplanted to soil, and genomic DNA prepared from a
single leaf was used for Southern blot analysis of methylation
patterns. From the screen of 20,000 M2 seedlings, all 11 isolates that
displayed cmt3 methylation patterns (Fig. 2) proved to be
cmt3 alleles by mapping, sequencing, and complementation
analysis. Ten other isolates with distinct methylation patterns as
determined by HpaII/MspI Southern blot analysis were
also recovered, but these isolates remain to be characterized.
Interestingly, none of the other isolates displayed the PAI
and CEN Southern blot phenotypes diagnostic of ddm1
mutations in the WS background (Fig. 2). Because we expect to recover
ddm1 alleles from the screen (Bartee and Bender 2001
), this
observation suggests that the screen is not yet saturated.
The cmt3 mutant locus was mapped to the lower arm of
chromosome 1 with standard CAPS (Konieczny and Ausubel 1993
) and simple sequence length polymorphism (SSLP) (Bell and Ecker 1994
) markers that
are polymorphic between WS and Nd-0. It was further localized between
the markers NF5I14 and NF22K20 (http://www.arabidopsis.org/servlets/mapper). Linkage to CMT3 was determined with the T17F3 marker, which lies within 100 kb of the CMT3 gene: forward primer 5'-gacataataccgagtacccac-3'; reverse
primer 5'-ccaccaccttgcactgccgacc-3'; in WS a 354-bp product cleaves
once with MspI into 240 bp and 114 bp fragments, whereas the
Nd-0 product is uncleaved.
Mutant alleles of CMT3 were amplified by PCR from genomic DNA. Products from two independent PCRs were cloned and sequenced for each allele. Alleles that changed restriction sites (both splice site mutations, cmt3G456D, cmt3G465D, and cmt3R703K) were confirmed by PCR amplification of the mutant region followed by cleavage with the appropriate enzyme.
CMT genomic and cDNA clones
The CMT3 transgene is a WS genomic fragment extending
from 2.9 kb upstream of the start codon to 0.8 kb downstream of the stop codon subcloned into the pBIN19 transformation vector (Bevan 1984
). The CMT2 transgene is a WS genomic fragment extending
from 1.7 kb upstream of the start codon to 0.9 kb downstream of the stop codon subcloned into pBIN19. Both clones were isolated by hybridization from a WS genomic library (Bender and Fink 1995
). Both
clones were sequenced across the coding region to confirm their
structure and determine WS polymorphisms. Transgenes were introduced
into the WS pai1C251Y cmt3G456D strain by an in planta transformation method (Clough and Bent 1998
).
The CMT3 predicted amino acid sequence was determined by cloning and sequencing a cDNA isolate generated by RT-PCR from WS whole-plant RNA. CMT2 and ZMET2 amino acid sequences are predicted from the WS CMT2 genomic sequence, cDNA sequences available from the database, and alignment with related genes.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
This work was supported by grants from the Searle Scholars Foundation (97-E-103), March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation (FY00-418), and NIH (1R01GM61148) to J.B. L.B. was supported by NCI training grant 5-T32-CA09110.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 USC section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
[Key Words: Cytosine methyltransferase; gene silencing; Arabidopsis thaliana]
Received April 23, 2001; revised version accepted May 22, 2001.
1 Corresponding author.
E-MAIL jbender{at}welchlink.welch.jhu.edu; FAX (410) 955-2926.
Article and publication are at http://www.genesdev.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gad.905701.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
subunit.
Plant Cell
5:
1011-1027This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. R. Henderson and S. E. Jacobsen Tandem repeats upstream of the Arabidopsis endogene SDC recruit non-CG DNA methylation and initiate siRNA spreading Genes & Dev., June 15, 2008; 22(12): 1597 - 1606. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Zhang The Epigenetic Landscape of Plants Science, April 25, 2008; 320(5875): 489 - 492. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Chen, M. Ha, E. Lackey, J. Wang, and Z. J. Chen RNAi of met1 Reduces DNA Methylation and Induces Genome-Specific Changes in Gene Expression and Centromeric Small RNA Accumulation in Arabidopsis Allopolyploids Genetics, April 1, 2008; 178(4): 1845 - 1858. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Saze, A. Shiraishi, A. Miura, and T. Kakutani Control of Genic DNA Methylation by a jmjC Domain-Containing Protein in Arabidopsis thaliana Science, January 25, 2008; 319(5862): 462 - 465. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Agorio and P. Vera ARGONAUTE4 Is Required for Resistance to Pseudomonas syringae in Arabidopsis PLANT CELL, November 1, 2007; 19(11): 3778 - 3790. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Makarevitch, R. M. Stupar, A. L. Iniguez, W. J. Haun, W. B. Barbazuk, S. M. Kaeppler, and N. M. Springer Natural Variation for Alleles Under Epigenetic Control by the Maize Chromomethylase Zmet2 Genetics, October 1, 2007; 177(2): 749 - 760. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. H. Rangwala and E. J. Richards Differential Epigenetic Regulation Within an Arabidopsis Retroposon Family Genetics, May 1, 2007; 176(1): 151 - 160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Mull, M. L. Ebbs, and J. Bender A Histone Methylation-Dependent DNA Methylation Pathway Is Uniquely Impaired by Deficiency in Arabidopsis S-Adenosylhomocysteine Hydrolase Genetics, November 1, 2006; 174(3): 1161 - 1171. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Xiao, R. C. Brown, B. E. Lemmon, J. J. Harada, R. B. Goldberg, and R. L. Fischer Regulation of Seed Size by Hypomethylation of Maternal and Paternal Genomes Plant Physiology, November 1, 2006; 142(3): 1160 - 1168. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. L. Keyte, R. Percifield, B. Liu, and J. F. Wendel Infraspecific DNA Methylation Polymorphism in Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) J. Hered., September 1, 2006; 97(5): 444 - 450. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. R. Hoen, K. C. Park, N. Elrouby, Z. Yu, N. Mohabir, R. K. Cowan, and T. E. Bureau Transposon-Mediated Expansion and Diversification of a Family of ULP-like Genes Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2006; 23(6): 1254 - 1268. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Ebbs and J. Bender Locus-Specific Control of DNA Methylation by the Arabidopsis SUVH5 Histone Methyltransferase PLANT CELL, May 1, 2006; 18(5): 1166 - 1176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Xiao, K. D. Custard, R. C. Brown, B. E. Lemmon, J. J. Harada, R. B. Goldberg, and R. L. Fischer DNA Methylation Is Critical for Arabidopsis Embryogenesis and Seed Viability PLANT CELL, April 1, 2006; 18(4): 805 - 814. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Xia, J. Wang, C. Liu, Y. Wang, Y. Wang, J. Zhai, J. Liu, X. Hong, X. Cao, J.-K. Zhu, et al. ROR1/RPA2A, a Putative Replication Protein A2, Functions in Epigenetic Gene Silencing and in Regulation of Meristem Development in Arabidopsis PLANT CELL, January 1, 2006; 18(1): 85 - 103. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Woodhouse, M. Freeling, and D. Lisch The mop1 (mediator of paramutation1) Mutant Progressively Reactivates One of the Two Genes Encoded by the MuDR Transposon in Maize Genetics, January 1, 2006; 172(1): 579 - 592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. N. Lukens, J. C. Pires, E. Leon, R. Vogelzang, L. Oslach, and T. Osborn Patterns of Sequence Loss and Cytosine Methylation within a Population of Newly Resynthesized Brassica napus Allopolyploids Plant Physiology, January 1, 2006; 140(1): 336 - 348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Ebbs, L. Bartee, and J. Bender H3 Lysine 9 Methylation Is Maintained on a Transcribed Inverted Repeat by Combined Action of SUVH6 and SUVH4 Methyltransferases Mol. Cell. Biol., December 1, 2005; 25(23): 10507 - 10515. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Zemach, Y. Li, B. Wayburn, H. Ben-Meir, V. Kiss, Y. Avivi, V. Kalchenko, S. E. Jacobsen, and G. Grafi DDM1 Binds Arabidopsis Methyl-CpG Binding Domain Proteins and Affects Their Subnuclear Localization PLANT CELL, May 1, 2005; 17(5): 1549 - 1558. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. S.C.F. Rocha, M. Sheikh, R. Melchiorre, M. Fagard, S. Boutet, R. Loach, B. Moffatt, C. Wagner, H. Vaucheret, and I. Furner The Arabidopsis HOMOLOGY-DEPENDENT GENE SILENCING1 Gene Codes for an S-Adenosyl-L-Homocysteine Hydrolase Required for DNA Methylation-Dependent Gene Silencing PLANT CELL, February 1, 2005; 17(2): 404 - 417. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Chang and C. S. Pikaard Transcript Profiling in Arabidopsis Reveals Complex Responses to Global Inhibition of DNA Methylation and Histone Deacetylation J. Biol. Chem., January 7, 2005; 280(1): 796 - 804. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Liu, Y. He, R. Amasino, and X. Chen siRNAs targeting an intronic transposon in the regulation of natural flowering behavior in Arabidopsis Genes & Dev., December 1, 2004; 18(23): 2873 - 2878. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Mathieu and J. Bender RNA-directed DNA methylation J. Cell Sci., October 1, 2004; 117(21): 4881 - 4888. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. MADLUNG and L. COMAI The Effect of Stress on Genome Regulation and Structure Ann. Bot., October 1, 2004; 94(4): 481 - 495. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Svoboda, P. Stein, W. Filipowicz, and R. M. Schultz Lack of homologous sequence-specific DNA methylation in response to stable dsRNA expression in mouse oocytes Nucleic Acids Res., July 9, 2004; 32(12): 3601 - 3606. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Gehring, Y. Choi, and R. L. Fischer Imprinting and Seed Development PLANT CELL, June 1, 2004; 16(suppl_1): S203 - S213. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Liu, J.-M. Kim, and F. Aoki Regulation of histone H3 lysine 9 methylation in oocytes and early pre-implantation embryos Development, May 15, 2004; 131(10): 2269 - 2280. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Kinoshita, A. Miura, Y. Choi, Y. Kinoshita, X. Cao, S. E. Jacobsen, R. L. Fischer, and T. Kakutani < |