|
|
|
Vol. 15, No. 15, pp. 1985-1997, August 1, 2001
1 Plant Biology Laboratory, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California 92037 USA; 2 Institute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712, USA; 3 Max-Delbrueck-Laboratorium in der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, D-50829 Koln, Germany; 4 School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Polar auxin transport is crucial for the regulation of auxin action
and required for some light-regulated responses during plant
development. We have found that two mutants of
Arabidopsis
doc1, which displays altered expression of
light-regulated genes, and tir3, known for its reduced auxin
transport
have similar defects and define mutations in a single gene
that we have renamed BIG. BIG is very similar to the
Drosophila gene Calossin/Pushover, a member of a gene
family also present in Caenorhabditis elegans and human
genomes. The protein encoded by BIG is extraordinary in size,
560 kD, and contains several putative Zn-finger domains. Expression-profiling experiments indicate that altered expression of
multiple light-regulated genes in doc1 mutants can be
suppressed by elevated levels of auxin caused by overexpression of an
auxin biosynthetic gene, suggesting that normal auxin distribution is required to maintain low-level expression of these genes in the dark.
Double mutants of tir3 with the auxin mutants pin1,
pid, and axr1 display severe defects in auxin-dependent
growth of the inflorescence. Chemical inhibitors of auxin transport
change the intracellular localization of the auxin efflux carrier PIN1
in doc1/tir3 mutants, supporting the idea that BIG is required
for normal auxin efflux.
[Key Words: Auxin transport; light signaling; Arabidopsis]
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Regulation of plant growth and development by genetic and
environmental signals relies on tightly controlled
spatial and temporal distribution of plant hormones. Changes in the
level of the auxin, indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), during light-regulated
growth responses have been described in several systems (Jones et al.
1991
; Behringer and Davies 1992
). However, until recently, evidence
directly linking light and auxin signal transduction pathways has been
lacking. Several gene families encoding primary-response
auxin-inducible transcripts have been characterized, including the
Aux/IAA genes, the SAUR genes, and the
GH3-like genes (Abel and Theologis 1996
). In
Arabidopsis, gain-of-function mutations in the
Aux/IAA genes SHY2/IAA3, AXR2/IAA7, and
AXR3/IAA17 promote characteristics of photomorphogenetic
development such as short hypocotyls and development of leaves in
etiolated seedlings (Tian and Reed 1999
; Nagpal et al. 2000
).
Interestingly, some Aux/IAA proteins may be direct targets of
phytochromes because they are phosphorylated by phytochrome A in vitro
(Colon-Carmona et al. 2000
). The phenotypes caused by mutations in the
auxin-responsive GH3-like genes, FIN219 and DFL1, also suggest a role for auxin in light-regulated
development. Mutations in FIN219 result in reduced far-red
light-mediated inhibition of hypocotyl elongation and induction of
light-regulated genes (Hsieh et al. 2000
), whereas mutations in the
DFL1 gene result in a short hypocotyl phenotype in light-grown
seedlings that increases in severity with increasing light fluence
(Nakazawa et al. 2001
). The NPH4/ARF7 locus encodes a member
of the ARF family of proteins, thought to function as transcriptional
activators of auxin-regulated genes. Mutations in this gene cause
impaired hypocotyl phototropism and other differential growth responses
associated with changes in auxin response (Stowe-Evans et al. 1998
;
Harper et al. 2000
).
In aerial parts of the adult plant, IAA is transported basipetally from
its site of synthesis at the shoot apex toward the roots in a process
referred to as polar auxin transport (Lomax et al. 1995
). In roots,
auxin moves in the opposite direction in different cell types,
acropetally through the root stele and basipetally through epidermal
cells (Tsurumi and Ohwaki 1978
; Meuwly and Pilet 1991
). Disruption of
auxin transport affects critical processes such as embryo development,
vascular differentiation, stem elongation, flower and root development,
apical dominance, and tropic responses (Lomax et al. 1995
).
Physiological studies have indicated that the polar auxin transport
system requires the activity of specific auxin influx and efflux
carriers located on the plasma membrane of transporting cells. These
carriers act to move auxin through files of cells by successively
transporting auxin into and out of adjacent cells in the file. Net
auxin movement is polar because the efflux carriers are asymmetrically
localized in transporting cells (Lomax et al. 1995
). Chemical
inhibitors referred to as phytotropins, such as N-1-naphthylphthalamic
acid (NPA), specifically inhibit the efflux component of polar auxin
transport (Katekar and Geissler 1977
; Hertel et al. 1983
), apparently
by binding to a plasma membrane-associated protein called the
NPA-binding protein (NBP; Muday et al. 1993
; Bernasconi et al. 1996
).
The identity of this protein is not known, but some experiments suggest
that it is distinct from the efflux carrier and may act to regulate
auxin transport (Morris et al. 1991
). A role of intracellular protein
trafficking in the regulation of auxin transport has been proposed,
because treatments of tobacco cultured cells with the inhibitor of
vesicular transport brefeldin A (BFA) are able to block the auxin
efflux system (Delbarre et al. 1998
).
Much of our current knowledge of the components of polar auxin
transport comes from genetic studies in Arabidopsis. The
pin1 mutants have reduced auxin transport and a phenotype
similar to plants treated with auxin transport inhibitors, including
alterations in vascular development and the formation of pin-like
structures instead of flower buds (Okada et al. 1991
; Galweiler et al.
1998
). PIN1 encodes a membrane protein that likely functions
as an auxin efflux carrier expressed in vascular tissues (Galweiler et
al. 1998
). A second related protein, EIR1/AGR1/AtPIN2, performs a similar function in the epidermal and cortical cells in the
meristematic and elongation zone of the root (Chen et al. 1998
;
Luschnig et al. 1998
; Muller et al. 1998
). Immunolocalization studies
have shown that PIN2 is asymmetrically localized at the periclinal side
of the carrier cells, and a model has been proposed that explains
directional auxin fluxes in the root (Muller et al. 1998
). Pid1 mutants are similar to pin1 in appearance and
are also deficient in auxin transport (Okada et al. 1991
).
PID1 encodes a serine-threonine protein kinase, suggesting a
signaling or regulatory function (Christensen et al. 2000
). The influx
carrier, an amino acid permease-like protein, is encoded by the
AUX1 gene (Bennett et al. 1996
; Marchant et al. 1999
). Roots
of the aux1 mutant are defective in gravitropic responses and
resistant to exogenous auxin (Pickett et al. 1990
).
tir3 (transport inhibitor
response 3) mutants were isolated in a screen for
resistance to the inhibitory effects of NPA on root elongation (Ruegger
et al. 1997
). The mutants have a pleotropic phenotype, including
decreased inflorescence height, decreased petiole and root length,
fewer and shorter siliques, and reduced apical dominance. In addition,
tir3 plants display reduced lateral root production, a process
that depends on polar auxin transport from the shoot (Reed et al.
1998
). These defects are associated with decreased polar auxin
transport in the inflorescence and a reduction in the number of
NPA-binding sites. These results suggest that the NBP has a positive
role in polar auxin transport and that TIR3 either encodes the
NBP or is required for its expression, localization, or stabilization.
An interesting link has been established between polar auxin transport
and light responses in hypocotyl growth in Arabidopsis. Steindler and coworkers (1999)
have reported that the light-regulated ATHB-2 gene acts as a negative regulator of shade-induced
hypocotyl elongation, and they found this response to be altered in the auxin response mutant axr1-2. A role in this response for
auxin transport was supported by experiments in which treatments with NPA caused reduced hypocotyl elongation in response to low red light to
far-red light (R:FR) ratios (Steindler et al. 1999
). These results are
consistent with experiments performed with Arabidopsis seedlings in which auxin transport was blocked with NPA, suggesting that auxin transport is required for phytochrome-regulated hypocotyl elongation in light-grown plants (Jensen et al. 1998
). Additional data
indicating a strong connection between light and auxin transport include reported changes in auxin transport rate and intensity induced
by dim red light treatments in cucumber seedlings (Shinkle et al. 1998
)
and differential growth mediated by lateral transport of auxin
triggered by phototropic responses in pea and tobacco (Li et al. 1991
).
At the molecular level, one of the best-studied plant responses to
light is the transcriptional regulation of nuclear genes encoding
photosynthetic proteins, including the chlorophyll a/b-binding proteins
of photosystem II (CAB; Terzaghi and Cashmore 1995
). CAB genes are expressed at high levels in the light in green
plants and at low levels in dark-grown seedlings. The DOC1
gene (dark overexpression of
CAB) was identified as a putative component of
light signal transduction pathways regulating this response because
mutations in the locus lead to overexpression of CAB genes in
the dark (Li et al. 1994
). Unlike more pleiotropic mutants with
increased CAB mRNA levels in the dark, such as shy2-1
and the det/cop/fus class (Kim et al. 1998
; Hardtke and Deng
2000
), doc1 seedlings have etiolated morphology when
germinated in the dark. Thus, the phenotype of dark-grown doc1
plants suggests that the expression of some light-regulated genes could
be genetically separated from the morphological changes that occur
during the transition from etiolated to photosynthetic growth.
In this report, we show that doc1 mutants are allelic to tir3 mutants. We describe the cloning of the gene identified by these mutants that we have renamed BIG, owing to its large size. The BIG gene is predicted to encode an enormous protein with significant identity to the Drosophila protein Calossin/Pushover. To better understand the connection between the light- and auxin-related phenotypes, we have performed expression-profiling experiments. These results reveal that altered expression of light-regulated genes in etiolated doc1 seedlings can be suppressed by increasing endogenous auxin levels. In addition, we have shown that NPA has an unusual effect on PIN1 localization in the doc1/tir3 mutants. We propose that the reduction in levels of NBP in the doc1/tir3 mutants affects cellular localization or function of auxin efflux carriers.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Isolation of new doc1 alleles
To further characterize the DOC1 locus, we isolated new
doc1 alleles using two approaches. In the first approach, a
doc1 ap3-1 double mutant in the Columbia background was
constructed. The ap3-1 mutant contains a temperature-sensitive
allele of the apetala3 homeotic gene, which is male sterile at
the nonpermissive temperature (Sablowski and Meyerowitz 1998
). This
feature was used to facilitate crosses of
-ray-mutagenized pollen
from DOC1 plants of the Landsberg erecta
(La-er) accession onto the doc1 ap3-1 mutant. We
screened ~2000 M1 lines for the doc1 visible phenotype and
identified doc1-2, a line that contained Landsberg DNA at PCR
markers <0.2 cM from docl. The progeny of this line consisted
of plants with reduced height and increased numbers of inflorescences.
Our second approach to isolate new doc1 alleles was to screen
transferred-DNA (T-DNA) mutagenized Arabidopsis lines for the
morphological phenotype of doc1. During this screen we
identified the doc1-3 mutant and confirmed that it was a new
doc1 allele by complementation analysis.
The tir3-1 and doc1-1 mutants define mutations in a single gene and have similar defects in auxin transport and CAB gene expression
The Arabidopsis tir3 mutations map to the
same region of chromosome 3 as the doc1 mutations and cause
very similar morphological defects (Li et al. 1994
; Ruegger et al.
1997
). Although tir3 and doc1 mutants were isolated
in very different mutant screens, complementation tests indicated that
tir3-1 and doc1-1 were alleles (data not shown). To
determine if each mutation conferred a similar set of defects, we
performed auxin transport and CAB gene expression studies on
the doc1-1 and tir3-1 alleles, respectively (Fig.
1). As for tir3-1, doc1-1
stem segments transported approximately one third the amount of IAA
compared with that of wild type during an 18-h period, indicating that
doc1-1 has an auxin transport defect (Fig. 1B). Likewise, an
analysis of CAB2 gene expression in light- and dark-grown
tir3-1 seedlings showed that CAB2 mRNA was more
abundant in the dark-grown seedlings compared with wild-type seedlings
(Fig. 1A). Thus, the tir3 and doc1 mutations appear to have similar, if not identical, effects on these diverse aspects of
plant growth and development.
|
Expression profiling of doc1 and doc1 yucca1 mutants
To further examine the effects of the doc1/tir3 mutations
on light-regulated gene expression, we performed expression-profiling experiments using the commercially available Arabidopsis
Affymetrix GeneChip. These chips monitor the expression of >8200
genes. Of these, >5000 genes gave signals that were significantly
above the background in both dark-grown wild-type and doc1-1
seedlings. Any genes that gave a signal below or near the background
were assigned as absent on the chip and were not subjected to further analysis. Among 77 genes expressed at least threefold higher in dark-grown doc1-1 than in wild type, we identified many known light-regulated genes, including components of the photosynthetic machinery (Fig. 2B), nitrate reductase, and
genes encoding enzymes participating in flavonoid biosynthesis (Table
1). Interestingly, multiple enzymes for the
latter pathway were overexpressed, suggesting increased production of
anthocyanins and related ultraviolet-protective pigments. When the
doc1-1 mutant was grown in the light, transcripts for the
CAB genes, light-regulated genes, and flavonoid biosynthetic genes that were overexpressed in dark-grown doc1-1 accumulated to similar levels in the mutant compared with the wild type (Li et al.
1994
; data not shown). There were also 22 genes, of no particular
classification, that had at least a threefold decrease in expression
level in doc1-1. Genes with predicted functions with altered
expression in dark-grown doc1-1 are shown in Table 1. Because
doc1-1 was originally isolated as a mutant with elevated expression of CAB genes in the dark and was later found to be allelic to tir3, we suspected that the derepression of
CAB expression might be the result of altered auxin
distribution. To test this hypothesis, we made use of a recently
identified auxin overproducing mutant called yucca. The
YUCCA gene encodes a flavin monooxygenase-like enzyme, and its
overexpression in the yucca mutant has been shown to produce
at least 50% more free IAA than wild type (Zhao et al. 2001
). Because
yucca has a phenotype affecting all parts of the seedling, we
hypothesized that yucca would suppress doc1-1 if
defects in auxin distribution were responsible for the observed doc1 phenotype. As expected, the dark-grown yucca
doc1-1 double mutant looked similar to the yucca mutant
(Fig. 2A), and light-regulated genes were not overexpressed (Fig. 2B).
Of the 99 genes with altered expression in dark-grown doc1
mutants, 73 genes were restored to wild-type levels by overexpression
of YUCCA (Table 1). These results suggest that altered levels
of expression of light-regulated genes in dark-grown doc1 are
due to lower concentrations of auxin in some cells, resulting from
defective polar auxin transport. The hypothesis that auxin needs to be
transported to specific target cells to repress the expression of
light-regulated genes is consistent with the fact that exogenous auxin
failed to suppress the altered CAB gene expression in
dark-grown doc1 seedlings (data not shown). In the light, the
aerial phenotype of the double-mutant yucca doc1-1 included
long hypocotyls and epinastic cotyledons similar to the yucca
mutant. However, the double mutant displayed defective lateral root
formation like the doc1-1 mutant.
|
|
Interactions of tir3 with mutations affecting auxin response and transport
To further investigate the function of DOC1/TIR3 in auxin-regulated processes, we generated double mutants between tir3-1 and mutations affecting either auxin transport or response. The phenotypes of the tir3-1 pin1 and tir3-1 pid1 double mutants were very similar. In each case, the double mutant had smaller rosette leaves and shorter petioles than either single mutant (Fig. 3D,F). In the case of tir3-1 pid1, rosette leaves often had a fused or lobed appearance. In both double mutants, the primary inflorescence failed to elongate. Removal of rosette leaves revealed a very short inflorescence (1 to 2 mm) that terminated in a pin (Fig. 3F). Secondary inflorescences would frequently elongate significantly, although these also terminated in a pin (data not shown).
|
The combination of tir3-1 with the auxin response mutant
axr1-12 also results in a severe phenotype. AXR1
encodes a subunit of a heterodimeric RUB-activiting enzyme that
functions in the RUB conjugation pathway. The RUB (related
to ubiquitin) protein is conjugated to the cullin component
of SCF-type ubiquitin protein ligases (E3). RUB conjugation appears to
be particularly important for function of SCFTIR1, an E3
implicated in auxin response (Leyser et al. 1993
; del Pozo et al. 1998
;
Gray et al. 1999
). Thus, the axr1 mutants are deficient in all
aspects of auxin response. The tir3-1 axr1-12 double mutant is
an extreme dwarf with a phenotype much more severe than either single
mutant (Fig. 3G,H). Like the tir3-1 pin1 plants, growth of the
primary inflorescence in these double mutants arrested prematurely, in
this case at ~4 cm of height. Secondary inflorescences continued to
elongate, indicative of a loss of apical dominance. In addition, there
was very little internode elongation between adjacent flowers, so the
flowers had an extremely bunched appearance. The phenotypes of these
double mutants suggest that the combination of tir3-1 with
either pin1, pid1, or axr1 results in a
severe defect in auxin-dependent growth of the inflorescence,
presumably associated with a reduction in internode elongation and the
cessation of meristem activity shortly after the floral transition.
Identification of the DOC1/TIR3 gene
To investigate the molecular mechanism of DOC1/TIR3 action,
we cloned the gene by a combination of chromosome walking and T-DNA
tagging. First, we performed an extensive fine-mapping of the
doc1 locus by identifying recombinant chromosomes from a
mapping cross between doc1-1 (Col-0) and La-er using
cleaved amplified polymorphic sequence (CAPS) and single sequence
length polymorphism (SSLP) markers (Konieczny and Ausubel 1993
; Bell
and Ecker 1994
). DOC1 was mapped between the SSLP marker nga32
and the CAPS marker 17D8LE on the top of chromosome 3. A set of
overlapping yeast artificial chromosomes (YACs) spanning the region
between both markers had been identified previously (Bartel and Fink
1995
). YAC ends from yUP6B and yUP20D2, and the COL2 gene
(Ledger et al. 1996
) that maps between them, were isolated and
subsequently used as probes to screen cosmid and bacterial artificial
chromosome (BAC) libraries. Multiple cosmids and BACs overlapping the
region between markers nga32 and 17D8LE were identified
(Fig. 4A). Fragments from BACs F9O20,
F18H18, and F26L9 were mobilized into a binary vector and together with
cosmid clones were used to generate a complete contig.
|
Southern blot analyses using BAC F18H18 as a probe indicated that the
doc1-3 allele contains a T-DNA insertion of ~4 kb. DNA probes derived from this BAC were used in Southern blot analyses to
further delimit the T-DNA insertion site to a 2-kb genomic region
defined by the 6B2RE YAC end (Fig. 4A). Sequencing of T-DNA flanking
sequences revealed that the insertion had disrupted an open reading
frame (ORF) spanning 17,331 bp of genomic DNA represented as incomplete
fragments in several clones of our contig. Given the remarkably large
size of this gene (for Arabidopsis), we have renamed it
BIG. The putative start codon (Net Start score, 0.770) was
located immediately downstream of a DNA region of 257 bp with 60%
identity to the 5' region of an Arabidopsis
L-isoaspartylmethyltransferase gene (Mudgett and Clarke 1996
),
including a putative TATA box (TATTAAT) at position
208 with respect
to the putative start codon. BAC sequences from the putative gene were
used to screen a cDNA library and to perform BLAST searches of the
dbEST database. Several expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from
Arabidopsis identical to regions of the putative transcript
were present in GenBank. EST accession Z47688 included a poly(A) tail
that indicated that mRNAs for this gene include a 3' untranslated
region (3'UTR) of 165 bases. Overlapping cDNA clones and RT-PCR
products were assembled to reconstruct a transcript 15.4 kb long
consisting of 14 exons (Fig. 4B).
To confirm that the BIG gene was DOC1/TIR3, we identified the specific mutations in five doc1 and tir3 alleles (Fig. 4B). The T-DNA insertion in doc1-3 was localized before position +7228 with respect to the putative start codon. The mutation in doc1-1 was a base pair change from G to A at position +5513 that causes an amino acid change from Cys to Tyr. The doc1-2 and tir3-1 mutations were also found to be single base pair changes (from C at position +8872 to T and from T at position +7331 to A, respectively) likely to affect pre-mRNA splicing as they disrupt the acceptor site of intron 7 and the donor site of intron 4, respectively. The tir3-2 mutation was a small deletion from position +8874 to +8883 (CTTCAGGTTC) that causes a frame-shift of the ORF, causing a stop codon after seven amino acids. Southern analysis using fragments of the gene as probes suggested that BIG is a single copy gene (data not shown). This was later confirmed as BLAST searches to the complete Arabidopsis genome failed to identify any DNA or protein sequence similar to the BIG gene.
BIG encodes a putative member of the Calossin/Pushover family of proteins
The predicted BIG protein is 5077 amino acids long (MW 566 kD, pI
5.7) and very similar in size and features to the Drosophila protein Calossin/Pushover (CalO; GenBank no. AF096897; Xu et al. 1998
).
CalO was first identified because it binds to calmodulin in vitro (Xu
et al. 1998
). Mutations in the pushover (push) locus cause defects in behavior, altered synaptic transmission at the neuromuscular junctions, male sterility, and defective achiasmatic segregation of chromosomes in female meiosis (Richards et al. 1996
;
Sekelsky et al. 1999
). There are very similar predicted proteins of
unknown function present in the human and Caenorhabditis elegans genomes (GenBank accession nos. AB007931 and AF003140, respectively). In addition, numerous ESTs from several animals and
plants encoding putative proteins highly similar to these proteins have
been identified, suggesting that BIG belongs to a class of proteins
ubiquitously present in the plant and animal kingdoms.
Gapped alignment indicated that BIG and CalO are 28% identical at the
amino acid level over >3000 amino acids at their C terminus, with a
BLAST score of 885 and an E-value of 0.00 (Fig. 4C; Altschul et al.
1997
). However, the similarity between these proteins is not uniform.
Rather, it is particularly high (>60% identity) in several stretches
30 to 50 amino acids long, including two cysteine-rich domains that
resemble Zinc fingers. The first cysteine-rich domain (CRD-1) at amino
acid position +1564 has similarity to a putative Zinc finger domain
present in some ubiquitin ligases (Fig. 4C; Pfam accession PF02207; E
value = 2.3e-13). This domain seems to be important for BIG function
because the doc1-1 mutation is a substitution of one of the
conserved Cys to Tyr (Fig. 4C). The second conserved cysteine-rich
domain (CRD-2) at position +3442 is highly conserved among the Calossin
family of proteins (Fig. 4C) and is similar to Zn-finger domains in
eukaryotic transcription factors. A third cysteine-rich domain at
position +2597 belongs to the ZZ domain family but is not conserved in
the Calossin proteins (Fig. 4C; Pfam accession no. PF00569;
E = 1.6e-07). Proteins containing this domain include proteins that
function in the ubiquitin pathway such as HERC2 and p62 (GenBank
T14346; Vadlamudi and Shin 1998
), transcriptional coactivators such as
the CREB-binding protein (CBP) and ADA2 (Chrivia et al. 1993
; Marcus et
al. 1994
), and Dystrophyn-related proteins (Roberts and Bobrow 1998
).
Expression of BIG
Doc1/tir3 mutations cause reduced growth in most plant
organs, suggesting that BIG is expressed ubiquitously during
development (Li et al. 1994
; Ruegger et al. 1997
). However, several
putative components of the polar auxin transport machinery are
expressed preferentially in particular organs or cell types. To test if the BIG gene was expressed in specific tissues, we performed
quantitative RT-PCR analyses to monitor changes in mRNA accumulation.
We compared BIG mRNA levels in roots, rosette leaves,
inflorescence stems, and flowers. As shown in Figure
5A, BIG mRNA accumulated to
similar levels in different organs of wild-type Arabidopsis.
Because doc1/tir3 mutants display increased accumulation of
CAB mRNA in the dark, BIG mRNA levels were compared
between light-grown and dark-grown seedlings. Similarly, because of the
effects of the doc1/tir3 mutations on auxin transport, we
monitored BIG mRNA levels after seedlings were treated with 50 µM of the synthetic auxin 2,4-D. In addition, we also tested
induction of BIG with 1 µM brassinolide, a steroid hormone
known to act synergistically in several responses controlled by auxin
(Kim et al. 2000
). In all cases, BIG mRNA levels remained
unchanged (Fig. 5B). As a control for the auxin treatments, we checked
and detected elevated mRNA levels of the auxin-inducible gene
SAUR-AC1 (Fig. 5B; Gil et al. 1994
). Interestingly, this
auxin-induced transcript served as a double control, because it was
also induced by brassinolide treatment. The results of these
experiments are consistent with BIG being ubiquitously and constitutively expressed throughout the plant.
|
Localization of PIN1 in tir3 and doc1 seedlings
Because the mutant phenotype suggests a key role for BIG in polar
auxin transport (Ruegger et al. 1997
), the cellular localization of the
putative auxin efflux carrier PIN1 (Galweiler et al. 1998
) in
tir3-1 and doc1-3 was determined. Using
affinity-purified anti-PIN1 antibody, whole mount immunolocalization
experiments on Arabidopsis seedlings were performed. In
wild-type roots, PIN1 is localized at the bottom (acropetal) side of
stele cells, in some cases accompanied by a weaker signal in the
endodermis (Friml et al., in prep.). The polarity of PIN1 localization
was partially disrupted by treatment of seedlings with polar auxin
transport inhibitors like NPA (Geldner et al., in prep.). In untreated
tir3 or doc1 seedlings, no difference in PIN1
localization was detected compared with that of wild type (data not
shown). However, in mutants treated with NPA, >50% of roots
(doc1: 52%, n = 83; tir3: 61%,
n = 165), showed mislocalization of PIN1 protein to an
unidentified intracellular compartment (Fig. 6). This phenomenon was never observed in
wild-type roots (n = 167) treated with NPA.
|
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Mutations in the BIG gene were identified in two independent screens and originally characterized as mutants affecting photomorphogenesis and auxin transport. In this report, we present evidence indicating that the defect in light-regulated gene expression first identified in the doc1 mutant is caused by an alteration in auxin distribution in dark-grown seedlings. BIG was identified as a putative component of the polar auxin transport machinery because tir3 mutations promote resistance to inhibition of root growth by phytotropins, decrease IAA movement through inflorescence stems, and result in a reduction in the number of NPA-binding sites in microsomal fractions. Moreover, many of the morphological defects observed in the mutants are consistent with a defect in some aspect of auxin physiology. In this study, we provide several additional lines of evidence indicating the involvement of BIG in polar auxin transport. These include synergistic effects of the tir3 mutation with mutations that alter auxin signaling or transport, suppression of some doc1 defects by elevated levels of endogenous auxin, and effects of doc1/tir3 mutations on the intracellular localization of the auxin efflux carrier PIN1.
A number of additional mutations have been isolated that affect both
auxin physiology and photomorphogenesis. Mutations in the
shy2, axr2, and axr3 loci cause
photomorphogenesis in dark-grown seedlings, including reduced hypocotyl
length and formation of leaves (Tian and Reed 1999
; Nagpal et al.
2000
). However, unlike these signaling mutants, the doc1/tir3
defects in auxin transport have little effect on seedling morphology
and hypocotyl elongation in the dark (Li et al. 1994
) but result in
decreased hypocotyl elongation in the light. This is consistent with
results from Jensen et al. (1998)
that indicate that in
Arabidopsis, polar auxin transport is important for hypocotyl
elongation in the light but not in the dark. On the other hand, our
results indicate that overexpression of the auxin biosynthetic gene
YUCCA in the doc1-1 mutant suppresses the aberrant
expression of light-regulated genes in the dark. This result indicates
a novel and unexpected role for auxin in the repression of
light-regulated genes in dark-grown seedlings and suggests that polar
auxin transport is important in etiolated seedlings.
The tir3-1 mutation shows a strong synergistic interaction with mutations that affect either auxin response or transport, consistent with the proposed role for BIG in auxin transport. The phenotype of the tir3 pin1 double mutant includes a drastic reduction in inflorescence growth and premature arrest of this growth, suggesting that BIG and PIN1 have overlapping functions in the inflorescence. Because BIG is expressed throughout the plant, it will be interesting to determine if combination of tir3 with mutations in other members of the PIN family will result in additional synergistic effects. Multiple growth responses are also compromised in the auxin-signaling mutant axr1-12. The tir3-1 axr1-12 double mutant also had a very severe phenotype as expected for plants with defects in both auxin transport and response. One of the most interesting aspects of all three double-mutant phenotypes was the early arrest of inflorescence elongation. This observation suggests that auxin levels and/or response are limiting for inflorescence elongation and organ formation.
Any model for BIG function must explain the contradictory responses of
the doc1/tir3 mutants to NPA. On the one hand, the tir3 mutants were isolated because they are resistant to the
growth-inhibiting properties of NPA. In contrast, the
doc1/tir3 mutants appear to be hypersensitive to NPA with
respect to effects on PIN1 localization. However, this paradox can be
resolved by considering the effects of NPA on root elongation and the
basis for tir3 resistance to the compound. Evidence from a
number of studies now indicates that NPA inhibits root elongation by
promoting accumulation of IAA to inhibitor levels in the root tip
(Ruegger et al. 1997
; Sabatini et al. 1999
; Casimiro et al. 2001
). As
the tir3 mutant is deficient in auxin transport in the shoot,
it follows that less auxin is transported down into the mutant root
system. As a consequence, NPA-mediated accumulation of IAA in the root
tip is reduced, leading to less inhibition of root elongation. This view is also consistent with the decrease in lateral root formation in
tir3 seedlings, a process that depends on IAA from the shoot system. The key element of this model is that decreased inhibition of
root elongation in tir3 is not primarily due to a decrease in
the number of NPA-binding sites but rather to a decrease in auxin
transport into the root system.
In contrast, the effects of NPA on PIN1 localization are likely to be
related to a decrease in NPA-binding sites. A reduction of NPA-binding
sites is also evident in the tir3-1 mutant (Ruegger et al.
1997
), suggesting that BIG encodes or is required for expression, localization, or stabilization of the NBP. Because none of the doc1/tir3 mutations are proven null alleles, the additive
effects of doc1/tir3 mutations and NPA-treatments on PIN1
localization are not conclusive in defining a role for BIG in normal
NBP microsomal localization. Recent results have suggested that NPA
does not have a specific role in auxin transport. Rather, NPA appears
to affect trafficking of a number of unrelated proteins to the plasma membrane (Geldner et al., in prep.). The fact that auxin transport is
particularly sensitive to NPA and related compounds may be a reflection
of the importance of correct polar localization of the efflux carriers
to the auxin transport process. Consistent with this, intracellular
vesicle transport is clearly required for polar auxin transport
(Delbarre et al. 1998
; Steinmann et al. 1999
). In Drosophila,
CalO affects synaptic transmission at the neuromuscular junctions, with
specific defects in neurotransmitter release evoked by nerve
stimulation. This process is dependent on the synaptic vesicle cycle
(Sudhof 1995
). Thus, it is possible that BIG and CalO participate in
intracellular vesicle transport. There is also a well-established role
for changes of intracellular Ca2+ levels in this process.
Calossins are among the biggest proteins in eukaryotic cells. The
Drosophila CalO protein was first identified by screening a
retinal expression library for calmodulin-binding proteins (Xu et al.
1998
). At this point it is not known if BIG also binds calmodulin, but
it is possible that this protein participates in
Ca2+/calmodulin regulation of auxin transport because
Ca2+ and calmodulin have been implicated in auxin transport
responses (Lomax 1995
). Although the precise biochemical role of BIG
and other calossin-like proteins in cellular metabolism awaits further study, the presence of a number of protein domains suggests a few
general possibilities. The three Zn-finger domains are likely to
participate in protein-protein interactions, suggesting that BIG is
likely to interact with a number of other proteins. Among the Zn-finger
domains, the CDR-1 motif is very well conserved in calossins and
several ubiquitin ligases represented by the Drosophila
protein hyperplastic discs (Hyd; Mansfield et al. 1994
). This domain is
critical for BIG function because the doc1-1 mutation replaces
one of the putative Zn-binding cysteines. The function and binding
partners of the CDR-1 motif are not known. Interestingly, among the
proteins similar to BIG at another Zn-binding domain, the ZZ domain,
there is a family of very large proteins that includes dystrophin. This
protein is associated with the plasma membrane and the cytoskeleton in
postsynaptic neuronal complexes and plays a role in the maintenance of
membrane-associated complexes at points of intercellular contact
(Roberts and Bobrow 1998
). Moreover, the ZZ domain has been found to
interact with calmodulin (Anderson et al. 1996
). In the future, it will
be important to determine the cellular localization of BIG and the
identity of interacting proteins. Clearly, BIG and other calossins play
a critical role in some aspect of cellular function in both plants and animals.
| |
Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Plant materials and growth conditions
For all experiments described, unless specified otherwise, the
Arabidopsis wild type is ecotype Columbia. For mutant screens to identify new doc1 alleles, plants were grown on 0.5× MS
media plates and transferred to soil under conditions described
previously (Li et al. 1994
). To generate male sterile doc1-1
ap3-1 mutants, plants were grown initially in the greenhouse and
then transferred to 28°C before bolting. For microarray experiments,
wild-type and mutant plants (doc1-1, doc1-1 yucca, and
yucca) were grown in 0.5× MS media without sugar in the dark
at 22°C for 4 d before they were harvested for RNA preparation. For
immunolocalization experiments, seeds were surface sterilized using 5%
calcium hypochlorite and plated on 0.5× MS/1% sucrose medium. After
2-d vernalization at 4°C, seedlings were grown in vertical position
in 16-h light/8-h dark cycle at 22°C. Three- to five-day-old
seedlings were transferred into 0.5× MS/1% sucrose liquid medium
supplemented with 50 to 150 µM NPA (dissolved in DMF) and incubated
for 1 to 3 h. After incubation, they were immediately fixed for
immunolocalization experiments.
IAA transport assays
IAA transport assays were performed according to the procedure of
Okada et al. (1991)
. Stem segments (2.5 cm) of primary inflorescences were incubated in 30 µL of nutrient solution (5 mM KNO3,
2.5 mM KPO4 adjusted to pH 5.5, 2 mM MgSO4, 2 mM
Ca(NO3)2, 50 µM Fe-EDTA, 70 µM
H3BO3, 14 µM MnCl2, 0.5 µM
CuSO4, 1 µM ZnSO4, 0.2 µM
Na2MoO4, 10 µM NaCl, and 10 nM CoCl2)
in a 1.5-mL Eppendorf plastic tube. The solution contained 1 µM
14C-IAA (specific activity, 57mCi/mmole; American
Radiolabeled Biochemicals) with or without 15 µM NPA. The segments
were incubated in the apical to basal orientation in time increments of
4 h, from 2 to 18 h. After the incubation, a 5-mm section was removed
from the basal end of the segment and added to 3 mL of liquid
scintillation cocktail (Bio-Safe II). After shaking the samples at 100 rpm for at least 2 h and incubating overnight at room temperature, the amount of radioactive IAA in the stem segments was determined by
scintillation counting. The plants were grown in 24-h light (105 µE/m2sec). Results were expressed in counts per minute
±SEM.
Identification of new alleles of doc1 and genetic analysis
For the generation of the doc1-2 mutant, La-er
pollen was
-ray mutagenized by exposing inflorescence sections to 17 to 20 Krads in a 60Co irradiator. Irradiated flowers were
used for manual fertilization of doc1-1 ap3-1 mutants. The
doc1-3 allele was identified by its visible phenotype among a
collection of transgenic plants containing T-DNA insertions
(by-products of several projects) compiled by Dr. Jianming Li in Dr.
Joanne Chory's laboratory at the Salk Institute. To determine allelism
between tir3-1 and doc1-1, these mutants were
crossed, and F1 seeds were plated on nutrient media
containing 5 µM of the auxin transport inhibitor
2-carboxyphenyl-3-phenylpropane-1,2-dione (CPD) to assay resistance to
inhibition of root growth. F1 seedlings (25/25) were
resistant to CPD. The seedlings were transferred to soil for later
confirmation of a mutant aerial phenotype.
Mapping of doc1
A homozygous doc1-1 line was crossed to La-er,
and the resulting F1 plants were self-pollinated to generate
F2 plants segregating the doc1-1 mutation. DNA for
SSLP and CAPS analysis from doc1 F2 plants was
prepared as described previously (Dellaporta et al. 1983
). To place the
doc1 locus in the physical map between markers nga32 and
17D8LE, 1091 chromosomes were scored for recombination events. Standard
methods for YAC manipulation and generation of end probes were as
described (Gibson and Somerville 1992
). Cosmid library (Olszewski et
al. 1988
) and BAC filters (provided by Dr. Joe Ecker, University of
Pennsylvania) were hybridized using YAC ends as described
(Ausubel et al. 1994
;
http://http.tamu.edu:8000/~creel/BACVEC.html). The dCAPS
marker (Neff et al. 1998
) COL2 required oligonucleotides 5'-CGCCATAGGAGTTTAGAAGG-3' and
5'-CAT CACAAGTATGCTTCGCTAGCAATTGATTC-3' as primers for PCR
amplification followed by digestion with the restriction enzyme
BcgI.
DNA and RNA analysis
DNA from yeast and plant tissues was isolated according to standard
protocols (Ausubel et al. 1994
). Total RNA was purified with TRIzol
(GIBCO BRL) as indicated by the manufacturer. cDNA synthesis for
RT-PCR analyses was performed using Superscript II (GIBCO BRL) with 3 µg of total RNA as indicated by the manufacturer. PCR reactions of
12, 13, and 14 cycles (in the exponential range of amplification), were
performed by denaturing the template cDNAs at 95°C for 5 min followed
by cycles of 90°C for 30 sec, 55°C for 30 sec, and 72°C for 1 min. A DOC1 fragment was amplified using oligonucleotides 5'-
CCTGTCAAGGGTCCCTCAGTTCCC-3' from exon 13 and
5'-CCAGTTGATGATAGCTGGGATCCAGGAG-3' from exon 14 as primers. As an
internal control, we included in the PCR reactions oligonucleotides 5'-CTCTGGTGTCTTG CAGCAGCTGGACA-3' and
5'-GATCGGCCACGTTCGAAG GCAGCTC-3' as primers to amplify a fragment of
the EIF-4
cDNA (Taylor and Green 1995
). PCR products were size
fractionated by electrophoresis in 1.5% (w/v) agarose gel, blotted to
a membrane and hybridized with radiolabeled DOC1 and EIF-4
probes. Signal intensities were determined with a PhosphorImager
(Molecular Dynamics).
Microarray experiments
Total RNA extraction, cDNA synthesis, in vitro labeling, hybridization, wash, scanning, and data analysis were performed according to Affymetrix's instructions.
Antibodies and immunolocalization
The whole-mount immunolocalization experiments on
Arabidopsis seedlings were performed as described (Muller et
al. 1998
). Seedlings were fixed for 1 h under vacuum in 4%
formaldehyde, permeabilized, and incubated with primary and
subsequently secondary antibody. Affinity-purified primary anti-PIN1
antibody (Galweiler et al. 1998
) was used in dilution 1:150. The
secondary antibody, DATF-conjugated anti-rabbit antibody (Dianova),
was diluted 1:200. The samples were inspected by laser scanning
confocal microscope Leica DMIRBE, TCS 4D (Leica). The images were
further processed in Photoshop 4 (Adobe) and CorelDraw 7 (Corel Corporation).
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank Kim Hanson and Melissa McCarthy for technical support, and Adan Colon-Carmona, Jianming Li, and Karin Schumacher for their help in generating and identifying the doc1-3 T-DNA line. Seeds of ap3-1 and a cosmid library were supplied by the ABRC stock center. Jennifer Nemhauser made useful comments concerning this manuscript. This work was supported by grants from the Department of Energy (DE-FG03-89ER13993) and the National Science Foundation (MCB96-31390) to J.C., by grants from the Department of Energy (DE-FG02-98ER20313) and the National Institutes of Health (GM43644) to M.E., by a grant from DAAD to J.F., by a grant from DFG to K.P., and by a Marsden grant of New Zealand to J.P. and K.S. J.C. is an Associate Investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI), and Y.Z. is a HHMI fellow of the Life Sciences Research Foundation.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 USC section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Received April 19, 2001; revised version accepted June 4, 2001.
5 Corresponding author.
E-MAIL chory{at}salk.edu; FAX (858) 558-6379.
Article and publication are at http://www.genesdev.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gad.905201.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|