|
|
|
|
Vol. 16, No. 12, pp. 1472-1487, June 15, 2002
1 Department of Cell Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA; 2 MGH Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts 02129, USA
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The coordinated action of cell cycle progression and cell growth (an increase in cell size and cell mass) is critical for sustained cellular proliferation, yet the biochemical signals that control cell growth are poorly defined, particularly in mammalian systems. We find that cell growth and cell cycle progression are separable processes in mammalian cells and that growth to appropriate cell size requires mTOR- and PI3K-dependent signals. Expression of a rapamycin-resistant mutant of mTOR rescues the reduced cell size phenotype induced by rapamycin in a kinase-dependent manner, showing the evolutionarily conserved role of mTOR in control of cell growth. Expression of S6K1 mutants that possess partial rapamycin-resistant activity or overexpression of eIF4E individually and additively partially rescues the rapamycin-induced decrease in cell size. In the absence of rapamycin, overexpression of S6K1 or eIF4E increases cell size, and, when coexpressed, they cooperate to increase cell size further. Expression of a phosphorylation site-defective mutant of 4EBP1 that constitutively binds the eIF4E-Cap complex to inhibit translation initiation reduces cell size and blocks eIF4E effects on cell size. These data show that mTOR signals downstream to at least two independent targets, S6K1 and 4EBP1/eIF4E, that function in translational control to regulate mammalian cell size.
[Key Words: mTOR; S6K1; eIF4E; 4EBP1; size; growth]
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Coordinated increases in both cell number and cell size contribute
to the growth of an organ or whole organism (Conlon and Raff 1999
).
To remain constant in size under proliferative
conditions, cells must double in mass through increased macromolecular
biosynthesis and grow to increased size during each cell division
cycle. A sustained proliferative response therefore requires
coordination of both cell cycle progression and cell growth (increase
in cell size and cell mass), although it is unclear how this is
achieved (Neufeld and Edgar 1998
; Polymenis and Schmidt 1999
). Much
research has focused on cell cycle control, yet considerably less
attention has focused on the biochemical mechanisms that regulate cell
growth, particularly in mammalian systems.
Hartwell and colleagues showed in the budding yeast Saccharomyces
cerevisiae that inactivation of most cell division cycle (cdc)
genes encoding cell cycle regulators results in arrest at a large cell
size, indicating that when cell division is blocked, cell growth
continues (Johnston et al. 1977
). In contrast, when deprived of
nutrients or when cdc genes encoding biosynthetic proteins are
inactivated, yeast cell division and cell growth are coordinately
blocked, suggesting that sufficient cell growth is required for cell
cycle progression, but not vice versa (Johnston et al. 1977
).
Similarly, in the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, disruption of cell cycle regulatory genes (e.g., dE2F and
cdc2) results in cell cycle arrest at a large cell size
(Weigmann et al. 1997
; Neufeld et al. 1998
). These studies in model
genetic organisms have suggested that cell division and cell growth are normally coordinated yet separable processes and that cells progress through the cell cycle only when sufficient mass, size, and
biosynthesis have been reached. Whether cell cycle progression and cell growth are separable processes in mammalian cells has not been well documented.
Whereas in yeast the control of cell size seems primarily to reflect
nutrient conditions, in multicellular organisms both nutrients and
growth factor signals coordinate cell, organ, and organismal growth.
Manipulation of virtually all components of the mitogen-regulated
insulin receptor/phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) signaling pathway
in Drosophila affects cell number and cell size to produce
flies with altered organ and body size (Stocker and Hafen 2000
;
Weinkove and Leevers 2000
). In budding yeast and Drosophila,
TOR, the target of rapamycin, functions to monitor nutrient
availability, as TOR deletions in these organisms produce phenotypes
similar to those produced by nutrient deprivation (Rohde et al. 2001
).
Indeed, modulation of Drosophila TOR (dTOR) and its downstream
targets, ribosomal protein S6 kinase (dS6K) and eukaryotic initiation
factor 4E-binding protein (d4EBP), produce cell size phenotypes
(Montagne et al. 1999
; Oldham et al. 2000
; Zhang et al. 2000
; Miron et
al. 2001
). The biochemical signaling mechanisms that regulate organismal
growth and cell size in mammals are significantly less well understood.
Mammalian TOR (mTOR), also known as FRAP, RAFT, or RAPT (Brown et al.
1994
; Chiu et al. 1994
; Sabatini et al. 1994
; Sabers et al. 1995
), is a
large (289-kD), evolutionarily conserved member of the
phosphatidylinositol kinase (PIK)-related kinase family in which a
lipid kinase homology domain functions as a serine/threonine kinase to
regulate protein translation, cell cycle progression, and cellular
proliferation (Schmelzle and Hall 2000
; Gingras et al. 2001
). Rapamycin
is a highly specific inhibitor of mTOR function; when complexed with
its cellular receptor, FKBP12, rapamycin binds directly to TOR to
inhibit downstream signaling. mTOR also likely functions in a
nutritional checkpoint, as its best-characterized downstream targets,
S6K1 and 4EBP1, are sensitive to amino acid levels (Rohde et al. 2001
)
and energy status (Dennis et al. 2001
). mTOR may also respond to
mitogenic signals (Scott et al. 1998
; Sekulic et al. 2000
; Fang et al. 2001
).
In mammals, mTOR cooperates with PI3K-dependent effectors to
phosphorylate S6K1 and 4EBP1 (Dufner and Thomas 1999
; Gingras et al.
2001
). The precise relationship between mTOR and the PI3K pathway is
currently unclear, as is the mechanism by which mTOR signals to its
downstream targets. S6K1 directly phosphorylates the 40S ribosomal
protein S6, which correlates with enhanced translation of transcripts
with 5'-terminal oligopyrimidine (5'-TOP) sequences that encode
components of the translational machinery (Jefferies et al. 1997
).
Multisite phosphorylation of the translational repressor 4EBP1 results
in its dissociation from eIF4E, thereby allowing eIF4E to assemble with
eIF4G, facilitating the recruitment of other translation initiation
factors to form the eIF4F complex and initiate cap-dependent
translation (Gingras et al. 2001
).
The role of mTOR in mammalian physiology remains poorly characterized.
Here we use a cultured cell system to investigate the biochemical
signaling pathways that regulate the size of proliferating mammalian
cells. We show that cell growth and cell cycle progression are
separable and thus distinct processes in mammalian cells and that
growth to appropriate cell size requires mTOR- and PI3K-dependent signals. We identify mTOR as an important regulator of cell size and
use rapamycin as a specific tool to dissect the mTOR-dependent downstream signaling pathways that function to control cell size. We
report that S6K1 (70-kD isoform;
II) and 4EBP1/eIF4E mediate mTOR-dependent cell size control, showing important
evolutionary-functional conservation of these biochemical signaling
networks in higher eukaryotes. That rapamycin is a therapeutic
immunosuppressant also showing promise in clinical trials as an
antiproliferative drug for chemotherapy and invasive cardiology underscores
the importance of elucidating mTOR function in mammalian physiology.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
mTOR- and PI3K-mediated cell growth continues when cell cycle progression is blocked
To determine whether cell growth and cell cycle progression are separable and thus distinct processes in mammalian cells, we examined the effect of blocking cell cycle progression on cell growth in cultured mammalian cells. To block cell cycle progression, rat.1a fibroblasts were transiently transfected with the cdk inhibitors p16 and p21, a dominant-negative mutant of cdk2 (cdk2-dn), or a fragment of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein, pRB (378-392), along with the cell surface marker CD20. In this way, the transfected cell populations could be gated and analyzed by flow cytometry (see Materials and Methods). Transfected cells were analyzed on a flow cytometer for DNA content and for cell size using the parameter mean forward scatter height (FSC-H), which is a measure of relative cell size. Expression of p16, p21, cdk2-dn, or pRb (378-392) all led to an increase in the percentage of cells in the G1 phase of the cell cycle and led to a striking rightward shift in the mean FSC-H histograms of G1-phase cells compared with vector controls, indicating a shift to increased cell size (Fig. 1A). Treatment of cells with chemical agents that induce a cell cycle arrest such as lovastatin (G1 arrest), mimosine (late G1 arrest), or hydroxyurea, an inhibitor of DNA synthesis (G1/S arrest), also resulted in increased cell size (data not shown). These results, which have been reproduced in two additional fibroblast cell lines (mouse NIH-3T3 and human WI38), confirm that in mammalian cells, growth continues and cell size increases when cell cycle progression is blocked; therefore, the two processes are separable and distinct.
|
To begin elucidating the biochemical signaling mechanisms responsible
for regulating growth rate and thus cell size, we used the
pharmacological drug inhibitors rapamycin and LY294002 to investigate
the effect that inhibition of mTOR- and PI3K-dependent signaling,
respectively, would have on cell size. For these experiments, we used a
rat.1a-derived cell line (RT16.15) that expresses p16 conditionally
using a tetracycline-repressible expression system (Shockett et al.
1995
). In this cell line, removal of tetracycline induced p16
expression, accumulation of cells in G1-phase, and a shift to
increased cell size as shown by mean FSC-H (Fig. 1B). Importantly, the
shift to increased cell size reflected continued cell growth, as 4 d of
p16 induction led to a fourfold increase in total protein content on a
per cell basis (data not shown). Treatment of RT16.15 cells with
rapamycin or LY294002 blocked the ability of the p16-arrested cells to
grow to increased size (Fig. 1C). Thus, in this system, mTOR- and
PI3K-dependent signals function to control growth to increased cell size.
Rapamycin and LY294002 reduce the size of cycling cells
To examine the effects that inhibition of mTOR- and PI3K-dependent signaling have on cell size using a different cultured mammalian cell system, we treated asynchronously cycling U2OS cells (human osteosarcoma) with rapamycin and LY294002, respectively, and determined the relative size of G1-phase cells by flow cytometry. After 72 h of drug treatment, both rapamycin and LY294002 clearly reduced cell size, as seen by the leftward shift of the mean FSC-H histograms (Fig. 2A). Twenty-four hours of drug treatment had a modest effect on cell size, while 48 h of drug treatment had an intermediate effect in reducing cell size (data not shown), suggesting that cell division is required to effect a shift to reduced cell size. As seen with the rat.1a cells, LY294002 treatment had a greater effect on cell size (14% decrease) than did rapamycin (10% decrease; Fig. 2B), suggesting that PI3K signals to mTOR-independent targets that function in cell size control. Importantly, both rapamycin and LY294002 reduced the proliferative rate (Fig. 2C), and 72 h of drug treatment induced an accumulation of cells in G1 phase (Fig. 2D), inhibited S6K1 activity (Fig. 2E), reduced phosphorylation of 4EBP1 (Fig. 2E), and increased association of 4EBP1 with the eIF4E-Cap complex (Fig. 2E), as expected. To determine whether rapamycin reduces cell size during other phases of the cell cycle, we examined the mean FSC-H of S-phase and G2/M-phase cells. Rapamycin decreased cell size across all phases of the cell cycle, but the effect was most striking in the G1 phase (Fig. 2F). Rapamycin treatment for 3 d also led to an ~30% decrease in total cellular protein content (Fig. 2G), consistent with its known inhibitory effects on translation. Lastly, we assayed the effect of rapamycin on cell size in other cultured cell types to determine how universal is the effect of rapamycin on cell size. Although rapamycin reduced cell size by ~10% in both U2OS and 293E cells (human embryonic kidney), it had a more modest effect on HeLa cells (human cervical carcinoma), decreasing cell size by ~4% (Fig. 2H).
|
mTOR-dependent signaling controls cell size
As the specificity of LY294002 for type I PI3K is questionable
(Brunn et al. 1996
), we focused on characterizing the role of mTOR in
control of cell size, because rapamycin is known to be a highly
specific inhibitor of mTOR. The rapamycin data above implicate mTOR in
control of cell size. To conclusively prove that inhibition of mTOR is
the mechanism by which rapamycin reduces cell size, we took advantage
of a rapamycin-resistant (RR) isoform of mTOR. Rapamycin-resistant mTOR
(RR-mTOR) contains a point mutation (S2035I) in the FRB (FKBP12 and
rapamycin binding) domain, rendering mTOR unable to bind to and be
inhibited by the rapamycin/FKBP12 complex (Stan et al. 1994
; Chen et
al. 1995
; Choi et al. 1996
). When transiently transfected into cells,
RR-mTOR is active and able to signal downstream to both S6K1 and 4EBP
in the presence of drug (Brown et al. 1995
; Hara et al. 1997
). To
establish a role for mTOR kinase activity, we also used kinase dead
(KD) mTOR constructs rendered inactive by point mutation (D2338A) in
the kinase domain.
Before determining whether expression of RR-mTOR can rescue the reduced
cell size phenotype induced by rapamycin, we first established that
RR-mTOR behaves as expected in our cell system. When transiently
transfected into U2OS cells, wild-type (WT) and RR-mTOR
autophosphorylated in vitro, whereas the kinase dead mutants (RR/KD and
KD) did not (data not shown). After transient transfection of the
various mTOR constructs, only RR-mTOR restored phosphorylation of
endogenous ribosomal protein S6 and cotransfected 4EBP1 during 20 h of
rapamycin treatment, as assayed by anti-phospho-S6 immunoblotting and 4EBP1
mobility shift (Fig. 3A). It is important to
note that the degree of S6 phosphorylation observed in this context is
actually an underestimate, as the phosphorylation state of endogenous, not transfected, S6 protein was examined. Thus, as expected, expression of RR-mTOR in U2OS cells is able to rescue rapamycin-inhibited downstream signaling in a kinase-dependent manner, consistent with what
has been previously published in other cell types (Brown et al. 1995
;
Hara et al. 1997
).
|
To assay the ability of RR-mTOR to block the shift to reduced cell size that occurs with rapamycin treatment, we transiently transfected U2OS cells with the panel of mTOR constructs plus the cell surface marker CD20, followed by determination of the size of transfected G1-phase cells on a flow cytometer. Rapamycin treatment for 72 h induced a leftward shift of the mean FSC-H histograms of cells expressing pcDNA3 vector control, WT-mTOR, RR/KD-mTOR, and KD-mTOR, but expression of RR-mTOR largely blocked this effect (Fig. 3B). Although rapamycin reduced cell size slightly (3%) in cells expressing RR-mTOR, this reduction in size was not statistically significant (Fig. 3C). This experiment clearly shows that expression of RR-mTOR is sufficient to rescue the reduced cell size phenotype induced by rapamycin and that the kinase activity of mTOR is required for this effect.
Additionally, we confirmed that expression of RR-mTOR allows signaling to S6K1 and 4EBP1 during rapamycin treatment under conditions identical to those used for analysis of cell size by flow cytometry. U2OS cells were transiently cotransfected with vector control, WT-mTOR, and RR-mTOR plasmids together with either S6K1 or 4EBP1 and incubated in the absence or presence of rapamycin for 72 h under conditions identical to those used for the cell size experiments. In the presence of drug, RR-mTOR but not WT-mTOR restored phosphorylation and activity of S6K1, phosphorylation of ribosomal protein S6 (Fig. 3D, left panel), and phosphorylation of 4EBP1 (Fig. 3D, right panel).
Restoration of S6K1 and eIF4E signaling partially rescues cell size during rapamycin treatment
To determine whether signaling from mTOR to S6K1 can rescue cell
size during rapamycin treatment, we took advantage of
rapamycin-resistant mutants of S6K1 (70 kD isoform;
II), coined
E389D3E (Pearson et al. 1995
) and
E389
CT (Schalm and Blenis 2002
), as well as wild-type and
kinase dead constructs. It is important to note that these
rapamycin-resistant mutants of S6K1 only show partial activity in the
presence of rapamycin. To confirm the behavior of these RR-S6K1
constructs in our cell system, U2OS cells were transiently transfected
with a panel of S6K1 constructs and incubated in the absence or
presence of rapamycin for 20 h. Only the rapamycin-resistant mutants
(E389D3E and E389
CT) retained significant S6
kinase activity (40%-50% the activity of WT-S6K1 in the absence of
rapamycin) and mediated S6 phosphorylation during rapamycin treatment
(Fig. 4A).
|
To determine whether signaling from mTOR to S6K1 is sufficient to
restore cell size during rapamycin treatment, we transiently transfected U2OS cells with the panel of S6K1 constructs plus CD20
followed by analysis of cell size by flow cytometry. Expression of both
E389D3E-S6K1 and E389
CT-S6K1 partially
rescued the decrease in cell size induced by rapamycin, but the pRK7
vector control and WT-S6K1 did not (Fig. 4B). Importantly, the
increased cell size shown by cells expressing RR-S6K1s after rapamycin
treatment is statistically significant when compared with those
expressing the pRK7 vector control. We additionally confirmed that the
RR-S6K1s retained activity in the presence of rapamycin under
conditions identical to those used for determination of cell size by
flow cytometry (e.g., 72 h of rapamycin; Fig. 3C). Interestingly, cells expressing exogenous S6K1 in the absence of rapamycin show increased cell size, an observation that we more carefully follow up below in Figure 6.
To investigate whether signaling from mTOR to 4EBP1/eIF4E is sufficient
to rescue the reduced cell size phenotype induced by rapamycin, we
overexpressed eIF4E by transient transfection. Because cellular eIF4E
levels are limiting for function, overexpression of eIF4E blocks the
ability of 4EBP1 to mediate translational repression in response to
rapamycin (Sonenberg and Gingras 1998
) and transforms rodent
fibroblasts (Lazaris-Karatzas et al. 1990
). Transfection of eIF4E
produced cells that showed larger cell size after rapamycin treatment
than those transfected with the pMV7 vector control, a difference that
is statistically significant (Fig. 5A).
Thus, similarly to RR-S6Ks, eIF4E overexpression is sufficient to
partially rescue the decrease in cell size induced by rapamycin. Once
again, cells expressing exogenous eIF4E show increased cell size in the
absence of rapamycin, which we more carefully investigate in Figure
6. To show that the rescue
of cell size by eIF4E is mediated by a Cap-dependent mechanism, in an
independent experiment, we coexpressed a phosphorylation site-defective mutant of 4EBP1 (AA-4EBP1; Thr37Ala/Thr46Ala) that constitutively binds
to the eIF4E-Cap complex to inhibit Cap-dependent translation (Gingras
et al. 1999
). Coexpression of AA-4EBP1 blocked the ability of eIF4E to
rescue cell size in the presence of rapamycin (Fig. 5B). To determine
whether both the S6K1 and 4EBP1/eIF4E pathways independently modulate
cell size, we coexpressed lesser amounts of
E389D3E-S6K1 and eIF4E and determined cell size
after rapamycin treatment (Fig. 5C). Whereas expression of these lower
levels of E389D3E-S6K1 or eIF4E individually did
not significantly increase cell size in the presence of rapamycin
compared with vector control, coexpression of both
E389D3E-S6K1 and eIF4E increased cell size in the
presence of rapamycin in a statistically significant manner (Fig. 5C).
These results indicate that signaling from mTOR to both S6K1 and
4EBP1/eIF4E independently modulates cell size and that both
mTOR-dependent pathways cooperate with each other to promote cell
growth and increased cell size.
|
|
Overexpression of S6K1, eIF4E, and 4EBP1 modulate cell size
We also investigated the role of S6K1 and 4EBP1/eIF4E in control of
cell size by assaying the size of cells transfected with S6K1, eIF4E,
and 4EBP1 in the absence of rapamycin. Cells expressing S6K1 showed an
~5% increase in mean FSC-H compared with pRK7 vector control or
KD-S6K1 transfected cells (Figs. 4B,
Rapa,
6A), indicating that even in full
serum-containing media, S6K1 overexpression is sufficient to drive an
increase in cell growth and cell size in a manner dependent on kinase
activity. Importantly, expression of WT- and KD-S6K1 were similar in
this experiment (Fig. 6A, inset). Similarly, U2OS cells overexpressing
eIF4E were ~5% larger than those transfected with the pMV7 vector
control (Figs. 5A,
Rapa, 6B), and coexpression of AA-4EBP1 blocked
the ability of eIF4E to drive growth to increased cell size (Fig. 6C).
To determine whether the S6K1 and 4EBP1/eIF4E pathways independently
drive an increase in cell size in the absence of rapamycin, S6K1 and eIF4E were coexpressed. Transfection of lesser amounts of S6K1 and
eIF4E did not significantly increase cell size, whereas coexpression of
both S6K1 and eIF4E cooperated to increase cell size (Figs. 5C,
Rapa,
6D). These results confirm that signaling from mTOR to both S6K1 and
4EBP1/eIF4E independently modulate cell size and cooperate with each
other in an additive manner.
To examine the role of the 4EBP1/eIF4E pathway in control of cell size in a different way, we overexpressed WT-4EBP1 and the phosphorylation site-defective mutant of 4EBP1, AA-4EBP1. AA-4EBP1 reduced cell size over the pACTAG-2 vector control in full serum-containing media in a statistically significant manner, but overexpression of WT-4EBP1 had no effect on cell size (Fig. 6E). Importantly, WT- and AA-4EBP1 were expressed to similar levels in this experiment, and AA-4EBP1 showed eIF4E-Cap-binding activity, whereas WT-4EBP1 did not (Fig. 6F). These data suggest that the effect of AA-4EBP1 in reducing cell size is likely mediated by inhibition of Cap-dependent translation.
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although control of cell cycle progression has received considerable
attention, the biochemical mechanisms that regulate cell growth are
much less well understood, particularly in mammals. Our data show that
in mammalian cells, as in yeast and flies, cell cycle progression and
cell growth are separable and thus distinct processes: Cells continue
to increase in size when cell division is blocked by the expression of
cell cycle inhibitory proteins or by treatment with various chemical
agents. Similarly, increased cell volume results when rat Schwann cells
are treated with aphidicolin, an inhibitor of DNA synthesis (Conlon et
al. 2001
). Therefore, cell division cannot be rate-limiting for cell growth. We find that the pharmacological inhibitors rapamycin and
LY294002 reduce the size of proliferating cells, implicating mTOR- and
PI3K-dependent signaling mechanisms, respectively, in the control of
cell size (Fig. 7). These data are
consistent with the reduced cell size phenotypes observed in
Drosophila when dTOR (Oldham et al. 2000
; Zhang et al. 2000
)
or Dp110, the catalytic subunit of PI3K, is inactivated (Leevers et al.
1996
; Weinkove et al. 1999
). Interestingly, we find that LY294002 has a
greater effect on cell size than rapamycin using two different
experimental approaches, suggesting that PI3K (or other PI3K-like
enzymes) signals to targets other than those that are coordinately
regulated by mTOR to modulate cell size; similarly, LY294002 was shown
to block muscle cell hypertrophy to a greater extent than rapamycin in
terminally differentiated myotubes (Bodine et al. 2001
; Rommel et al.
2001
). Akt/PKB (protein kinase B) is a likely candidate to mediate
these PI3K-dependent/mTOR-independent effects on cell size, because
Akt/PKB phosphorylates and inactivates GSK3, an inhibitor of eIF2B, as
well as 4EBP1 (Gingras et al. 1998
; Welsh et al. 1998
). Indeed,
modulation of Akt expression produces strong cell size phenotypes in
Drosophila (Verdu et al. 1999
) and transgenic mice (Shioi et
al. 2002
), and Akt/PKB and a dominant-interfering mutant of GSK3
induce muscle myotube hypertrophy (Rommel et al. 2001
). Thus, Akt/PKB
signalling along both mTOR-dependent and -independent pathways controls
translation initiation and cell growth.
|
Using a rapamycin-resistant mutant of mTOR, we show that inhibition of
mTOR is the mechanism by which rapamycin reduces cell size. This
observation alone is important, as a loss-of-function mutation in mTOR
was recently reported in the flat-top mouse (Hentges et al. 2001
).
Although mTOR inactivation in this mouse is developmentally lethal,
similar to the phenotype resulting from dTOR inactivation in flies
(Oldham et al. 2000
; Zhang et al. 2000
), embryonic cells from this
mouse show no reduction in cell size (Hentges et al. 2001
). The reason
for this discrepancy is unclear, but perhaps different cell types
possess different degrees of dependency for mTOR in control of cell
growth, or compensatory pathways are up-regulated. As the flat-top
mouse is not null for mTOR, it is also possible that low levels of
residual signaling are sufficient to maintain cell growth.
Our data provide further evidence that mTOR independently signals to
both S6K1 and 4EBP1/eIF4E to control cell size (Fig. 7). Consistently,
the kinase activity of mTOR is required both for cell size control and
signaling to S6K1 and 4EBP1 (Brown et al. 1995
; Brunn et al. 1997
).
Increased S6K1 activity and eIF4E expression increase cell size in both
the presence and absence of rapamycin, individually and additively.
Because the activities of the S6K1 mutants used in this study show only
partial resistance to the inhibitory effects of rapamycin, it is not
unexpected that the RR-S6K1s only partially rescue the
rapamycin-induced decrease in cell size. Furthermore, given that
rapamycin would be expected to inhibit the formation of functional
translation initiation complexes, it is also not unexpected that eIF4E
overexpression only slightly increases cell size during rapamycin
treatment. Cap-dependent translation likely mediates the effects of
eIF4E on cell size, as a phosphorylation site-defective mutant of 4EBP1 that constitutively binds the eIF4E-Cap complex to function as a
dominant translational repressor blocks eIF4E effects on cell size. On
its own, expression of this 4EBP1 mutant is sufficient to reduce cell
size. Our data are consistent with results in Drosophila; Modulation of dS6K (Montagne et al. 1999
), d4EBP1 (Miron et al. 2001
),
and deIF4E (Lachance et al. 2002
) expression all produce cell size
phenotypes. Additionally, in mammals, it was reported that S6K1
overexpression induces skeletal myotube hypertrophy (Rommel et al.
2001
), and S6K1 null mice show reduced body (Shima et al. 1998
) and
-cell size (Pende et al. 2000
). Thus, our data show that the
function of the TOR-dependent targets S6K1 and 4EBP1/eIF4E in cell size
control is evolutionarily conserved from flies to mammals.
Although it is tempting to assume that the role of S6K1 in cell size
regulation is mediated by phosphorylation of ribosomal protein S6,
other targets of S6K1 include the transcription factor CREM-
(de
Groot et al. 1994
), the RNA splicing/export factor CBP80 (Wilson et al.
2000
), the translation elongation regulator eEF2 kinase (Wang et al.
2001
), and the proapoptotic protein BAD (Harada et al. 2001
; Fig. 7).
Furthermore, S6K1 null mice possess normal S6 phosphorylation and
5'-TOP translation owing to the presence of the S6K1 homolog, S6K2
(Shima et al. 1998
), supporting the idea that S6K1 has targets other
than ribosomal protein S6 that function to regulate organismal and cell
size. Hence, S6K1-dependent cell size control may be independent of S6
phosphorylation and 5'-TOP translation. The mechanism by which S6K1
promotes increased cell growth and cell size awaits future work.
Although we have focused on the control of cell size, inhibition of
mTOR is best known to inhibit proliferation by delaying cell cycle
progression (Abraham and Wiederrecht 1996
). Although the mechanisms
that operate in mammals to coordinate cell growth and cell cycle
progression are currently unclear, mTOR emerges as an attractive
candidate as a central coordinator. mTOR may coordinate these processes
by independently regulating cell growth and cell cycle progression by
distinct mechanisms or by primarily regulating cell growth, with cell
cycle progression a secondary consequence of increased protein
biosynthetic rate and sufficient accumulation of cell mass and cell size.
Previous work suggested a dependence of cell cycle progression on cell
growth, but not vice versa, leading to the postulation of a cell growth
checkpoint for cell cycle progression (Johnston et al. 1977
). Our
finding that rapamycin-treated cells progress through the cell cycle
and proliferate at reduced cell size suggests that if a cell growth
checkpoint exists, it must be dynamic and responsive to the
extracellular milieu. Indeed, yeast grown on poor carbon sources
proliferate at reduced cell size (Flick et al. 1998
), and rat Schwann
cells divide at a size that varies depending on the concentration of
growth factor in the media (Conlon et al. 2001
). A hypothetical cell
growth checkpoint could measure cell mass and cell size directly, or
indirectly by measuring accumulation of a specific protein or set of
proteins whose expression correlates with increased cellular mass and
size during cell growth. Regulation of the budding yeast
G1-cyclin CLN3 provides evidence for the latter model whereby
synthesis of a cell cycle driver is sensitive to the protein
biosynthetic capacity of the cell: Nutrients regulate the TOR-dependent
translation of CLN3 (Barbet et al. 1996
), and a short upstream open
reading frame (uORF) in the CLN3 mRNA 5' leader attenuates
translation of full-length CLN3 protein during suboptimal growth
conditions when ribosome content is limiting (Polymenis and Schmidt 1997
).
Translation initiation is a cellular response to both mitogenic
stimulation and nutrient availability, important for cell growth, cell
cycle progression, and cell proliferation (Gingras et al. 2001
). The
signaling molecules that we have identified as regulators of cell size
function in translational control and are regulated by both mTOR- and
PI3K-dependent mechanisms. In aggregate, our data suggest that S6K1 and
4EBP1/eIF4E function to integrate nutritional and mitogenic signals to
regulate mammalian cell growth and cell size, showing important
evolutionary conservation of these biochemical signaling networks.
| |
Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Materials
Rapamycin was provided by S.N. Seghal (Wyeth-Ayerst), and LY294002 was from Calbiochem. The RNase A and Fugene 6 transfection reagent were from Roche. The nitrocellulose membrane was from Schleicher and Schuell. All other chemicals were from Sigma.
Antibodies
Monoclonal anti-p16 antibodies have been described (Koh et al.
1995
). Anti-AU1 monoclonal antibodies were from Covance. Anti-CD20-FITC monoclonal antibodies were from BD-Biosciences. Anti-HA monoclonal antibodies were kindly provided by Margaret Chou (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia). Anti-phospho-S6 antibodies were kindly provided by Morris Birnbaum (University of Pennsylvania and HHMI, Philadelphia). Anti-eIF4E antibodies were from Cell Signaling Technology, and anti-4EBP1 antibodies were a kind gift from A.A.A. Thomas (University of Utrecht). Anti-S6K1 (Cheatham et al. 1995
) and
anti-MAPK (Chen et al. 1992
) antibodies have been described. For
immunoblotting, anti-rabbit and anti-mouse horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies were from Amersham and Chemicon, respectively.
Plasmids
Eukaryotic expression plasmids for pRb (328-392), p16, p21, and
cdk2-dn have been described, respectively (Hu et al. 1990
; van den
Heuvel and Harlow 1993
; Koh et al. 1995
; LaBaer et al. 1997
).
pcDNA3/AU1-mTOR eukaryotic expression plasmids encoding wild-type (WT),
rapamycin-resistant (RR; Ser2035Ile), kinase-dead (KD; Asp2338Ala), and
double RR/KD alleles of rat mTOR were kindly provided by Robert Abraham
(Burnham Institute, San Diego, CA) and have been described (Brunn et
al. 1997
). pRK7/HA-S6K1 eukaryotic expression plasmids encoding
wild-type (WT) and kinase dead (KD; Lys100Arg) alleles of rat S6K1
(70-kD isoform;
II) have been described previously (Cheatham et al.
1995
). The two partially rapamycin-resistant mutants of S6K1,
E389D3E (Pearson et al. 1995
) and
E389
CT (Schalm and Blenis 2002
) have been described.
E389D3E containing the point mutations T389E,
S411D, S418D, T421E, and S424D was generated in this lab but was
originally described elsewhere (Pearson et al. 1995
). The plasmids
pMV7/3HA-eIF4E, pACTAG2/HA-WT-4EBP1, and pACTAG2/HA-AA-4EBP1 were
generously provided by Nahum Sonenberg (McGill University, Montreal,
Quebec, Canada). AA-4EBP1 is a phosphorylation site-defective mutant
that contains two point mutations: Thr37Ala and Thr46Ala (Gingras et
al. 1999
).
Cell culture and transfection
Rat.1A fibroblasts were cultured at 37°C and 5% CO2 in
Dulbecco's modified Eagle's media (DMEM) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). Rat.1a cells were transiently transfected on 10-cm plates by the
CaPO4 method using 20 µg of total DNA as described (Ausubel et al. 1999
). The p16-inducible rat.1A cell line, RT16.15,
was generated using the Shockett two-plasmid system (Life Technologies) in which a tetracycline (tet)-regulated construct is repressed in the
presence of tetracycline (Shockett et al. 1995
). To generate a parent
cell line containing the tetracycline-regulated activator, rat.1A cells
were cotransfected with pTet-TAK and pCMV-neo, and stable clones were
selected in DMEM/10% FBS supplemented with 400 µg/mL G418 and 1 µg/mL tetracycline. Two clones were chosen for further manipulation,
as they showed low basal activity and a 20-fold induction of luciferase
activity upon removal of tetracycline after transient transfection with
a tetracycline-regulated luciferase construct, pUHC13-3. A
tetracycline-regulated p16 construct, pUp16 (a gift from Greg Enders,
University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia) was next cotransfected with a
puromycin selectable marker (pBABE-Puro) and selected in DMEM/10% FBS
supplemented with 1 µg/mL puromycin, 400 µg/mL G418, and 1 µg/mL
tetracycline. Two clones that showed tetracycline-regulated p16
expression by immunofluorescence and immunoblotting were selected for
further analysis. Characterization of one of these clones, RT16.15, is
shown here, although the other clone behaves similarly.
Human U2OS osteosarcoma cells were cultured at 37°C and 5% CO2 in DMEM/10% FBS. Cells were seeded on 60-mm plates 1 d prior to transfection with Fugene 6 overnight according to the manufacturer's directions using 5 to 10 µg of total DNA, depending on the experiment. Cells were washed once with STE at pH 7.2 (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA) and either fed immediately with DMEM/10% FBS or trypsinized to new 10-cm plates in the absence or presence of rapamycin (20 ng/mL). For immunoblot analysis, cells were lysed after either 20 or 72 h; for analysis of cell size by flow cytometry, cells were harvested after 72 h.
Cell lysis and immunoblotting
Cells were washed twice with ice-cold STE at pH 7.2, scraped into
BLB lysis buffer at pH 7.2 (10 mM KPO4, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM MgCl2, 50 mM
-glycerophosphate, 5 mM EGTA, 0.5% NP-40,
0.1% Brij-35, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 40 µg/mL PMSF, 10 µg/mL
leupeptin, 5 µg/mL pepstatin A), and spun at 15,000 rpm for 10 min.
Lysates were subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
(PAGE), transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, immunoblotted with
primary antibodies followed by horseradish peroxidase-conjugated
secondary antibodies, and developed via enhanced chemiluminescence
(ECL). Bradford assay was used to determine protein content (Bio-Rad).
Immunoprecipitations and immune complex kinase assays
Cell extracts were immunoprecipitated with anti-HA antibodies for 2 h followed by incubation with protein A-sepharose CL4B beads
(Pharmacia) for 1 h. Immunoprecipitates were washed with 1 mL each of
ice-cold buffer A, buffer B, and ST, as described (Martin et al. 2001
).
Kinase activity in washed immunoprecipitates was assayed as described
using recombinant GST-S6 (32 C-terminal amino acids of ribososomal
protein S6) as in vitro substrate, as described (Martin et al. 2001
).
The amount of 32P incorporated into GST-S6 was assessed by
autoradiography and quantitated on a Bio-Rad PhosphorImager with
ImageQuant software.
m7GTP Cap-binding assays
Cell extracts were incubated with 20 µL of
m7GTP-Sepharose CL4B beads (Pharmacia) at 4°C for 1 h and
then washed twice in BLB lysis buffer. Sepharose beads were resuspended
in Laemmli sample buffer with 2%
-ME and resolved on SDS-PAGE.
Flow cytometry
To determine DNA content and cell size, a Becton Dickinson FACS Calibur flow cytometer with Cell Quest software was used. For rat.1a cell size experiments, cells were seeded to 10-cm dishes at 5 × 105 cells/plate and transfected the next day with 2 µg of CD20 and 20 µg of plasmid to be assayed. Rat.1a cells were harvested for flow cytometry 48 h after removal of the CaPO4 precipitates.
For U2OS cell size experiments, cells were seeded to 60-mm dishes at 4 × 105 cells/plate, transfected the next day at ~80% confluency using 1 µg of CD20 plasmid and 10 µg of total plasmid to be assayed, and incubated overnight. Cells were then washed, trypsinized, replated to 10-cm dishes (1:4 split), and harvested 72 h after removal of the transfection complexes for analysis by flow cytometry. To harvest cells, plates were washed once with PBS, once quickly with PBS/EDTA (2.5 mM), and then incubated at 37°C for 5 min in 3 mL of PBS/EDTA. Cells were gently pipetted off the plates, transferred to 15-mL conical tubes, centrifuged for 5 min at 1000 rpm, and the cell pellets were incubated in 20 µL of anti-CD20-FITC monoclonal antibodies for 30 min on ice. The cells were then washed once in PBS containing 1% FBS, centrifuged, resuspended in 0.5 mL of PBS, and fixed by adding 5 mL of 88% ethanol (80% final). Fixed cells were stored at 4°C until the time of analysis. Immediately before analysis on the flow cytometer, the fixed cells were centrifuged at 1600 rpm for 5 min, washed once with PBS/1% FBS, and then incubated at 37°C for 30 min in propidium iodide/RNase A solution (10 µg/mL propidium iodide in 0.76 mM sodium citrate at pH 7.0; 250 µg/mL RNase A in 10 mM Tris-HCl, 15 mM NaCl at pH 7.5) diluted into PBS/1% FBS. For FACS analysis of untransfected cells, 10,000 single cells were collected. Single cells were gated away from clumped cells using an FL2-width versus FL-2 area dot plot. To analyze the transfected cell population, 3000-5000 FITC+ single cells were collected, depending on transfection efficiency, and the mean FSC-H of the FITC+ G1-phase population was determined as a measure of relative cell size (~1000-1500 cells) of the transfected cell population.
Statistical analysis
Data are presented as the mean plus or minus the standard error. Statistical significance was determined by the Student's t-test (paired two sample for means; two-tails) using Microsoft Excel. P-values >0.05 are defined as not significant (NS) unless indicated otherwise.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We thank Robert Abraham for his generous donation of mTOR plasmids, Nahum Sonenberg for generously sharing the eIF4E and 4EBP1 plasmids, and Morris Birnbaum for generously providing the anti-phospo-S6 antibodies. We are grateful to Martin G. Myers, Jr., Marie Classon, and members of the Blenis lab, particularly Celeste Richardson, Leon Murphy, Angie Romanelli, Stefanie Schalm, Sue-Ann Woo, and Andy Tee, for helpful discussions and critical reading of the manuscript. D.C.F. was supported by NIH NRSA fellowship #F32 CA69808. S.S. was supported by a fellowship from the Jane Coffin Childs Memorial Fund for Medical Research.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 USC section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Received April 1, 2002; revised version accepted April 30, 2002.
3 Present address: Microbia, Inc., One Kendall Square, Building 1400W, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
4 Corresponding author.
E-MAIL john_blenis{at}hms.harvard.edu; FAX (617) 432-1144.
Article and publication are at http://www.genesdev.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gad.995802.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|