|
|
|
Vol. 16, No. 19, pp. 2566-2575, October 1, 2002
1 Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Utrecht University, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands; 2 Departmento de Bioquímica Médica, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 21941-590 Brasil
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In plant meristems, dividing cells interpret positional information and translate it into patterned cell differentiation. Here we report the molecular identification of the Arabidopsis HOBBIT gene that is required for cell division and cell differentiation in meristems. We show that it encodes a homolog of the CDC27 subunit of the anaphase-promoting complex (APC). HOBBIT partially complements a yeast nuc2/cdc27 mutant. Unlike other CDC27 homologs in Arabidopsis, its transcription is cell cycle regulated. Furthermore, hobbit mutants show a reduction in DR5 :: GUS auxin reporter gene expression and accumulate the AXR3/IAA17 repressor of auxin responses. HOBBIT activity may thus couple cell division to cell differentiation by regulating cell cycle progression in the meristem or by restricting the response to differentiation cues, such as auxin, to dividing cells.
[Key Words: APC3; auxin; BimA; meristem; Nuc2; pattern formation]
| |
Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Meristems of higher plants are postembryonic regions of
mitotic activity that continuously produce new cells
(Steeves and Sussex 1989
). These cells interpret positional cues for
fate decisions, and already in the mitotic zone they specifically
orient planes of cell division and acquire different shapes. Once
departed from the meristem, the cells expand and fully differentiate.
Thus, cell differentiation commences while cells are actively dividing and continues when mitotic activity ceases.
Cell cycle regulation in yeast and animals involves alternating phases
of high and low activity of cyclin-dependent kinases. The
anaphase-promoting complex (APC), a multisubunit ubiquitin ligase
triggering proteolytic destruction of mitotic cyclins, is an important
regulator of the low-activity phase (Zachariae and Nasmyth 1999
).
Plants contain cyclin-dependent kinases and associated factors, whose
roles have been studied by dominant-negative and ectopic expression
approaches (Hemerly et al. 1995
; Doerner et al. 1996
; Cockcroft et al.
2000
). Furthermore, a proteolytic pathway acts in cyclin degradation,
and a potential regulatory factor of the APC has been described
(Cebolla et al. 1999
; Criqui et al. 2000
). Thus, plants appear to
contain conserved regulatory components of the cell cycle, but there is
limited knowledge on how cell cycle controls are integrated with the
cell differentiation program in meristems.
Mutations in the Arabidopsis thaliana HOBBIT (HBT)
gene interfere with postembryonic cell division and with the
differentiation of the distally located quiescent center (QC),
columella root cap, and lateral root cap cells (Willemsen et al. 1998
).
The differentiation of these three cell types, furthermore, depends on
distal accumulation of the plant hormone auxin, and high auxin levels
can promote their differentiation in more proximal regions; this
response, however, is restricted to actively dividing cells (Sabatini
et al. 1999
). The earliest detected defect in hbt mutants is
misorientation of the plane of cell division in a progenitor cell of
distal root cell types. Similar early defects occur in the
auxin-resistant mutants bodenlos (bdl) and auxin
resistant6 (axr6; Hamann et al. 1999
; Hobbie et al. 2000
)
and in plants mutant for the MONOPTEROS (MP) gene,
encoding a transcription factor that binds to auxin-responsive promoter
elements (Hardtke and Berleth 1998
).
We report here that the HBT gene is required for progression of cell differentiation rather than for pattern formation and that it encodes a protein homologous to CDC27/Nuc2, a component of the anaphase-promoting complex (APC). HBT can partially complement cell division defects in a Schizosaccharomyces pombe nuc2 mutant, and the HBT transcript accumulates in a punctuate cell cycle-dependent pattern, linking HBT gene activity to the cell cycle. We further show accumulation of an Aux/IAA auxin-response transcriptional repressor in hbt mutants, suggesting that HBT gene activity can control, directly or indirectly, auxin-mediated cell division and differentiation responses.
| |
Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
hobbit mutants are defective in progression of cell differentiation in root and shoot meristems
Studies on a series of EMS-induced recessive alleles previously
established that the HBT gene is required for correct
orientation of embryonic cell divisions in the embryonic root
primordium and for maintenance of cell division and cell
differentiation in the postembryonic root meristem (Willemsen et al.
1998
). The spatial correlation of the early and late defects suggested
that the gene might be required for root primordium specification
during early pattern formation. However, analysis of markers expressed
in the root primordium at different stages of embryogenesis revealed no
significant differences between hbt and wild-type embryos. The
suspensor and hypophyseal cell marker 267-1 is expressed in wild-type
and hbt hypophyseal cells at the globular stage, when the
first cell division defects become apparent in hbt mutant embryos (Fig. 1A,B). SCARECROW
(SCR) gene expression was detected using promoter fusions and
in situ hybridization, at the early heart stage in the incipient
quiescent center of wild-type embryos and the equivalent position in
hbt embryos, and later in the ground tissue (Fig. 1C-F; data
not shown). After embryogenesis, SCR expression was reduced in
the ground tissue of hbt mutants and reduced or absent at the
position corresponding to the QC (Fig. 1G,H). Enhancer trap J1092,
marking the lateral root cap and to a lesser extent the central root
cap in wild-type embryos from the torpedo stage onward, is also
distally expressed in hbt embryos until the mature embryo
stage (Fig. 1I,J). J1092 expression marks the same root cap domain in
wild-type seedlings but is absent in postembryonic root cells of
hbt mutants (data not shown).
|
Although the embryonic shoot apical meristem (SAM) does form in
hbt mutants, its postembryonic development is defective
(Willemsen et al. 1998
). Closer inspection reveals that cell division
ceases after an initial proliferation phase, and epidermal cells of
leaf primordia and cotyledons become irregular in shape (Fig. 1K,L). Furthermore, whereas the wild-type SAM and leaf primordia display regular anticlinal cell division patterns in the outer layers (Fig.
1M), hbt mutants display unordered divisions in these layers (Fig. 1N, arrow) and give rise to vacuolated cells that do not differentiate appropriately. A reporter driven by the promoter of the
KNAT2 homeobox gene marks the SAM in wild-type and
hbt embryos (data not shown), continues to be expressed in
wild-type, but disappears in the vacuolated cells at the position of
the hbt SAM (Fig. 1O,P).
Our results indicate that root and shoot meristem primordia are appropriately patterned in hbt embryos, but that postembryonic progression of differentiation of meristematic cell types and maintenance of gene expression patterns is affected. Cells in the SAM have a limited capacity to divide postembryonically, but ultimately cell division ceases in both meristems.
HOBBIT encodes a CDC27/Nuc2 homolog that partially complements cell division defects in S. pombe nuc2 mutants
To analyze the molecular basis of the requirement of HBT
for cell division and progression of cell differentiation in both root
and shoot meristems, we cloned the gene using a map-based approach.
Fine mapping located the HBT gene on Chromosome 2 in an area
of 120 kb between CAPS markers F6F22/64 and T2G17/34 on the overlapping
BACs F6F22 and T2G17 (Fig. 2A). We
amplified and sequenced genomic DNA of the hbt2311
and hbt9620 alleles spanning 30 annotated open
reading frames (ORFs; Lin et al. 1999
), and identified point mutations
only in ORF T2G17.20. Eight more hbt alleles revealed sequence
changes in the same ORF (Table 1). A 9.2-kb
genomic fragment spanning the HBT locus and containing no
other predicted ORFs fully complemented hbt2311
homozygotes (data not shown). We conclude that this transcription unit
represents the HBT gene.
|
|
HBT cDNAs were isolated from a cDNA library and by RT-PCR.
Comparison of the genomic and cDNA sequences revealed that the HBT gene contains 15 exons and 14 introns (Fig. 2A). RNase
protection analysis showed two transcriptional start sites (Fig. 2B),
both with putative upstream TATA and CAAT boxes. Northern blot analysis confirmed the 2.5-kb size of the transcript (Fig. 2B). The predicted HBT protein of 744 residues contains 10 tetratrico peptide repeats (TPRs; Fig. 2C,D), thought to be involved in protein-protein
interactions (Lamb et al. 1995
). The HBT protein has the highest
homology to the CDC27/BimA/Nuc2 class of proteins found in such
evolutionarily distant organisms as yeast, insects, and mammals (Fig.
2D). These proteins are components of the APC, involved in the control
of cell cycle progression (King et al. 1995
; Zachariae and Nasmyth 1999
).
To investigate whether the Arabidopsis HBT protein can act as a component of the APC, the full-size cDNA was cloned in a yeast vector with a thiamine-repressible promoter and transformed into an S. pombe nuc2ts strain. HBT expression partially rescued the nuc2 phenotype at the restrictive temperature, reproducibly restoring growth to approximately fourfold higher density compared with the empty vector control. Complementation was not complete as growth rates and final density were, respectively, 5- and 10-fold less compared with the permissive temperature (Fig. 2E). We concluded that HBT protein can restore defects in its homologous yeast APC component and hence may act as a component of the plant APC.
Mutations in the hbt9620,
hbt5721, and hbt2311 alleles
introduce premature stop codons and should result in truncated proteins
lacking major portions of the TPR domains (Table 1). In S. pombe, constructs carrying versions of the Nuc2 protein with
truncations in the TPR domains cannot complement nuc2-663,
which has no detectable Nuc2 function (Hirano et al. 1988
, 1990
). Thus,
the presumptive absence of many TPR domains in three strong
hbt alleles suggests that these alleles may be nulls.
Notably, a second CDC27-related sequence is present in the Arabidopsis genome, whose homology to yeast CDC27/Nuc2 is comparable to that of HBT (36% vs. 32%). The deduced AtCDC27a protein (accession no. BAB01271) shares an overall similarity of 47% with HBT, which increases to 65% when comparing the TPR domains. On the contrary, AtCDC16 and AtCDC23 homologs, encoding two other putative components of the APC with TPR domains, are present as single-copy genes in the Arabidopsis genome and group in distinct clades (Fig. 2D). An insertion in the AtCDC16 gene has been expected to lead to gametophytic lethality (V. Sundaresan, pers. comm.). However, phenotypes that point to an early essential role of the HBT protein in the APC complex, that is, metaphase arrest and gametophytic lethality, are not observed in the strong hbt alleles. This lack of early cell division arrest in hbt mutants may be explained by redundancy with AtCDC27a or by a divergence of HBT gene function from an ancestral role in the APC.
HBT gene expression is cell cycle regulated
We analyzed whether redundant gene action and differences in
transcription of the HBT and AtCDC27a genes could
explain the region-specific mitotic defects in hbt mutants. On
Northern blots, HBT transcripts were detected at similar
levels in all organs tested (Fig. 2B). Antisense probes corresponding
to unique 5' sequences were used for in situ hybridization experiments.
The distribution of HBT transcript varies during different
stages of embryogenesis and also among cells within one embryo (Fig. 3A-D). HBT expression remains low
in all cells until early heart stage onward, where particular cells
express the gene at higher levels than others. The stochastic and
punctuate distribution of these cells with higher HBT mRNA
levels suggested that expression is elevated in a specific phase of the
cell cycle. Colocalization of HBT and AtCYCB2;2
transcripts (Mironov et al. 1999
) on single sections of late-stage
embryos revealed high HBT transcript accumulation in the same
cells that accumulate AtCYCB2;2 message, thus showing that the
HBT message is cell cycle regulated with a peak around the
G2/M phase (Fig. 3G-I). AtCDC27a is expressed
ubiquitously at high levels during all embryonic stages (Fig. 3J-L),
and this expression pattern contrasts with the low and punctuate
expression pattern of HBT. AtCDC23 and
AtCDC16 display similar high and ubiquitous transcript levels
in the embryo (data not shown).
|
HBT again showed a punctuate expression in the actively dividing cells of the postembryonic root meristem (Fig. 3M-O), shoot meristem, flowers, and lateral root initiation sites (data not shown). In contrast, AtCDC27a (Fig. 3P-R), AtCDC23, and AtCDC16 (data not shown) transcript levels are uniformly high in all dividing cells. In lines segregating for the strong hbt2311 allele, no obvious difference in the expression level or pattern between wild-type (WT) and mutant embryos was observed (Fig. 3D,E). This indicated that HBT function is not required for the regulation of its own expression and, taking HBT expression as a marker of the G2/M phase, it also suggested that no dramatic cell cycle phasing defects occur in hbt embryos. As HBT mRNA was always detected in a subset of AtCDC27a-transcribing cells, the late cell division block in hbt appears not to be caused by the postembryonic absence of AtCDC27a transcription in the HBT expression domain. Rather, the distinct expression pattern of HBT in comparison to all other TPR-containing APC subunit homologs tested suggests that the gene serves a specialized function in meristematic cells.
hobbit mutants lack distal auxin reporter gene expression and accumulate a repressor of auxin responses
Several auxin-related cell division and cell differentiation
processes appear to be affected in the root of hbt seedlings. Furthermore, hbt cotyledons display vascular patterning
defects similar to those observed in axr6, bdl, and
mp mutants (Fig. 4A,B; Hardtke and
Berleth 1998
; Hamann et al. 1999
; Hobbie et al. 2000
). Moreover,
dark-grown hbt seedlings fail to maintain an apical hook as do
the auxin-response mutants axr1, tir1, and
bdl (Fig. 4C). This prompted us to investigate whether the
HBT gene was required for auxin responses. A root growth assay
revealed that growth of wild-type and the axr1-3
auxin-response mutant was inhibited from 0.1 µM IAA onward (Fig. 4D).
The limited growth of the root of the weak hbt1611
allele was stimulated at IAA concentrations that already inhibited growth of wild type (Fig. E) and, to a lesser extent, the
axr1-3 mutant. Notably, root growth stimulation also occurs in
wild-type plants, but at very low IAA concentrations (Evans et al.
1994
; data not shown). Only high concentrations acted as inhibitory on
hbt suggesting that hbt seedlings displayed a shifted
biphasic response to IAA that indicates a lower sensitivity (Fig. 4E). To investigate further the auxin responsiveness of hbt
seedlings, we used a synthetic auxin-responsive promoter,
DR5 :: GUS (Ulmasov et al. 1997
).
hbt2311 embryos displayed a basal
DR5 :: GUS maximum after heart stage similar to that of wild-type embryos, and hence the basal auxin transport and response machinery appears to be active (Fig. 4F,G). hbt2311 seedlings, however, lack the
DR5 :: GUS maximum that is present in the columella of wild-type roots (Fig. 4H,I). After growing wild-type and hbt seedlings for 3 d on media containing
5 × 10
7 M the synthetic auxin 2,4-D, intense ectopic
DR5 :: GUS expression was detected
in the wild-type root (data not shown), and a basal DR5 :: GUS peak appeared in the
hbt root pole (Fig. 4J), suggesting that the signal
transduction machinery to perceive auxin in the root tip is still
present at the appropriate location in hbt mutants but less
active.
|
Auxin-responsive transcription factors that activate
DR5 :: GUS can dimerize with
short-lived repressor proteins of the Aux/IAA class, encoded by early
auxin-response genes, which reduce auxin responses (Kim et al. 1997
;
Ulmasov et al. 1997
). Dominant mutations in several Aux/IAA
genes stabilize the protein and reduce auxin sensitivity (e.g., Rouse
et al. 1998
; Ouellet et al. 2001
). The axr3-1 mutant carries
such a dominant mutation in the IAA17/AXR3 protein, and axr3-1
roots have reduced DR5 :: GUS
responses and lack properly differentiated distal cell types (Sabatini
et al. 1999
). The axr3-1 mutant defect in the root tip
reminded us of the stronger but similar defects in hbt
mutants. Moreover, the possibility that HBT functioned in an APC-like
complex that targets proteins for degradation prompted us to
investigate whether IAA17/AXR3 turnover could depend on HBT activity.
Polyclonal antibodies raised against IAA17/AXR3 do not detect a
candidate protein in wild type because of the low abundance of AXR3
(Ouellet et al. 2001
), but detected a prominent band close to the
expected size in protein extracts of different hbt alleles (Fig. 5A). This band was markedly reduced
in double mutants of hbt2311 and the GT3958 gene
trap (Fig. 5B), which we determined by PCR to be homozygous for a Ds
transposon insertion that upon sequence analysis appeared to reside 130 bp downstream of the start codon in the first exon of
IAA17/AXR3 (data not shown). We concluded that the antiserum
predominantly detected IAA17/AXR3 protein that accumulates to high
levels in hbt seedlings. However, signals of lower intensity
accumulate at a molecular weight in the range of the AUX/IAA proteins
in hbt iaa17/axr3GT3958 seedlings, which may be
caused by IAA17/AXR3-related proteins (Fig. 5B, arrowhead). RT-PCR
experiments revealed that AXR3 RNA is less abundant in
hbt2311 seedlings compared with wild-type seedlings
(Fig. 5C), strongly suggesting that the observed protein
accumulation is caused by defective posttranscriptional regulation.
Posttranscriptional regulation was not generally defective in
hbt as we detected wild-type levels of the proteolytically
regulated HY5 protein (Fig. 5D; Osterlund et al. 2000
).
|
Although the accumulation of IAA17/AXR3 repressor protein in hbt mutants correlates with the observation that auxin responses are reduced, the hbt root phenotype was not suppressed in the hbt2311 iaa17/axr3GT3958 double mutant (data not shown). Taking into account the residual signals detected by the Aux/IAA antibody in this double mutant, this may be caused by additional Aux/IAA proteins in hbt mutants.
| |
Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have shown that the HBT gene is required in meristems
for postembryonic progression of cell differentiation and maintenance of cell division. The gene encodes a protein homologous to the CDC27/Nuc2/BimA/APC3 subunit of the APC, which regulates M-phase progression in yeast and animals through targeted proteolysis. In line
with a cell cycle-related role, HBT protein can partially complement an
S. pombe nuc2 mutant, and HBT transcripts mainly accumulate around the G2/M phase in dividing cells. In
contrast with mutants in other plant APC homologs, presumptive
hbt null mutants are not defective in cell cycle progression
during gametophyte development and embryogenesis. Arrest of cell
division occurs only at later stages in root and shoot meristems, in
both cases associated with aberrant progression of cell
differentiation. The defects in auxin-requiring cell types in the
hbt root meristem correlate with low auxin sensitivity, and we
have obtained evidence that the Aux/IAA proteins may be one class of
factors regulated by HBT. This raises the possibility that cell
division or cell differentiation defects in hbt mutants arise
from differences in auxin responsiveness. It should be interesting to
establish whether AUX/IAA proteins are direct targets of a
HBT-containing APC-like complex or whether HBT indirectly affects
AUX/IAA abundance by modulation of the activity of other factors, for
example, the SCFtir1 complex that targets Aux/IAA proteins
for destruction (Gray et al. 2001
).
The requirements for HBT activity in postembryonic cell division and cell differentiation may be independent, but they can also be connected, and below we discuss possible causal relationships.
HOBBIT as cell cycle regulator
Our findings pose the question whether, in line with its molecular identity and expression pattern, the HBT gene is required primarily for cell cycle regulation. In this case, redundant gene action, for example, by AtCDC27a, of which we detected high transcript levels throughout the embryo, should explain the normal cell division rate in hbt embryos. In postembryonic meristems, higher levels of HBT may be required at a specific phase of the cell cycle, for which AtCDC27a activity can no longer substitute.
Several mechanisms can be proposed by which cell differentiation defects arise from cell cycle progression defects. First, it is possible that the cell types that do not appropriately differentiate in hbt cannot achieve appropriate ploidy levels. However, we consider this unlikely as flow cytometry experiments indicate that hbt nuclei can perform at least three endoreduplication cycles (data not shown).
A second possibility is that progression through a specific phase of
the cell cycle may be required for appropriate cell differentiation. For example, defined Drosophila neurons are specified by the
even-skipped transcription factor, whose expression depends
on progression through S phase, presumably for temporary removal of
chromatin-remodeling factors that inhibit even-skipped
expression (Weigmann and Lehner 1995
). In analogy, an
hbt-mediated cell cycle block in meristems could prevent the
occurrence of the appropriate cell cycle phase for activation of cell
differentiation factors. Similarly, an inappropriate elevation of
mitotic cyclin levels in hbt, normally not associated with the
G1 phase, could prevent cell cycle exit and differentiation.
It is noteworthy in this respect that APC activity has been reported to
remain active in differentiated animal cells (Gieffers et al. 1999
).
When appropriate antibodies become available, this hypothesis can be
tested by the analysis of mitotic cyclin levels in hbt mutants.
HOBBIT as a regulator of cell differentiation
The HBT gene may have acquired new functions in the
regulation of cell differentiation. Diverse roles for the APC have
recently been suggested, because mutations in APC components disrupt
zygote polarity in Caenorhabditis elegans (Rappleye et al.
2002
). Here, identical genes are involved in both polarity and cell
cycle progression, and the known APC target separin is required for
both processes. Notably, HBT is the only TPR-containing APC homolog in
the Arabidopsis genome of which a related copy exists. Hence,
it is conceivable that the HBT gene encodes a duplicated APC
subunit with new functions. The characterization of SCF
ubiquitin-protein ligase complexes provides clear precedence for such
a functional diversification of factors originally identified as cell
cycle regulators (Patton et al. 1998
).
The cell division defects in hbt meristems may be a
consequence of defective cell differentiation if HBT-dependent upstream factors in the meristems control mitotic activity. Clear examples of
regional cell cycle regulation have emerged from studies in Drosophila, where many transcription factors have been shown
to act upstream of cell cycle control through regulation of the CDK phosphatase encoded by string(cdc25) (Edgar et al. 1994
).
How can HBT cell cycle-specific transcription fit into the regulation-of-differentiation scenario? One possibility is that this cell cycle-specific transcription links cell cycle progression to control of cell differentiation in the meristem. In the meristem, cell differentiation is reversible and continuously dependent on positional cues. HBT-mediated, cell cycle-regulated abundance of response factors, for example, Aux/IAA proteins, may create a window of perception for cell differentiation cues in plant meristems.
Interestingly, cell cycle-regulated modulation of the perception of
positional cues has been documented in C. elegans. The competence of vulval precursor cells to respond to signals that select
vulval cell fates is coupled to different phases of the cell cycle
(Ambros 1999
; Wang and Sternberg 1999
). The LIN-12 transmembrane
receptor is required for this selection. LIN-12 activity appears to be
modulated at the end of the G1 phase by SEL-10, an SCF
component regulating ubiquitin-mediated turnover (Hubbard et al. 1997
).
Although it remains to be shown how direct and functionally important the control of Aux/IAA levels by HBT is, a dependence of abundance of these proteins on cell cycle-expressed HBT activity seems to be an attractive explanation for the restriction of multiple auxin-mediated responses to dividing cells.
| |
Materials and methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Plant stocks
The hbt alleles were described in Willemsen et al. (1998)
.
Suspensor-expressed promoter trap 267-1 was provided by P. Gallois; pSCR :: GUS by P. Benfey (Wysocka-Diller et al. 2000
); and J1092 by J. Haseloff
(http://www.plantsci.cam.ac.uk/haseloff/CATALOGUES/Jlines/index.html). The axr3 GT3958 gene trap (L-er background) was
obtained from the Nottingham Arabidopsis Stock Centre database
(http://nasc.nott.ac.uk; stock number N 100023; an IMA line provided by
V. Sundaresan). All plants were grown on 1/2 GM (Scheres et al. 1994
).
The DR5 :: GUS plants have been
described previously (Sabatini et al. 1999
).
Auxin-response experiments
For apical hook experiments, seedlings were grown in the dark as
described in Hamann et al. (1999)
. For auxin-sensitivity assays,
wild-type (Col-0 and L-er) plants and axr1 and
hbt1611 mutants were grown as described above for 3 d, transferred to fresh plates containing different IAA concentrations
(10
7-10
3 M), and the root length from the tip
to the hypocotyl boundary was measured.
Microscopy
Plant material for light microscopy was prepared as described in
Scheres et al. (1994)
. Images were taken on a Zeiss Axioskop 2 microscope with a Nikon DXM1200 digital camera. For scanning electron
microscopy, tissues were prepared as in Bowman et al. (1989)
and
visualized on a Philips XL30Labs SEM.
Map-based cloning
Heterozygotes carrying the Col-0 allele hbt2311
were crossed to L-er stichel, with sti (II,8) and
er (II,48) flanking the HBT gene. In the
F2 generation, recombinants between sti and
er were selected. To identify hbt heterozygotes among
these recombinants, F3 progenies were tested for
hbt segregation, and DNA was isolated from 204 recombinants
between sti and hbt and 78 recombinants between
er and hbt, using a CTAB method (Lukowitz et al.
1996
). DNA was analyzed with previously described CAPS markers
(http://www.arabidopsis.org; Konieczny and Ausubel 1993
). ORFs in the
interval between the two nearest flanking markers were PCR-amplified
from hbt2311 and hbt9620, and
sequenced using Big Dye Terminator (Genpak Ltd.) on an ABI PRISM 310 Genetic Analyzer. Among all these ORFs, only ORFT2G17.20 contained
mutations, and the sequence of all hbt alleles revealed the
presence of mutations. Thus, 9.2 kb of genomic DNA containing this ORF
(position 13960-23244 of T2G17 BAC) were cloned in the vector
pgreen0226, conjugated into Agrobacterium tumefaciens C58, and
this strain was used to transform hbt2311/+ plants.
Resistant plants were genotyped for the hbt2311
mutations using an allele-specific CAPS marker (see below), and complemented plants with wild-type appearance but homozygous for hbt2311 were identified.
RNase protection analysis
The HBT transcription start was determined using RNAse protection on 20 µg of total RNA from roots and cotyledons and 1 µg of poly(A) RNA from seedlings. A 350-bp HBT DNA fragment including the putative ATG transcription start was subcloned into a PGEM-T vector (Promega). The RNAse protection experiment was carried out using the Ambion RPA II RNAse protection kit, according to the manufacturer's instructions.
RNA expression analysis
For Northern blot analysis, total RNA from different tissues was
isolated (Kay et al. 1987
), fractionated in 1% denaturing gels, and
transferred to a Hybond-N Nylon membrane (Amersham) as described in
Sambrook et al. (1989)
. Hybridizations were performed at 65°C using
the 350-bp probe from the RNAse protection assay. The integrity and
equal loading of the RNAs were checked by staining the blot with
methylene blue (Sambrook et al. 1989
).
For the in situ hybridization experiments, tissues were fixed,
dehydrated, and embedded as described in Wilkinson and Nieto (1993)
.
Pretreatment and hybridization were performed according to the method
of Lincoln et al. (1994)
. Hybridizations and washes were carried out
under stringent conditions (2× SSC, 50% formamide at 65°C). Double
labelings were performed according to Long and Barton (1998)
.
AtCYCB2;2 antisense was labeled with digoxigenin-11-UTP. Fluorescein-12-UTP was used for HBT antisense and sense probes synthesis. AtCYCB2;2 was detected with anti-digoxigenin
antibody (1:1250) and fast red substrate (Sigma), and HBT
with anti-fluorescein antibody (1:6000) and NBT/BCIP substrate (Roche).
Yeast complementation
The coding region from HBT cDNA was amplified using the
Elongase Amplification System (Life Technologies) and cloned into pGEM-T (Promega). A 2.4-kb SalI-BamHI fragment was
transcriptionally fused to the thiamine-repressible promoter
(nmt1) in the yeast shuttle vector pREP3, containing the LEU2
selection marker, and transformed into S. pombe strain
nuc2-663 (Hirano et al. 1988
) as described in Moreno et al.
(1991)
. Leu+ colonies were grown in liquid minimal media (MM)
with 5 µM thiamine at 25°C overnight. Cells were washed in MM
without thiamine, divided in two flasks, and grown at 25°C to induce
the promoter. One flask was shifted to 37°C, the other kept at
25°C, and optical density at 700 nm was measured from samples taken
at 2-h intervals.
Genotyping of mutant combinations
The hbt2311 mutations were identified using allele-specific CAPS markers. PCR reactions were carried out using the following primers: HBT-F, GAGTTACTTGGCAGGAACTAATA TCAAC; HBT-R, CATAGCACACCTACATAATTGATTGCT TAT. PCR products were digested with the restriction enzyme MnlI (MBI Fermentas). The primers used for AXR3 wild-type allele genotyping were AXR3-F, TCTTCCCGGTGGAGATA CAG; and AXR3-R, GCCCATGGTAAAAGAGCTGA; and for Ds insertion allele: DS3-1, CGATTACCGTATTTATCCCGT; and AXR3-R.
Western blot analysis
Crude protein extract was produced from whole seedlings using the
EZ method as described in Martinez-Garcia et al. (1999)
. Total proteins
were quantified using DC reagent (Bio-Rad). Then 1 µg of extract was separated on a 15% polyacrylamide gel and transferred onto Immobilon-P membranes following the manufacturer's instructions (Millipore). Membranes were blocked and incubated with
either anti-AXR3/IAA17 (1/500; Ouellet et al. 2001
) or anti-HY5 (1/750;
Osterlund et al. 2000
) purified antibodies. Secondary anti-rabbit IgG
conjugated to HRP (1/5000; Bio-Rad) was used, and blots were revealed
using an ECL detection kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Membranes were
then incubated with anti-actin IgG (1/3000; ICN Pharmaceuticals Inc.)
and anti-mouse IgG conjugated to HRP (1/5000; Bio-Rad), following the
same procedure.
Accession numbers
The cDNA sequence for HOBBIT was submitted to GenBank under accession no. AJ487669.
| |
Acknowledgments |
|---|
We are grateful to Philip Benfey, Patrick Gallois, and Jim Haseloff for making available promotor fusions/traps and enhancer traps, to Sakis Theologis for making available the AXR3/IAA17 antibody, to Xing Wang Deng and Christian Hardtke for the HY5 antibody, and to Thorsten Hamann for the bodenlos seeds. Frits Kindt and Piet Brouwers are acknowledged for help in preparing the figures. We also thank the members of the Scheres laboratory for the useful comments on the manuscript. F.F. and O.S. have been supported by EC-MCF fellowships HPMF-CT-1999-00013 and HPMF-CT-2001-01349. The Dutch organization of Sciences has supported B.S by Jonge Chemici and Pionier grants and S.F. by an ALW grant. N.E. and P.F. acknowledge CNPq and CAPES for support.
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 USC section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| |
Footnotes |
|---|
Received May 24, 2002; revised version accepted July 31, 2002.
3 These authors contributed equally to this work.
4 Corresponding author.
E-MAIL b.scheres{at}bio.uu.nl; FAX 31-30-251-3655
Article and publication are at http://www.genesdev.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gad.237302.
| |
References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The nexus.
Plant Cell
11:
509-522This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W.D. Teale, F.A. Ditengou, A.D. Dovzhenko, X. Li, A.M. Molendijk, B. Ruperti, I. Paponov, and K. Palme Auxin as a Model for the Integration of Hormonal Signal Processing and Transduction Mol Plant, March 1, 2008; 1(2): 229 - 237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Shishkova, T. L. Rost, and J. G. Dubrovsky Determinate Root Growth and Meristem Maintenance in Angiosperms Ann. Bot., February 1, 2008; 101(3): 319 - 340. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Ohashi-Ito and D. C. Bergmann Regulation of the Arabidopsis root vascular initial population by LONESOME HIGHWAY Development, August 15, 2007; 134(16): 2959 - 2968. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Dreher and J. Callis Ubiquitin, Hormones and Biotic Stress in Plants Ann. Bot., May 1, 2007; 99(5): 787 - 822. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. R. Thornton and D. P. Toczyski Precise destruction: an emerging picture of the APC. Genes & Dev., November 15, 2006; 20(22): 3069 - 3078. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Serralbo, J. M. Perez-Perez, R. Heidstra, and B. Scheres Non-cell-autonomous rescue of anaphase-promoting complex function revealed by mosaic analysis of HOBBIT, an Arabidopsis CDC27 homolog PNAS, August 29, 2006; 103(35): 13250 - 13255. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. D. Jenik, R. E.J. Jurkuta, and M. K. Barton Interactions between the Cell Cycle and Embryonic Patterning in Arabidopsis Uncovered by a Mutation in DNA Polymerase {varepsilon} PLANT CELL, December 1, 2005; 17(12): 3362 - 3377. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||