![[Feedback]](/icons/banner/feedbackACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[For Subscribers]](/icons/banner/subscriberACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Archive]](/icons/banner/archiveACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Search]](/icons/banner/searchACT.gif){kind=icon}
![[Contents]](/icons/banner/tocACT.gif){kind=icon}
|
|
|
|
|
||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RESEARCH PAPER
Marie Curie Research Institute (MCRI), The Chart, Oxted, Surrey RH8 0TL, UK
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract ResultsDiscussionMaterials and methodsAcknowledgmentsReferences |
|---|
[Keywords: DNA modification; imprint; replication pausing; mating-type switching; Schizosaccharomyces pombe]
Received October 25, 2003; revised version accepted February 27, 2004.
; for review, see Haber 1998). In B and T cells, V(D)J recombination is initiated by DSBs, introduced in the target DNA sequence by RAG1 and RAG2 proteins (McBlane et al. 1995; for review, see Gellert 2002). The combined action of the cytidine deaminase and uracil-DNA glycosylase is thought to generate abasic sites, leading to class switch recombination in B cells (Di Noia and Neuberger 2002; Rada et al. 2002). Here we show that S. pombe relies on RNase-sensitive modifications in the DNA double helix for the initiation of the replication-coupled recombination event that leads to mating-type switching in this yeast.
The S. pombe mating-type region consists of three gene cassettes, mat1, mat2P, and mat3M, each flanked by the homology boxes H1 and H2 (Fig. 1A). The donor loci mat2P and mat3M, containing P or M information, respectively, are transcriptionally silenced (Kelly et al. 1988). The mat1, which contains either P or M information, is transcriptionally active and determines the mating type of the cell. Switching between mating types occurs via a recombination event between mat1M and mat2P or mat1P and mat3M cassettes, which replaces the information at mat1 with the information of the opposite mating type (Fig. 1A; Beach 1983; Beach and Klar 1984; Arcangioli and de Lahondes 2000; for review, see Dalgaard and Klar 2001b).
|
). Switchable cells carry a strand-specific imprint at the mat1 (Egel and Eie 1987; Klar 1987; Klar and Bonaduce 1993). Later studies showed that the imprint is converted into a DSB during standard methods of DNA purification (Arcangioli 1998; Dalgaard and Klar 1999). This break was mapped to a position close to the border of the homology domain H1 within the mat1 cassette on the strand, which contains the imprint (Fig. 1B; Nielsen and Egel 1989). The imprint was characterized either as an alkali-labile modification (Dalgaard and Klar 1999) or a nick (Arcangioli 1998). Genetic experiments show that imprinting occurs only when mat1 is replicated in a centromere-proximal direction (Fig. 1C; Dalgaard and Klar 1999, 2000, 2001a). A polar terminator of replication, RTS1, is located proximal to mat1 (Fig. 1C). This element ensures, by direction-specific replication termination, that the mat1 locus is always replicated in the correct orientation for the imprinting and mating-type switching (Dalgaard and Klar 2000, 2001a).
We previously proposed a model, termed the direction-of-replication model, which explains the switching pattern of S. pombe (Dalgaard and Klar 1999; line drawing, Fig. 1B). The mat1 locus is replicated by a distal origin, and the imprint is made only in the sister chromatid replicated as the lagging strand. The imprint is maintained in the DNA during the cell cycle until the next S-phase, when the imprinted strand is a template for leading-strand replication. There, it is thought that the replication fork encounters the modification and a DSB is formed for the initiation of the DNA recombination event, leading to mating-type switching (Dalgaard and Klar 2001b).
Imprinting depends on the trans-acting factors swi1, swi3, and swi7 (Egel et al. 1984). 2D-gel analysis of replication intermediates detects a pause of the replication fork in the proximity of the mat1 imprint. Interestingly, trans-acting factors swi1 and swi3 are required for this replication pause (Dalgaard and Klar 2000). swi1p is a homolog of S. cerevisiae Tof1p and TIM1/Timeless proteins in higher eukaryotes (Park and Sternglanz 1999; Lakin-Thomas 2000). Tof1p and swi1p have been implicated in MEC1- and cds1-dependent replication checkpoints in S. cerevisiae and S. pombe, respectively (Foss 2001; Noguchi et al. 2003). In addition, increased recombination is observed at hydroxyurea-stalled replication forks in swi1 mutants (Noguchi et al. 2003). The identification of swi3 gene has not yet been published. Importantly, swi7 was shown to be polymerase 
which is predominantly involved in lagging-strand replication (Singh and Klar 1993). In addition, two cis-acting sequences, SAS1 and SAS2, which are located distal to mat1 (Fig. 1A), are essential for imprinting. SAS1 and SAS2 are thought to play a role in maintenance of the imprint (Arcangioli and Klar 1991). The DNA-binding protein sap1p was shown to bind to SAS1 and SAS2 in vitro (Arcangioli and Klar 1991). A 263-bp deletion, named smt-0 (Figs. 1A, 3A, below), has been identified. This deletion removes SAS1 and SAS2 and abolishes the imprint and switching (Styrkarsdottir et al. 1993). Interestingly, neither the swi7 nor the smt-0 mutations affect replication pausing at mat1 (Dalgaard and Klar 2000). Thus, replication pausing at mat1 is necessary but not sufficient for the formation and/or the maintenance of the imprint.
|
On the basis of these and previous observations, we propose the following additions to our earlier model for the mechanism of the imprinting: (1) The leading-strand replication complex replicates past the site of imprinting; (2) lagging-strand synthesis of the Okazaki fragment that is going to span over the site of the imprint is initiated at this proximal priming site; (3) a swi1p- and swi3p-dependent signal during lagging-strand elongation causes pausing of the leading-strand replication; and (4) the imprint is formed either via incorporation of the ribonucleotides during polymerization, or postreplicatively by an oxidation of the DNA backbone.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractResultsDiscussionMaterials and methodsAcknowledgmentsReferences |
|---|
Mating-type switching has been proposed to initiate when the leading-strand replication complex encounters the imprint in the template strand (Arcangioli and de Lahondes 2000; Dalgaard and Klar 2001b; Fig. 1B, brackets). We analyzed the progression of the leading strand through the site of the imprint by applying to replication intermediates a high-resolution Southern blot technique (Nielsen and Egel 1989). The replication and switching intermediates were purified (Huberman et al. 1987) from JZ105 (wild-type mat1M) and SV1 (swi3) strains, each containing a deletion of the donor loci mat2P and mat3M. The deletion of mat2 and mat3 prevents the sequence homology at the donor cassettes from interfering with the analysis. In strains deleted for donor loci, the imprint at mat1 is still formed, but it is thought that instead of switching, homologous recombination occurs with the sister chromatid (Klar and Miglio 1986). In this experiment, the swi3 mutant strain acts as a control, as it lacks the mat1 imprint and therefore any switching-related intermediates. Replication intermediates were digested with SspI, purified from nonreplicating DNA by using benzoylated naphthoylated DEAE (BND) cellulose (Kiger and Sinsheimer 1969), and separated on a polyacrylamide gel. After subsequent electrotransfer, the filter was hybridized to the strand-specific probe that detects the lower strand. Using this technique, we mapped the 3'-end of the leading strand, formed when the replication fork encounters the imprint (Figs. 1B, 2B), exactly to the position where the imprint/break had been mapped on the other strand (Fig. 2A; Nielsen and Egel 1989). This result indicates that the leading-strand progression is blocked at the site of the imprint. Because recombination frequently occurs at stalled replication forks (Michel et al. 2001), the data support the model that the switching event is initiated when leading-strand replication encounters the imprint in the template strand.
|
According to the direction-of-replication model (Fig. 1B), approximately half of the cells in the population should have an imprint at mat1. Wild-type mat1 is replicated in the centromere-proximal direction. Therefore, on a 2D gel of mat1 replication intermediates, the ascending part of the Y-arc (Fig. 3B, left panel, region 1) will contain the forks approaching the imprint from the distal side, and the descending part of the Y-arc (Fig. 3B, left panel, region 2) will represent the forks leaving the site of the imprint on the proximal side (Fig. 3A,B). In the wild-type cells that contain the imprint, replication forks are converted into recombination intermediates at the site of the imprint, and these intermediates run at a different position on 2D gels (data not shown). We quantified the signal of the ascending and descending parts of the Y-arc (Fig. 3B, left panel) of the wild-type strain and the nonswitching smt-0 strain, and, as predicted, observed an approximately twofold decrease in signal of the descending part of the arc in the wild type compared with the smt-0 mutant (Fig. 3B, right panel, signal 2). Therefore, in the switching wild-type strain, the abundance of the forks leaving the site of the imprint on the proximal side is lower than in the nonswitching strain. This observation provides an additional support to the model that the recombination and switching are initiated when the leading-strand replication complex encounters the imprint in the template strand.
A `chicken foot' is formed when the leading-strand replication encounters the imprint in the template strand
Our data, published earlier, suggest that replication pausing at mat1 is prerequisite to imprinting (Dalgaard and Klar 2000). However, mat1 pausing and imprinting can be genetically separated: both swi7 and smt-0 mutants display a wild-type level of replication pausing at mat1, but lack the imprint (Dalgaard and Klar 2000). When we compared mat1 replication intermediates of wild-type and smt-0 strains by means of 2D gels, we detected a cone-shaped signal at the apex of the wild-type arc (Fig. 3A, wt). Importantly, this cone signal is absent on a 2D gel of the smt-0 strain (Fig. 3A, smt-0), suggesting that it represents the structure formed when the replication fork encounters the imprint in the template strand. These structures display a mobility characteristic of regressing replication forks similar to those formed when the leading-strand replication encounters DNA damage (Sogo et al. 2002; Courcelle et al. 2003). Indeed, both the replication fork that is blocked at the site of the imprint and the reversed fork generated from the blocked fork (Fig. 4B, right diagram) have the same molecular weight. Therefore, both fork structures should not separate in the first-dimension gel, but only in the second, where the regressed forks are retarded due to a more branched structure. Thus, on a 2D gel, the cone signal representing the regressing forks from the site of the imprint can only be positioned above the region of the Y-arc that corresponds to the forks blocked at the imprint.
|
Fork reversal is well characterized in bacterial systems. There, the helicase RecG can actively drive fork reversal, while another helicase, RecQ, is thought to counteract it, converting the X-shaped intermediate back into the Y-shaped replication fork. However, fork reversal can also happen spontaneously, without involvement of enzymes (for review, see Michel et al. 2001). Although the S. pombe homolog of RecG has not yet been identified, S. pombe rqh1p is thought to possess activities similar to RecQ (Fig. 4B; Murray et al. 1997; Doe et al. 2000, 2002). To confirm that the cone signal observed on 2D gels of mat1 represents fork regression, we analyzed the rqh1 mutant strain. Because rqh1 is involved in resetting reversed replication forks, we expected to see an increase in intensity of the cone signal, due to accumulation of the reversed forks. Indeed, the cone signal is more prominent on the 2D gel of the rqh1 mutant than on the gel of the wild-type strain (Fig. 4A). This result supports the suggestion that the observed signal represents fork regression.
The analyzed strains contain the S. cerevisiae LEU2 marker inserted distal to mat1. This insertion does not affect pausing or imprinting (data not shown), but because of the different length of the analyzed fragment, the pause site and the site of the imprint are displaced along the Y-arc compared with that shown in Figure 3A. Importantly, the cone signal is also displaced, indicating that the "chicken foot" is linked to the position of the imprint in the DNA.
Imprint is one or two ribonucleotides
Because the imprint is an alkali-labile modification present in the strand that was replicated as lagging, it was suggested earlier that it might be an RNA primer remaining after Okazaki-fragment processing (Dalgaard and Klar 1999). To directly test whether the imprint is an RNA, we used RNase treatment of the imprinted DNA, followed by a primer extension assay. It was shown earlier that some DNA preparation methods convert the imprint into a DSB, whereas others may maintain it intact (Arcangioli 1998; Dalgaard and Klar 1999). When DNA is purified as for 2D gels (Huberman et al. 1987), the imprint is converted into a DSB at only a low level. Surprisingly, when the primer extension was performed on double-stranded, nonreplicating DNA purified by this method, none or very little signal at the site of the imprint was detected (Fig. 5A, lane 1). This observation suggests that the VentR(exo–) polymerase used in the assay for primer extension is able to read through the imprint. We repeated the experiment, first converting the imprint into a break by using sodium hydroxide treatment before the primer extension (Fig. 5A, line drawing). As expected, the treatment generated a signal at the site where the imprint has been mapped previously and an additional weaker band could be detected one nucleotide below (Fig. 5A, lane 3; Nielsen and Egel 1989). These data show that the VentR(exo–) polymerase is able to read through the imprint under the conditions used in this assay, possibly due to its lack of proofreading activity. To test whether the imprint is an RNA, we treated imprinted DNA with the unspecific single-stranded RNase T2. Indeed, the treatment generated a break, showing that the imprint might be one, or several, RNA residue(s) (Fig. 5A, lane 2). To verify that RNase T2 is able to cleave single-stranded DNA that contains only one ribonucleotide, we used an oligo with one ribonucleotide in a sequence context that corresponded to that of the mat1 imprint. The treatment of the 5' end-labeled oligo verified that RNase T2 can cleave such a substrate (Fig. 5B). To estimate how many RNA residues comprise the imprint, we used our observation that the VentR(exo–) DNA polymerase can read through the intact imprint. We used synthetic templates with one, two, three, or eight ribonucleotide residues in a sequence context that corresponded to that of the mat1 imprint (Fig. 5D). Primer extension using one cycle showed that the VentR(exo–) polymerase is partly able to read through one and two residues, and that this read-through is almost complete if, as in the primer extension assay, 30 cycles of extension are performed (Fig. 5C, left panel). However, if the number of ribonucleotides is increased to three or eight residues, they act as a complete block for the polymerase (Fig. 5C, right panel). These data suggest that the imprint is one or two ribonucleotides incorporated into the DNA duplex.
|
No RNA primers, synthesized during lagging-strand replication, map to the site of the imprint
Because swi7/polymerase forms a complex with primase, which synthesizes RNA primers during replication, it was proposed that the imprint at mat1 is a part of such an RNA primer, left after Okazaki-fragment processing (Dalgaard and Klar 1999). To test this hypothesis, we mapped the position of RNA primers, formed during lagging-strand synthesis at mat1, by using the method for replication initiation point (RIP) mapping (Gerbi and Bielinsky 1997). The replication intermediates were purified as for 2D gels, phosphorylated using T4 polynucleotide kinase, and subsequently digested with 
-exonuclease. This enzyme recognizes 5'-phosphorylated DNA ends; thus the exonuclease digest leaves only nascent DNA molecules, protected by RNA primers on the 5'-end (Fig. 6A, right line drawing, solid black lines). The nascent DNA is then used as a template for primer extension. Extensive analysis with different primers revealed problems with unspecific annealing. To circumvent this problem, we analyzed wild-type mat1 and smt-0 DNA in parallel. The smt-0 deletion is located distal to mat1 (Fig. 3A, line drawing). By using a primer within the region, covered by the smt-0 deletion, we could identify bands formed due to specific annealing, as they should appear only in the lane with wild-type DNA. Primer priSV3 was selected as giving the highest specificity. Surprisingly, no specific band can be detected at the position of the imprint (Fig. 6A, left panel). This result suggests that the imprint is not formed from an RNA primer left after Okazaki-fragment processing and raises the possibilities that either the imprint is made during elongation of an Okazaki fragment, or the modification is introduced after the replication of the region is completed.
|
Interestingly, the cone signal observed in Figures 3A and 4A, which represents reversal of the replication fork at the site of the imprint, is not protruding from the center of the pause signal, as would be expected if pausing occurred at the site of imprinting. Instead, it originates from a position that is displaced along the Y-arc (Fig. 3A, right diagram). This physical separation of the two signals suggests, surprisingly, that the replication fork pausing occurs at the position different from the imprinting site. Because mat1 is replicated in a unidirectional manner, the position of the cone signal on the apex and the pause signal on the descending part of the Y-arc shows that the pause occurs within the mat1 cassette at the centromere-proximal side of the imprint.
In the primer extension experiments described earlier, the most prominent band observed on a gel mapped 
350 nucleotides upstream of the imprint, also on a centromere-proximal side (Fig. 6A, left panel). To test whether this band represents the mat1 pause site, we compared wild-type, swi1, swi3, and swi7 strains on the gel: in original 2D-gel analysis, the pause site was shown to be present in wild type and swi7 and absent in swi1 and swi3 mutants (Dalgaard and Klar 2000). Surprisingly, the RIP-mapping analysis detected this prominent band with equal intensity in all four strains (Fig. 6A, right panel). We therefore repeated the experiment with paused intermediates purified from the agarose gels, omitting the -exonuclease treatment, and here we observed a significant difference between wild-type and swi3 strains. The signal that appears as two bands at positions 342 and 345 is much stronger in the wild type than in swi3 and absent in smt-0 (Figs. 6B, 7A). We speculated that when the replication fork pauses, Okazaki-fragment processing takes place, and RNase H removes the RNA primers from the long-lived paused molecules detected by 2D gels. -Exonuclease, used in the first experiment, removes the processed paused intermediates, which are not protected by an RNA primer, in the wild-type DNA. Thus, there is no difference in frequency the lagging-strand priming site is used in the strains that lack pausing, but swi1p- and swi3p-dependent pausing allows accumulation of Okazaki fragments where the RNA primers have been processed by RNase H.
|
To map the end of the leading strand in the paused replication fork, we used the high-resolution Southern blot method described earlier. A similar approach was used previously to map the blocked replication fork in the rDNA repeats of S. cerevisiae (Gruber et al. 2000), where 150 copies of rDNA repeats per genome are present. However, for a single-copy mat1 locus, it proved to be very difficult. The balance between analyzing enough DNA to detect the signal and using a thin enough gel to maintain resolution allows mapping of the paused leading strand within a 10- to 20-nucleotide region. The DNA was digested to generate a 265-nucleotide full-length fragment of the bottom strand (Fig. 6C, line drawing). The probe, specific to the leading (bottom) strand, detected two signals in a range of 354–361 and 362–369 nucleotides upstream of the site of the imprint, which are absent in the swi1 mutant (Figs. 6C, 7A; Supplementary Fig. 1). This signal is close to the 5'-end, mapped by primer extension on the lagging-strand paused intermediates.
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractResultsDiscussionMaterials and methodsAcknowledgmentsReferences |
|---|
). At mat1, this signal can be seen in the strains of different genotypes, where imprinting is not affected (Dalgaard and Klar 2000). We map the end of the nascent leading strand, formed when the replication fork encounters the imprint, to the position of the imprint. Together, these data support our earlier proposal that switching is initiated when the leading-strand replication complex encounters the imprint in the template strand and is unable to read through. Thus, the biological function of the imprint is to create an appropriate 3'-end of the invading strand, necessary for the subsequent recombination between mat1 and one of the donor loci, mat2P or mat3M. This can occur either through a replication fork collapse, where fork regression has to occur before the formation of a break in the imprinted template strand, or directly by using the protruding 3'-end of the newly synthesized leading strand, exposed in the "chicken foot".
Second, we demonstrate that the site of the mat1 imprint/"chicken foot" structure and the site of replication pause, prerequisite to imprinting and mating-type switching, are separated on a 2D gel (Figs. 3A, 4). We also map the 3'-end of the nascent leading strand in the paused replication complex 354–369 nucleotides upstream of the site of the imprint, using high-resolution Southern blot, and the 5'-end of the nascent lagging strand 342–345 nucleotides upstream of the site of the imprint, using primer extension (Fig. 7A). This means that the leading-strand replication complex has already passed the region where the imprint is to be introduced (Fig. 7B, Step 1). Primer extension on Okazaki fragments shows that wild type, swi1, swi3, and swi7 display a similar amount of fragments, the DNA part of which starts 342–345 nucleotides from the imprint. However, when primer extension is performed on purified paused intermediates in the wild type, the signal is greatly increased. These data suggest that pausing of lagging-strand replication occurs after polymerase has initiated the synthesis of the last Okazaki fragment, and that RNase H is able to remove the RNA primers at the stalled fork (Fig. 7B, Step 2).
We do not know what the signal for the imprinting event is. Because the 5'-end of the lagging-strand template becomes exposed earlier than the 3'-end, it would remain single-stranded for a longer period of time. There is evidence from experiments with trinucleotide repeat tracts in S. cerevisiae that this allows formation of the secondary structure in the DNA, thus affecting lagging-but not leading-strand synthesis (Maurer et al. 1998). At the mat1 locus of S. pombe, the sequence around the imprint has symmetric properties (Nielsen and Egel 1989) and the homology domain H1 (Fig. 1A) is important for replication pausing as well as for the formation of the imprint (Styrkarsdottir et al. 1993; Kaykov et al. 2004). Alternatively, a trans-acting protein might bind the exposed single-stranded DNA at the implicated H1 sequence. Therefore, the lagging-strand replication might encounter difficulties during elongation through this region, either due to the secondary DNA structure, or due to involvement of a trans-acting factor. Such barriers can constitute the signal that leads to imprinting (Fig. 7B, Step 2).
Last, we show that the mat1 imprint is sensitive to RNases, and we estimate that it consists of one or two ribonucleotides. The assay used here could not detect an RNA primer at the position of the mat1 imprint, which suggests that the imprint is not a part of a primer that is normally synthesized to initiate a new Okazaki fragment. We see at least three possible mechanisms for imprint introduction (Fig. 7B, Step 3). (1) It could be that mistakes happen during lagging-strand synthesis, when the lagging-strand replication complex attempts to escape from the stall site. In S. cerevisiae trinucleotide repeat tracts, this leads to tract expansion (Pelletier et al. 2003). Ribonucleotide(s) at mat1 can be introduced when the lagging-strand replication is overcoming the barrier present in the template DNA. (2) The studies using the SV40 DNA replication system showed that synthesis of the first 30 nucleotides of an Okazaki fragment by polymerase is followed by polymerase switch, and the rest of the fragment is completed by polymerase 
(Waga and Stillman 1998). Because of the signal during lagging-strand progression through the site of the imprint, a reverse change of polymerases may take place, and the ribonucleotides are incorporated in a swi7/pol-dependent manner. (3) Alternatively, such ribonucleotides could be formed postreplicatively by an oxidation of the DNA backbone (Fig. 7C). The difference between ribose and deoxyribose is one oxygen atom at the 2' position. The enzyme ribonucleotide-reductase converts ribonucleotides into deoxyribonucleotides using NADPH as a source of energy. We imagine that the reverse process can be catalyzed by an oxidating enzyme that has a structure to bind the DNA duplex and access the 2' position of the deoxyribose, and the signal from the lagging-strand synthesis might designate the site for the modification.
The presence of ribonucleotides in the newly replicated DNA was previously shown by RNase sensitivity assays in mitochondrial DNA, where ribonucleotides are present in both nascent strands, but are much more abundant in the newly synthesized lagging strand (Yang et al. 2002). The data presented here is the first evidence of a site-specific RNase-sensitive modification in the nuclear eukaryotic DNA. Such imprints could act as a mark for other cellular processes. Indeed, the imprinting function of swi1, swi3, and swi7 is important for alkylation damage repair in S. pombe (E. Sommariva, T. Pellny, S. Vengrova, T. Eydmann and J. Dalgaard, in prep.). There, such imprints are proposed to mark the sites where the replication forks were stalled by damage to the template DNA. swi1p, swi3p, and swi7p proteins, involved in imprinting in S. pombe, are conserved from yeast to metazoans, suggesting that similar mechanisms may play a role in other organisms.
|
Materials and methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractResultsDiscussionMaterials and methodsAcknowledgmentsReferences |
|---|
Strains were constructed as described elsewhere (Moreno et al. 1991). The genotypes of the strains used are as follows: JZ105, h90 mat1M 
mat 2,3::LEU2, ade6-210, leu1-32, ura4-D18, his2; JZ108, mat1M smt-0 mat 2,3::LEU2, ade6-210, leu1-32, his2; JZ217, h90 mat1 1.5 Kb distal::LEU2, ade6-210, leu1-32, ura4-D18, swi6 mod+; JZ477, h90 mat1 1.5 Kb distal::LEU2, ade6-210, leu1-32, ura4-D18, swi6 mod+, rqh1::ura4; SV1, h90 mat1M mat 2,3::LEU2, ade6-216, his2, swi3; SV5, h90 mat1M mat 2,3::LEU2, ade6-210, leu1-32, ura4-D18, his2, swi1::ura4; SP469, h90 mat1M mat 2,3::LEU2, ade6-216, leu1-32, his2, swi7 (A. Klar, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD); SP835, h90 mat1P mat2,3::LEU2 ade6-216 leu1-32 ura4-D18 his2 (A. Klar); SP976, h90 ade6-210, leu1-32, ura4-D18, swi6 mod+ (A. Klar).
DNA preparation
Yeast chromosomal DNA was purified form logarithmically growing culture as described by Huberman et al. (1987). Replication intermediates were separated from nonreplicating DNA by BND-cellulose chromatography (Kiger and Sinsheimer 1969). 2D gels were performed as described by Brewer and Fangman (1987), except that the first- and second-dimension gels contained 0.5% and 1.2% agarose, respectively.
High-resolution Southern blot
Replication intermediates were digested with SspI or BstNI/SfaNI and enriched using BND-cellulose. The DNA was precipitated overnight with isopropanol, redissolved in loading buffer, and loaded on a 6% denaturing polyacrylamide gel. Sequencing reactions, made using primers mat1M-SspI (GCACTCCCTAC CATAATATACTCACTAAT) or mat1M-SfaNI (CTAAAACAG TATGGCATTAC) and a bacterial plasmid containing the EcoRI fragment of mat1M (pBZ85), were run in parallel as a marker. The DNA was electroblotted on a GeneScreen membrane (NEN). For Figure 2A, the membrane was probed with a strand-specific RNA probe (Nielsen and Egel 1989). For Figure 6C, the probe was synthesized by linear primer extension, using primer mat1M-BstNI (TGGTTATAAGTACCAGCCTAG), on a 268-bp BstNI/SfaNI fragment (Ruven et al. 1994).
Primer extension
NaOH treatment of nonreplicating DNA was performed as follows: DNA was incubated in 40 mM NaOH, 2 mM EDTA at 25°C for 2 h, neutralized with equimolar HCl, and precipitated before primer extension. RNase treatment of nonreplicating DNA was performed by incubating heat-denatured DNA with 10 units of RNase T2 or 1000 units of RNase T1 (both from Life Technologies) for 30 min to 2 h at 37°C, followed by phenol/chloroform extraction and precipitation before primer extension. For RNase H (Life Technologies) digest, 4 units of the enzyme were used and the DNA was not denatured. Nascent DNA was purified using -exonuclease as for RIP mapping (Gerbi and Bielinsky 1997). For Figure 6B, the replication intermediates were digested with NdeI and separated as for 2D gels on a first-dimension gel. The region from 3.5 to 6 kb was excised, and the DNA was purified using a Qiagen gel-purification kit. Primer extension was performed using primers priSV1 (ATC TCGTTAGAGGGAAGGGGAAGGT) and priSV3 (AATATT AGTGAGTATATTATGGT) and VentR(exo–) DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs). Sequencing reactions using corresponding primers and a bacterial pBZ85 plasmid were run in parallel as a marker. Synthetic templates were obtained from Helena Biosciences. Primer priSV2 and template 1 were end-labeled with 
32P-ATP (Amersham Pharmacia) and T4 polynucleotide kinase (New England Biolabs). Extension reactions were performed as for RIP mapping.
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
|
TopAbstractResultsDiscussionMaterials and methodsAcknowledgmentsReferences |
|---|
The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 USC section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
|
Footnotes |
|---|
Article published ahead of print. Article and publication date are at http://www.genesdev.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gad.289404.
1 E-MAIL j.dalgaard{at}mcri.ac.uk; FAX 44-0-1883-714375. 
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractResultsDiscussionMaterials and methodsAcknowledgmentsReferences |
|---|
Arcangioli, B. and de Lahondes, R. 2000. Fission yeast switches mating type by a replication-recombination coupled process. EMBO J. 19: 1389-1396.[CrossRef][Medline]
Arcangioli, B. and Klar, A.J. 1991. A novel switch-activating site (SAS1) and its cognate binding factor (SAP1) required for efficient mat1 switching in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. EMBO J. 10: 3025-3032.[Medline]
Beach, D.H. 1983. Cell type switching by DNA transposition in fission yeast. Nature 305: 682-687.[CrossRef]
Beach, D.H. and Klar, A.J. 1984. Rearrangements of the transposable mating-type cassettes of fission yeast. EMBO J. 3: 603-610.[Medline]
Brewer, B.J. and Fangman, W.L. 1987. The localization of replication origins on ARS plasmids in S. cerevisiae. Cell 51: 463-471.[CrossRef][Medline]
Courcelle, J., Donaldson, J.R., Chow, K.H., and Courcelle, C.T. 2003. DNA damage-induced replication fork regression and processing in Escherichia coli. Science 299: 1064-1067.
Dalgaard, J.Z. and Klar, A.J. 1999. Orientation of DNA replication establishes mating-type switching pattern in S. pombe. Nature 400: 181-184.[CrossRef][Medline]
____. 2000. swi1 and swi3 perform imprinting, pausing, and termination of DNA replication in S. pombe. Cell 102: 745-751.[CrossRef][Medline]
____. 2001a. A DNA replication-arrest site RTS1 regulates imprinting by determining the direction of replication at mat1 in S. pombe. Genes & Dev. 15: 2060-2068.
____. 2001b. Does S. pombe exploit the intrinsic asymmetry of DNA synthesis to imprint daughter cells for mating-type switching? Trends Genet. 17: 153-157.[CrossRef][Medline]
Di Noia, J. and Neuberger, M.S. 2002. Altering the pathway of immunoglobulin hypermutation by inhibiting uracil-DNA glycosylase. Nature 419: 43-48.[CrossRef][Medline]
Doe, C.L., Dixon, J., Osman, F., and Whitby, M.C. 2000. Partial suppression of the fission yeast rqh1(-) phenotype by expression of a bacterial Holliday junction resolvase. EMBO J. 19: 2751-2762.[CrossRef][Medline]
Doe, C.L., Ahn, J.S., Dixon, J., and Whitby, M.C. 2002. Mus81-Eme1 and Rqh1 involvement in processing stalled and collapsed replication forks. J. Biol. Chem. 277: 32753-32759.
Egel, R. and Eie, B. 1987. Cell lineage asymmetry for Schizosaccharomyces pombe: Unilateral transmission of a high-frequency state of mating-type switching in diploid pedigrees. Curr. Genet. 12: 429-433.[CrossRef]
Egel, R., Beach, D.H., and Klar, A.J. 1984. Genes required for initiation and resolution steps of mating-type switching in fission yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 81: 3481-3485.
Foss, E.J. 2001. Tof1p regulates DNA damage responses during S phase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 157: 567-577.
Gellert, M. 2002. V(D)J recombination: RAG proteins, repair factors, and regulation. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 71: 101-132.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gerbi, S.A. and Bielinsky, A.K. 1997. Replication initiation point mapping. Methods 13: 271-280.[CrossRef][Medline]
Gruber, M., Wellinger, R.E., and Sogo, J.M. 2000. Architecture of the replication fork stalled at the 3' end of yeast ribosomal genes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20: 5777-5787.
Haber, J.E. 1998. Mating-type gene switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Annu. Rev. Genet. 32: 561-599.[CrossRef][Medline]
Huberman, J.A., Spotila, L.D., Nawotka, K.A., el-Assouli, S.M., and Davis, L.R. 1987. The in vivo replication origin of the yeast 2 microns plasmid. Cell 51: 473-481.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kaykov, A., Holmes, A.M., and Arcangioli, B. 2004. Formation, maintenance and consequences of the imprint at the mating-type locus in fission yeast. EMBO J 23: 930-938.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kelly, M., Burke, J., Smith, M., Klar, A., and Beach, D. 1988. Four mating-type genes control sexual differentiation in the fission yeast. EMBO J. 7: 1537-1547.[Medline]
Kiger Jr., J.A. and Sinsheimer, R.L. 1969. Vegetative lambda DNA. IV. Fractionation of replicating lambda DNA on benzoylated-naphthoylated DEAE cellulose. J. Mol. Biol. 40: 467-490.[CrossRef][Medline]
Klar, A.J. 1987. Differentiated parental DNA strands confer developmental asymmetry on daughter cells in fission yeast. Nature 326: 466-470.[CrossRef][Medline]
Klar, A.J. and Bonaduce, M.J. 1993. The mechanism of fission yeast mating-type interconversion: Evidence for two types of epigenetically inherited chromosomal imprinted events. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 58: 457-465.[Medline]
Klar, A.J. and Miglio, L.M. 1986. Initiation of meiotic recombination by double-strand DNA breaks in S. pombe. Cell 46: 725-731.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kostriken, R., Strathern, J.N., Klar, A.J., Hicks, J.B., and Heffron, F. 1983. A site-specific endonuclease essential for mating-type switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell 35: 167-174.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lakin-Thomas, P.L. 2000. Circadian rhythms: New functions for old clock genes. Trends Genet. 16: 135-142.[CrossRef][Medline]
Maurer, D.J., O'Callaghan, B.L., and Livingston, D.M. 1998. Mapping the polarity of changes that occur in interrupted CAG repeat tracts in yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18: 4597-4604.
McBlane, J.F., van Gent, D.C., Ramsden, D.A., Romeo, C., Cuomo, C.A., Gellert, M., and Oettinger, M.A. 1995. Cleavage at a V(D)J recombination signal requires only RAG1 and RAG2 proteins and occurs in two steps. Cell 83: 387-395.[CrossRef][Medline]
Michel, B., Flores, M.J., Viguera, E., Grompone, G., Seigneur, M., and Bidnenko, V. 2001. Rescue of arrested replication forks by homologous recombination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 98: 8181-8188.
Miyata, H. and Miyata, M. 1981. Mode of conjugation in homothallic cells of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 27: 365-371.
Moreno, S., Klar, A., and Nurse, P. 1991. Molecular genetic analysis of fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Methods Enzymol. 194: 795-823.[Medline]
Murray, J.M., Lindsay, H.D., Munday, C.A., and Carr, A.M. 1997. Role of Schizosaccharomyces pombe RecQ homolog, recombination, and checkpoint genes in UV damage tolerance. Mol. Cell. Biol. 17: 6868-6875.[Abstract]
Nielsen, O. and Egel, R. 1989. Mapping the double-strand breaks at the mating-type locus in fission yeast by genomic sequencing. EMBO J. 8: 269-276.[Medline]
Noguchi, E., Noguchi, C., Du, L.L., and Russell, P. 2003. Swi1 prevents replication fork collapse and controls checkpoint kinase Cds1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23: 7861-7874.
Park, H. and Sternglanz, R. 1999. Identification and characterization of the genes for two topoisomerase I-interacting proteins from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 15: 35-41.[CrossRef][Medline]
Pelletier, R., Krasilnikova, M.M., Samadashwily, G.M., Lahue, R., and Mirkin, S.M. 2003. Replication and expansion of trinucleotide repeats in yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23: 1349-1357.
Rada, C., Williams, G.T., Nilsen, H., Barnes, D.E., Lindahl, T., and Neuberger, M.S. 2002. Immunoglobulin isotype switching is inhibited and somatic hypermutation perturbed in UNG-deficient mice. Curr. Biol. 12: 1748-1755.[CrossRef][Medline]
Ruven, H.J., Seelen, C.M., Lohman, P.H., Mullenders, L.H., and van Zeeland, A.A. 1994. Efficient synthesis of 32P-labeled single-stranded DNA probes using linear PCR; application of the method for analysis of strand-specific DNA repair. Mutat. Res. 315: 189-195.[CrossRef][Medline]
Singh, J. and Klar, A.J. 1993. DNA polymerase-alpha is essential for mating-type switching in fission yeast. Nature 361: 271-273.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sogo, J.M., Lopes, M., and Foiani, M. 2002. Fork reversal and ssDNA accumulation at stalled replication forks owing to checkpoint defects. Science 297: 599-602.
Styrkarsdottir, U., Egel, R., and Nielsen, O. 1993. The smt-0 mutation which abolishes mating-type switching in fission yeast is a deletion. Curr. Genet. 23: 184-186.[CrossRef][Medline]
Waga, S. and Stillman, B. 1998. The DNA replication fork in eukaryotic cells. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67: 721-751.[CrossRef][Medline]
Yang, M.Y., Bowmaker, M., Reyes, A., Vergani, L., Angeli, P., Gringeri, E., Jacobs, H.T., and Holt, I.J. 2002. Biased incorporation of ribonucleotides on the mitochondrial L-strand accounts for apparent strand-asymmetric DNA replication. Cell 111: 495-505.[CrossRef][Medline]
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us 
Digg 
Reddit 
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  D. T. Long and K. N. Kreuzer Regression supports two mechanisms of fork processing in phage T4 PNAS, May 13, 2008; 105(19): 6852 - 6857. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Yamada-Inagawa, A. J. S. Klar, and J. Z. Dalgaard Schizosaccharomyces pombe Switches Mating Type by the Synthesis-Dependent Strand-Annealing Mechanism Genetics, September 1, 2007; 177(1): 255 - 265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
