|
|
|
PERSPECTIVE
1 Department of Biochemistry, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63104, USA; 2 Saint Louis University Cancer Center, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63104, USA
Genetic and epigenetic information is passed to the next generation through germ cells. In this issue of Genes and Development, Krishnamoorthy et al. (2006)
have elegantly demonstrated that a conserved histone modification, phosphorylation of Ser1 on histone 4 (H4 S1ph) is involved in chromatin compaction during sporulation in yeast, and that it is an evolutionarily conserved mark found during Drosophila melanogaster and mouse germ cell development.
Post-translational modifications of core histones (PTMs) and incorporation of histone variants/replacement proteins during gametogenesis provide an exceptional example of the relationship between chromatin structure and function. In these instances, histones fulfill their more traditional role as structural regulators and DNA packaging proteins, while providing modification- or variant-specific regulation. Significant changes in chromatin architecture are mediated in part by evolutionarily conserved modifications of histone within the nucleosomes, including ubiquitination, methylation, acetylation, and phosphorylation (Workman and Kingston 1998
; Shilatifard 2006
). These histone modifications serve to alter chromatin structure and thus regulate transcription factor accessibility to chromatin and affect transcriptional readout.
During metazoan gametogenesis, cells incorporate somatic and gamete-specific histone variants, as well as generalized histone modifications into their chromatin prior to replacement by DNA packaging proteins (Lewis et al. 2003
). Spermatogenesis in Drosophila requires the differentiation of round spermatids into an elongated, needle-like structure, with a 200-fold drop in nuclear volume. This is accomplished in part by modification of histones, as well as a highly orchestrated succession of histone replacements by sperm-specific histone variants, then by basic transition proteins, and finally protamines (Sassone-Corsi 2002
; Govin et al. 2004
; Kimmins and Sassone-Corsi 2005
). The appearance of these new his- tone subtypes and specific histone modification patterns and their correlation with genome compaction, sperm function, and increased fertility, comprise a germ cell- specific histone modification pattern that alters chromatin structure during meiosis.
Saccharomyces cerevisae must protect its genome from damage while simultaneously replicating, recombining, and properly segregating haploid genomes to individual spores. In response to nutrient deprivation, diploid S. cerevisae cells undergo meiosis to produce four stable, metabolically inert haploid spores. Of
6000 protein-encoding genes in yeast, >1000 show significant changes in expression during the four stages of sporulationearly, middle, mid-late, and late (Chu et al. 1998
). These stages result from a sequential cascade of transcription factors and a specialized mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase signaling pathway. During meiosis there is strong correlation between a gene's expression pattern and its involvement in a particular biological process. Early genes are typically involved in pairing of homologous chromosomes and recombination, middle genes are required for nuclear division and spore formation, and mid-late genes include those necessary for the outer layer of the spore wall (Chu et al. 1998
).
The metaphase peak of post-translational phosphorylation of S10 of histone H3 from late G2 to telophase is a hallmark of mitosis and meiosis in yeast and metazoan species, and this particular modification correlates with chromatin condensation (Hsu et al. 2000
; Nowak and Corces 2004
). However, mutations altering S10 of H3 do not alter mitosis, meiosis, or cell growth, suggesting a possible redundancy of its function (Hsu et al. 2000
; Barber et al. 2004
).
In this issue of Genes and Development, Krishnamoorthy et al. (2006)
re-examined the function of the previously described phosphorylation of S1 of histone H4 in chromatin compaction during sporulation. They found H4Ser1ph to be required for proper chromatin compaction during sporulation, and also for gametogenesis. It is significant that this histone modification is evolutionarily conserved, from Drosophila to mammals.
| H4 S1 is phosphorylated during sporulation, and unlike H3 S10ph, appears to be a stable modification |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although H3 S10 is a common mitotic/meiotic his- tone phosphorylation mark correlated with chromatin condensation, mutations that alter H3 S10 do not effect either mitosis or meiosis (Barber et al. 2004
). Therefore, Krishnamoorthy et al. (2006)
sought to determine whether an H4 S1A mutation demonstrates defects in sporulation. Diploid cells possessing a substitution of alanine for Ser1 have defects in sporulation. However, other mutations affecting other residues of H4 do not affect sporulation, indicating that the defect of the S1A mutant is not due to a nonspecific modification of H4. In light of these observations, it would be interesting to determine whether the expression of H4 bearing Asp in place of Ser1 in diploid cells could initiate chromatin compaction associated with sporulation in rich media.
| H4 S1 is phosphorylated in an Sps1-dependent manner during sporulation |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although deletion of SPS1 results in the loss of H4 S1ph during sporulation, Krishnamoorthy et al. (2006)
have been unable to demonstrate phosphorylation of H4 by Sps1 (expressed in bacterial cells and purified) in vitro. Therefore, Sps1 may not be the protein kinase that directly catalyzes phosphorylation of H4 S1. On the other hand, it is possible that Sps1 needs to be activated via an unknown post-translational modification(s) or accessory protein during middle sporulation to be able to catalyze phosphorylation of H4 S1. Such regulation is a common phenomenon in chromatin biology. Other chromatin- modifying enzymes such as Rad6/Bre1 require auxiliary factors (Paf1 complex, Bur1/Bur2, etc.) for their function (Krogan et al. 2003
; Wood et al. 2003a
, b
, 2005
; Schneider et al. 2005
). Furthermore, it is plausible that other post- translational modifications of chromatin are a prerequisite for phosphorylation of H4 S1 by Sps1. Such regulatory cross-talk is also well established in the chromatin field (Dover et al. 2002
; Sun and Allis 2002
; Wood et al. 2003a
, b
; Shilatifard 2006
). Determination of essential factors required for phosphorylation of H4 S1 in response to sporulation will shed further light on the molecular mechanism of this process and define whether Sps1 can directly phosphorylate H4 S1.
| Phosphorylation of H4 S1 can regulate nuclear volume, chromatin compaction, and accessibility |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| H4 S1ph is a conserved histone modification of metazoans |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Possible mechanisms for the role of H4 S1ph in chromatin compaction during sporulation and spermatogenesis |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Additional support for a direct role for acetylation of H4 K16 in chromatin decondensation is the observation that H4 K16Ac is highly acetylated in budding yeast, whose genome exists largely in a decondensed state (Lohr et al. 1977
; Smith et al. 2003
). Since H4 K16Ac is involved in the regulation of chromatin condensation, could other histone modifications regulate chromatin folding as well? This does not appear to be the case for several well-characterized histone modifications, such as H3 S10ph (Fry et al. 2004
), triacetylation of the H3 tail by Gcn5p, and residues 113 of histone H4 (Shogren- Knaak et al. 2006
). These observations suggest that a simple charge modification on a histone tail is not sufficient to regulate chromatin condensation.
The demonstration that phosphorylation of H4 S1 catalyzed by Sps1 can regulate chromatin compaction during sporulation significantly extends our knowledge of the multifaceted roles of histone modifications. Several mechanisms for H4 S1ph in chromatin compaction can be proposed. First, similar to H4 K16Ac, H4 S1ph may be directly involved in the regulation of chromatin compaction (Fig. 1A). In fact, crystallographic studies with yeast mononucleosomes reveal interaction between the H4 tail and DNA of a neighboring particle, suggesting a possible direct role for the H4 tail in the regulation of chromatin compaction (Suto et al. 2000
; Zheng and Hayes 2003
). Furthermore, it was also demonstrated that the N-terminal tails of histones could play a direct role in chromatin and folding of chromosomes into higher order structures (Moore and Ausio 1997
; Carruthers and Hansen 2000
). The development of nucleosomal arrays homogeneously phosphorylated at Ser1 of H4 and the study of its impact on the formation of compact 30-nm or higher-order fibers should shed further light on this model.
|
The study of Krishnamoorthy et al. (2006)
is a major breakthrough because it is the first direct correlation between H4 S1ph and chromatin compaction during spermatogenesis. Future studies defining the molecular role of factor(s) required for specific phosphorylation of this residue of histone H4 during sporulation and the elucidation of how this modification leads to chromatin compaction will further our understanding of the diverse molecular roles of histones and their modifications in development and differentiation.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
E-MAIL shilatia{at}slu.edu; FAX (314) 977-5737. ![]()
Article is online at http://www.genesdev.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gad.1477706.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Carmen, A.A., Milne, L., Grunstein, M. 2002. Acetylation of the yeast histone H4 N terminus regulates its binding to heterochromatin protein SIR3. J. Biol. Chem. 47784781.
Carruthers, L.M. and Hansen, J.C. 2000. The core histone N termini function independently of linker histones during chromatin condensation. J. Biol. Chem. 275: 3728537290.
Chu, S., DeRisi, J., Eisen, M., Mulholland, J., Bostein, D., Brown, P.O., Herskowitz, I. 1998. The transcriptional program of sporulation in budding yeast. Science 282: 699705.
Dover, J., Schneider, J., Tawiah-Boating, M.A., Wood, A., Dean, K., Johnston, M., Shilatifard, A. 2002. Methylation of histone H3 by COMPASS requires ubiquitination of histone H2B by Rad6. J. Biol. Chem. 277: 2836828371.
Elgin, S.C. and Grewal, S.I. 2003. Heterochromatin: Silence is golden. Curr. Biol. 13: 895898.
Fry, C.J., Shogren-Knaak, M.A., Peterson, C.L. 2004. His- tone H3 amino-terminal tail phosphorylation and acetylation: Synergistic or independent transcriptional regulatory marks. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 69: 219226.[CrossRef][Medline]
Govin, J., Caron, C., Lestrat, C., Rousseaux, S., Khochbin, S. 2004. The role of histones in chromatin remodeling during mammalian spermatogenesis. Eur. J. Biochem. 271: 34593469.[Medline]
Hsu, J.Y., Sun, Z.W., Li, X., Reuben, M., Tatchell, K., Bishop, D.K., Grushcow, J.M., Brame, C.J., Caldwell, J.A., Hunt, D.F. et al. 2000. Mitotic phosphorylation of histone H3 is governed by Ipl1/aurora kinase and Glc7/PP1 phosphatase in budding yeast and nematodes. Cell 102: 279291.[CrossRef][Medline]
Kimmins, S. and Sassone-Corsi, P. 2005. Chromatin remodeling and epigenetic features of germ cells. Nature 434: 583589.[CrossRef][Medline]
Krishnamoorthy, T., Chen, X., Govin, J., Cheung, W.L., Dorsey, J., Schindler, K., Winter, E., Allis, C.D., Guacci, V., Khochbin, S. et al. 2006. Phosphorylation of histone H4 Ser1 regulates sporulation in yeast and is conserved in fly and mouse spermatogenesis. Genes& Dev (this issue).
Krogan, N.J., Dover, J., Wood, A., Schneider, J., Heidt, J., Boateng, M.A., Dean, K., Ryan, O.W., Golshani, A., Johnston, M. et al. 2003. The Paf1 complex is required for his- tone H3 methylation by COMPASS and Dot1p: Linking transcriptional elongation to histone methylation. Mol. Cell 11: 721729.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lewis, J.D., Abbot, D.W., Ausió, J. 2003. A haploid affair:Core histone transitions during spermatogenesis. Biochem. Cell Biol. 81: 131140.[CrossRef][Medline]
Lohr, D., Kovacic, R.T., Van Holde, K.E. 1977. Quantitative analysis of the digestion of yeast chromatin by staphylococcal nuclease. Biochemistry 16: 463471.[CrossRef][Medline]
Luger, K., Rechsteiner, T.J., Flaus, A.J., Waye, M.M., Richmond, T.J. 1997. Characterization of nucleosome core particles containing histone proteins made in bacteria. J. Mol. Biol. 272: 301311.[CrossRef][Medline]
Moore, S.C. and Ausio, J. 1997. Major role of the histones H3H4 in the folding of the chromatin fiber. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 230: 136139.[CrossRef][Medline]
Nakayama, J., Rice, J.C., Strahl, B.D., Allis, C.D., Grewal, S.I. 2001. Role of histone H3 lysine 9 methylation in epigenetic control of heterochromatin assembly. Science 292: 110113.
Nowak, S.J. and Corces, V.G. 2004. Phosphorylation of histone H3: A balancing act between chromosome condensation and transcriptional activation. Trends Genet. 20: 214220.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sassone-Corsi, P. 2002. Unique chromatin remodeling and transcriptional regulation in spermatogenesis. Science 296: 21762178.
Schneider, J., Wood, A., Lee, J.S., Schuster, R., Dueker, J., Maguire, C., Swanson, S.K., Florens, L., Washburn, M.P., Shilatifard, A. 2005. Molecular regulation of histone H3 trimethylation by COMPASS and the regulation of gene expression. Mol. Cell 19: 849856.[CrossRef][Medline]
Shilatifard, A. 2006. Chromatin modifications by methylation and ubiquitination: Implications in the regulation of gene expression. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 75: 243269.[CrossRef][Medline]
Shogren-Knaak, M., Ishii, H., Sun, J.M., Pazin, M.J., Davie, J.R., Peterson, C.L. 2006. Histone H4-K16 acetylation controls chromatin structure and protein interactions. Science 311: 844847.
Smith, C.M., Gafken, P.R., Zhang, Z., Gottschling, D.E., Smith, J.B., Smith, D.L. 2003. Mass spectrometric quantification of acetylation at specific lysines within the amino-terminal tail of histone H4. Anal. Biochem. 316: 2333.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sun, Z.W. and Allis, C.D. 2002. Ubiquitination of histone H2B regulates H3 methylation and gene silencing in yeast. Nature 418: 104108.[CrossRef][Medline]
Sung, M.T. and Dixon, G.H. 1970. Modification of histones during spermiogenesis in trout: A molecular mechanism for altering histone binding to DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 67: 16161623.
Suto, R.K., Clarkson, M.J., Tremethick, D.J., Luger, K. 2000. Crystal structure of a nucleosome core particle containing the variant histone H2A.Z. Nat. Struct. Biol. 7: 11211124.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wood, A., Schneider, J., Dover, J., Johnston, M., Shilatifard, A. 2003a. The Paf1 complex is essential for histone monoubiquitination by Rad6/Bre1 and histone methylation by COMPASS. J. Biol. Chem. 278: 3473934742.
Wood, A., Krogan, N.J., Dover, J., Schneider, J., Heidt, J., Boateng, M.A., Dean, K., Golshani, A., Zhang, Y., Greenblatt, J.F. et al. 2003b. Bre1, an E3 ubiquitin ligase required for recruitment and substrate selection of Rad6 at a promoter. Mol. Cell 11: 267274.[CrossRef][Medline]
Wood, A., Schneider, J., Dover, J., Johnston, M., Shilatifard, A. 2005. The Bur1/Bur2 complex is required for histone H2B monoubiquitination by Rad6/Bre1 and histone methylation by COMPASS. Mol. Cell 20: 589599.[CrossRef][Medline]
Workman, J.L. and Kingston, R.E. 1998. Alteration of nucleo- some structure as a mechanism of transcriptional regulation. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67: 545579.[CrossRef][Medline]
Zheng, C. and Hayes, J.J. 2003. Intra- and inter-nucleosomal proteinDNA interactions of the core histone tail domains in a model system. J. Biol. Chem. 278: 2421724224.
Related Article
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Genes & Dev. 2006 20: 2580-2592.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||